Pages

Tell Me Again About Big Government

Saturday, July 25, 2009



Harvard Professor Henry Louis Gates was arrested in his own home after the officer had become aware that Gates was, in fact, the homeowner.

That's not in dispute.

But yet, conservatives - the same people who devote their lives to opposing big government, so devoted to their opposition that they'd rather continue with the health care status quo of having 47 million uninsured Americans than have nationalized health care - have immediately leapt to the side of the police. This is less "he said, he said" than we're told - it seems like both sides of the story are pretty similar. Gates chewed out the cop who was standing in his house. There's no allegation of physical threat; Gates yelled at a cop. Not on the street. Not as the cop was patrolling. Yelled at a cop while standing inside his own home. And was arrested after showing his ID.

"Disorderly conduct" is a terrific catch all crime - it basically gives cover to police to arrest anyone for virtually any behavior. It expands police authority. It's the definition of big government.

Truth is - conservatives love big government, they lick it up, as long as that big government is in someone else's house.

You try to raise the minimum wage and conservatives yell "big government" - you try to regulate how much businesses can pollute the envivonment and conservatives scream "big government" - you try to tax multi-millionaire estates and conservatives scream "big government". Hell, they fight 3 day waiting periods to buy guns. Who is the government to keep me from my armor piercing bullets for 3 days? Goddamn liberals.

But government inside a woman's uterus? That's where it belongs. Government in the bedroom of consenting adults? Absolutely. Government standing in the way of two men or two women who want the same equal protection as heterosexuals? Block that kiss, government. Reading my email? Government's job. Listening to my phone calls? Government's job.

Years ago I had a student - who would rail, just get passionately angry about the Florida regulations that pop up occasionally regarding how much one can water one's lawn. Hated it. Saw it as big government invading his life.

But that same student was adamently pro death penalty. Thought the biggest problem with the death penalty was the appeals took too long.

And he never saw any disconnect between those thoughts. Government conserving water = too much government. Government executing people? Only problem is it's too slow.

It's the American way. As a recent Washington Post poll demonstrated - Americans are now in favor of torture (and what's more big government than trillion dollar foreign wars?) as long as it's Americans doing the torturing.

Immorality is when something we don't like happens to us.

Consider this - if it's Rush Limbaugh and a black cop - exactly the same factual scenario - to the letter - what's the reaction?

You know when you're allowed to use deadly force to defend yourself? Conservatives have successfully won the fight in many states (including Florida) to define the reasonable use of deadly force in self defense to any situation where an intruder is in your house. Doesn't matter if he's armed or not - doesn't matter if he's actually threatