Pages

TBOR 2010 Athlete of the Year

Thursday, December 23, 2010


Maya Moore

For 21 years, since January of 1990, I've kept a record of the best sports performances for each week, month, and year.  I fudge a little on each week to limit each month to 4 weeks.  I award an athlete of the month, and finally, and athlete of the year.  Just for the past couple of years I've been putting this online, but over the past year I've been posting the old records as well. You can, were you so inclined, now find 1990-2001 here at the blog, as well as the last couple of years in real time. 

I've never chosen a woman as Athlete of the Year.  It's possible that's been error, but as I've worked my way through the old records, I can't say there's been a switch that I'd make.

I don't consciously think of this award as a reaction to that, nor do I think of it as a reaction to what has been an underappreciation of UConn's streak by the sports public.  But both might be in play. 

What's definitely in play is the following - in a year when no performance demanded the award (AP chose Brees, and he was my runner-up, but while his playoff run and Super Bowl were both good, they weren't spectacular, and while he's followed it with a good 2010 season, he isn't in MVP contention) taking the best player from the best team make sense; and UConn, having not lost a basketball game in the calendar year (and beyond) most of them not close, was the best team in 2010.  (or, hadn't lost a game in the calendar year)

Jimmie Johnson didn't win one of my Athletes of the Month, and therefore wasn't eligible, but I'd see a argument for his winning; Kobe Bryant didn't win one of my Athletes of the Month, and in the way that Johnson or Moore would have their candidacy given gravity by the cumulative weight of accomplishment, I can see an argument for his winning.  I don't think anyone else has a particularly good argument. 

So - left with Brees and Moore, I chose Maya Moore.  The Blog of Revelation 2010 Athlete of the Year.

I Pick Every NFL Game in 2010 - Week 16

Another winner last week.  In case you missed them, my Bowl picks are here.

Season record:
Against The Spread: 107-96-7
Straight Up: 135-75

Carolina +14.5 Steelers (Steelers win game) loss/win
Dallas -7 Arizona loss/loss
Jags -7 Redskins loss/loss
Niners +2.5 Rams loss/loss
Lions +3.5 Miami (Dolphins win game) win/loss
Titans +5 KC (Chiefs win game) loss/win
Bears -1 Jets win/win
Bills +8.5 NE (Patriots win game) loss/win
Browns +3.5 Ravens (Ravens win game) loss/win
Texans -2.5 Denver loss/loss
SD -7.5 Cincinnati loss/loss
Indy -3 Oakland win/win
TB -6 Seattle win/win
GB -3 NYG win/win
Vikes +14.5 Eagles (Eagles win game) win/loss
Atlanta -2.5 NO loss/loss

ATS: 6-10, 113-106-7
SU: 8-8, 143-83

TBOR Athlete of the Month - December, 2010 +2001 Athlete of the Year

Tuesday, December 21, 2010


Tom Brady.

Runners-up: Cam Newton, LeBron James, Maya Moore

You can get to the previous 11 months here.

Nov - Tim Lincecum
Oct - Matt Cain
Sept - Troy Tulowitzki
Aug - Josh Hamilton
July - Diego Forlan
June - John Isner
May - Rajon Rondo
April - Phil Mickelson
March - Maya Moore
Feb- Drew Brees
Jan - Peyton Manning


And so that's it.  12 nominees for 2010 Athlete of the Year.  I will award that on Christmas Eve.


Back in 2001, my Athlete of the Year was Barry Bonds.  AP also chose Bonds


January - Ray Lewis (Josh Heupel, Kerry Collins, Jennifer Capriati)
February - Allen Iverson (Chris Webber, Kevin Garnett, Tim Duncan)
March - Shane Battier (Shane Moseley, Jason Williams, Jason Gardner)
April - Tiger Woods (Hideo Nomo, Barry Bonds, Hasim Rachman)
May - Barry Bonds (Shaquille O'Neal, Randy Johnson, Kobe Bryant)
June - Shaquille O'Neal (Jennifer Capriati, Patrick Roy, Karrie Webb)
July - Lance Armstrong (Dale Earnhardt, Jr., Goran Ivanisevic, Cal Ripken)
August - Sammy Sosa (Greg Maddux, Danny Almonte, Roger Clemens)
Spetember - Bernard Hopkins (Venus Williams, Barry Bonds, David Carr)
October - Curt Schilling (Rickey Henderson, Randy Johnson, Mike Brown)
November - Jeff Garcia (Marshall Faulk, Jerry Rice, Ken Dorsey)
December - Tim Duncan (Ahman Green, Brian Urlacher, Jason Williams)

The 200 Greatest Major League Baseball Players Ever 2011 Ed. #150-141

160-151 is here.



150. Jack Glasscock SS WARP+WAR=123.1
Blues/Hoosiers
1879-95
Translated BA/OBP/SLG .293/.350/.451
OPS+ 112
MVPQ (none) 1889 (15)

-The very first shortstop on the list; WAR (I use B-Ref) doesn't give positional value the importance I'd prefer, so shortstops, for example, are a little lower rated than is ideal; but our ability to analyze defense, particularly absent television games, is much less exact than our ability to analyze offense.  


149. Elmer Flick RF 123.1
1898-10
Phillies/Indians
OPS+ 149
.314/.406/.559
MVPQ (none) Best season 1901 (15.6)

-An all time elite bat; I love me a 3/4/5 translated slashmark; Flick joins Shoeless Joe as the only guys on the list so far who post one (Olerud just missed, another reason why he was better than you think.)

148. Gabby Hartnett C 123.3
1922-41
Cubs
 OPS+ 126
.276/.361/.513
MVPQ none, Best season 1935 (12.5)

147. Will Clark 1B 123.4
1986-00
Giants/Rangers
OPS+ 137
.319/.401/.547
MVPQ 1989 19.7

-And the third 3/4/5 slashmark comes from Clark; my favorite ballplayer as a teenager.  Will was the Giants first baseman for 8 seasons; even in a relatively limited time, he's the 5th greatest San Francisco Giant ever, by WAR+WARP.

1986 - 5.1
1987 - 9.5 (untranslated slashline in the NLCS .360/.429/.560
1988 - 15.8
1989 - 19.7 (untranslated slashline in the NLCS .650/.682/.1200) 
1990 - 7.9
1991 - 12.5
1992 - 10.9
1993 - 4

 146. Jim Palmer RHP 123.5
1965-84
Orioles
ERA+ 126
MVPQ none, Best season 1975 (15.2) 

-Maybe a tick overrated in our collective sense of him; it took 20 years to get this total value - he just isn't the equivalent of the Seaver/Carlton class of pitchers from that era.  His fame adds to our thoughts, but Palmer's no higher than this.  

145. Pud Galvin RHP 123.9
1875-92
Bisons/Pirates
ERA+ 108
MVPQ  1884 (25.4)

-Not Glavine; Galvin.  Okay, here's the thing - WAR overrates pre 20th century players, and where it specifically happens is that guys like Galvin break the formula in years like 1884, in which he threw...wait for it...636 innings (which actually was fewer than the year before).  That's just not the same game being played today.  So, subjectively, you'd take Galvin off this list.  

144. Willie Stargell LF/1B 124.1
1962-82
Pirates
OPS+ 147
.293/.376/.599
MVPQ 1973 (16.1)

-Willie Stargell had a big ole' bat.  

143. Home Run Baker 3B 124.9
1908-22
Athletics/Yankees
OPS+ 135
.306/.362/.525
MVPQ  1912 (18.6), 1913 (18.3)

142. Billy Herman 2B 125.6
1931-47
Cubs/Dodgers
OPS+ 112
.306/.375/.450
MVPQ none, Best season 1935 (15.2)

-His name was William Jennings Bryan Herman

141. Hal Newhouser LHP 125.7
1939-55
Tigers
ERA+ 130
MVPQ 1944 (16.8), 1945 (19.9), 1946 (18.7)

-3 consecutive MVPQ seasons get Newhouser here (Bunning would do the same thing 20 years later); as a positive, Newhouser's adjusted ERA is the second best of any pitcher on the list thusfar (and behind just Halladay, who still might lose points on the tail end of his career, and will finish higher on the list obviously than he currently sits); as a negative, he is pitching against a diminished field during the War.  

60 down.  140 to go.  See you in a week.   

The Weekly Tendown - Dec 12-18 2010

Sunday, December 19, 2010

Dear Internet:


The best sports photograph of the year.  It was just a couple weeks ago that the Heat were roundly described as a failed experiment - Bill Simmons picked them to lose decisively in that trip to Cleveland; discussion of "who should they trade" was heating up. 

As a general rule, it's good to temper one's desire to blow up a team based on a small sample size.  We're too fast and loose with other people's jobs. 

With that - here's Tendown 56.

1. Fire Mike Singletary.

I just can't stand him. 

The gigantic wooden cross around his neck, the neanderthal offense, the Chicago Bear lineage, the lack of interest in articulating a philosophy of football outside of "toughness" - there could not be less of a connective thread between the football team that he runs out on the field each week and the legacy built by Bill Walsh; from Dennis Erickson to Mike Nolan to this guy, we've spent the past decade hiring guys who can't get other head coaching jobs anywhere else in the league.  We are absolutely nowhere. 

But if we'd win football games, all of that would be fine.

I think about the transaction between me and my football team like this - they come to me and say "hey, we've got a coaching decision to make - I know you prefer Jim Schwartz, but what do you think about Singletary?"

And after some variation of that previous paragraph, I leave the discussion with "my vote is no - but I'll give it a good faith effort."

He's out of time now.  Playing in an all time bad division, we are 5-9, totally noncompetitive this past Thursday.  There is a fair path to making the playoffs; there is no path to salvaging this season.

I would rather lose those last two games than make the playoffs.  I'll pass up the home playoff gate for the bump up the draft board.  Let someone else be a sub .500 division winner.  I don't want it. 

There are personnel problems with the club.  Alex Smith is equally out of time; he and Samurai Mike can take the same flight out of town.  We don't know yet if Crabtree can play.  We still need an edge pass rusher.  And two cornerbacks. 

And while I don't hate anyone in the front office, there's no one you'd run into the building to save if there were a fire.

It can be whatever level of scorched earth housecleaning is thought needed.  If the new broom is going to err, it should be on the side of  sweeping toward cleanliness.

But what absolutely, unequivocally, needs to happen before Week One of whatever happens to be the next season played in the National Football League, is that Mike Singletary needs to be fired.  He's coached 39 games, it will be 41 by end of the regular season - we're under .500.  That's enough.  41 games is plenty.  Nolan got 55.  Erickson got 32.  41 is enough.  Next. 

2. The Shiva Bowl
Fantasy football playoffs start this week - I'm still alive in all 3 of my leagues (12 team $ leagues, all the money goes to the winner). 

League One - I went Britt over RBrown in my flex, and, as of this second, am taking Oakland over the Falcons as my defense.  Neither is my regular defense, but I grabbed the Falcons a couple weeks ago to get them against Carolina - and I might be wishcasting, but I just can't help but put my money where my mouth is and line up against Tebow's first start.  (rest of my starters - Peyton, McFadden, Mendenhall, Fitzgerald, Nicks, Witten, Akers)

League Two - I've ridden Cassel here, but with the appendectomy picked up Kitna off the street last week and am writing his name one more time; I'm going Maclin over Tampa Mike Williams as my flex.  Gates's injury has meant I've been shuffling TE - this week it's Zach Miller.  And, I picked up the Browns when they faced Carolina and am going with them again against the Bengals. (rest of my starters - Charles, Mendenhall, Bowe, Andre Johnson, Rackers)

League Three - This is the only league where I've already scored points - Tolbert earned me ten Thursday against my Niners (I caught a break in neither hitting Rivers nor Jackson in my matchups); I picked up Boss off the street to replace Gates, and am going with the NYG defense even against Vick and the Eagles (rest of starters - Both Peytons, Mendenhall, Bowe, Jennings, Akers).

My goal's to win 2, then split my title games next week and grab one title.  A modest goal but a reasonable one.

3. I Watch the Movies
Movie week at my house over the past 7 days. 

-Exit Through the Gift Shop (the best film I saw this week, consider pairing it with My Kid Could Paint That)

-The Joan Rivers Documentary (my Lady Type Friend didn't know the story of Johnny never talking to Joan again after she got her own show; I'm 40, she's 32 - so whereas I was in college when Johnny retired, she was still in middle school - Johnny was the freaking Godfather; Joan's not telling him before she signed the deal with Fox was a significant slight in the context of the era.   When NBC wanted to start Saturday Night Live - they went to Johnny for approval; when NBC was going to change their minds and give Dave the Tonight Show instead of Jay, one of the reasons Dave decided to go to CBS was a conversation he had with Johnny - now, that meeting was captured by Bill Carter's first book - but he missed a similar conversation between Conan and Johnny and I think it hurts his new book's thesis.  Carter clearly supports Seinfeld's takeaway from the Jay/Conan situation - that Conan took the idea of "The Tonight Show" too seriously - in 2010, that Conan would rather leave NBC than shift to midnight with Jay taking the 11:30 slot was fighting a war over an eggshell.  Johnny's show isn't Johnny's show anymore - timeslots, networks, all vestiges of a different world.  Perhaps - but Conan, on one of Larry King's final shows this month, alluded to a conversation he had with Johnny back in 2004 when the decision was made that he'd be taking the show from Jay; and my sense of things are perhaps Conan took from that conversation something different - the idea that he was carrying on Johnny's legacy; that when Conan wrote that open letter saying he wouldn't take part in the destruction of the Tonight Show - he wasn't just talking about moving it to midnight - he was talking about the entire Jay Leno era.  I think perhaps as Dave left his conversation with Johnny believing that he wouldn't really be taking Johnny's Tonight Show, he'd be taking Jay's - and that wasn't worth staying at NBC - that Conan left his conversation with Johnny thinking it wasn't some DVR'd block of corporately sponsored time that he was fighting for - nor was it the legacy of Jaywalking or the Dancing Itos - that Conan was making a stand for Johnny Carson's Tonight Show.  Maybe that's still not worth it - but it's an area of analysis perhaps Bill Carter could have more strongly considered.

-The Kids Are All Right - I didn't love it; it was fine, but no better than other Mark Ruffalo films; and if one wanted to place it within the "lesbians sure do secretly crave dick" canon I'm not sure I'd object. 

-The Michael Cera is in a Video Game movie.  The fight scenes were disinteresting to me; I'm not anti-video game, just agnostic; I like Cera and I'm a sucker for a film that is playfully directed; so you could pair this with 500 Days of Summer and I'm watching.

Incidentally - on both the latter discs (which I watched via Netflix) there were no special features - instead, clicking on special features led to a screen which said "hey, if you want any of this stuff, you gotta buy the disc".  A significant bummer.  I love me some special features but will not buy a disc to watch them and probably don't care enough about them to look for them through other avenues. 

4. I Read the Books
I read a terrific bio this week Forty Minutes of Hell: The Extraordinary Life of Nolan Richardson It did what I like books to do, really placed Richardson in a broader social context - it's instructive, for example, to see the matter of fact racism of Frank Broyles, to recall that Richardson, in 1985 was the first black coach in any major sport in the SEC - it is very clear to see, in 2010, how much of the way that Richardson was understood by sports media was through a racial prism.  At the time, had you raised that idea (as I did) you would have been running hard against the mainstream narrative.  But that's what we clearly do - when events are occuring, our view is whatever is happening is what should be happening - that we had immorality in the past, but in the present, such attitudes are only on the fringes - and in fact - it's pointing out racial disparity that is the real problem.  We said that in 1985 - we said it 20 years before during the civil rights movement - and we say it today.  It's only looking back that the mainstream narrative becomes "there sure was a lot of racism we didn't see back in 1985 - good thing we're beyond that now" - without any recognition that (1) there were people who saw it then and (2) just as we were incapable of casting a critical eye on ourselves then, so are we today.  Within the discussion of what happened in the 2010 midterms - all the talk about the rise of the tea party and whatnot - consider instead the following:

The first black President got elected in 2008.

And the south made the Democrats pay in 2010.  To the tune of 19 House members and a Senator lost.

After this week’s elections, the Democratic Party barely holds a presence in the region outside of majority-black urban areas such as Atlanta and Memphis. The carnage for the party was particularly brutal in the Deep South, where just one white Democrat survived across Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia and South Carolina.

If I'm still teaching US History in 25 years - when I talk about 2010, it won't be about the "tea party" - it will be about the push/pull of racial politics in the US - it'll be about the Southern Strategy, about the questioning of the Civil Rights Act by a soon to be Senator from Kentucky, about talk of secession by the Governor of Texas, about lawsuits from southern, white Republican attorney generals to nullify federal legislation - about the systematic attempt to delegitimize the first black President since the day of his election - and about white, southern voters coming to the polls at the midterm to vote for Republicans. 

5. And I'll Probably Mention This




In 25 years, opposition to the repeal of Don't Ask, Don't Tell will look like opposition to the desegregation of the military.  Like opposition to the Civil Rights Act.  And the right wing then will attempt to say that they were the real proponents of gay rights, just as they attempt to say they were the real proponents of rights for blacks and women.  The right wing only exists because enough people lack the ability to separate facts from threats.

And the reaction from Christian hate groups will be treated the same way we treated those who opposed civil rights for blacks.

6.  Another Thought Experiment


This week, the Republicans blocked The Child Marriage Prevention Act.

This week, the Republicans blocked Health Benefits for 9-11 Responders.

Imagine if it were Democrats.  Imagine if it were Democrats.  How deeply burned into your brain would Fox News (with mainstream media right behind them) make these two votes - Democrats are pro child abuse; ten year olds are being forced into marriage and the Democrats don't care.  Brave Americans sacrificed on 9-11 and Democrats don't care.

Which was a bigger news story - that someone wanted to build a mosque near ground zero - or that Republicans blocked health benefits for 9-11 Responders?

Why do you suppose that is?  If the right wing wants a controversy - they get a controversy.  If the right wing wants the entire country talking about 9-11, it gets what it wants.

Or - consider Elizabeth Smart.

That's a tremendous Mother Jones piece about Mormons and child marriage - when Elizabeth Smart is kidnapped and held as a sexual prisoner, the way media processes that is that there are some evil, sick, twisted people in the world.

Here's the thing - those specific evil, sick, twisted people - sure did like to quote the Bible an awful lot.

Make it the Koran.  Make the kidnappers of Elizabeth Smart Muslim.  Make her a child bride taken because Allah requires it.

What is the story about then?  Just a random act of the sick, evil and twisted - unconnected with religion - unconnected with a bigger theme?  Is that the story?  Does anyone possibly believe that?

7. Sometimes They Tell the Truth
Spencer Bachus, the new chair of the Financial Services Committee, gave us a preview of how the Republicans will govern in the next Congress:

In Washington, the view is that the banks are to be regulated, and my view is that Washington and the regulators are there to serve the banks,” 


8. But Generally They Lie
Non partisan Politifact named their Lie of 2010 this week.

So many to choose from.

But they chose government takeover of health care.

9. And Then C.T. Choked Everyone Out




An all woman team finally won the Amazing Race..  No, it's neither the game - nor the show - that MTV's Challenge is - but it's pretty damn good nonetheless.

10. The World Champion San Francisco Giants




This arrived at my house this week.

That's all for this time.  I'll see you next time...if there is a next time...

Blogger Template created by Just Blog It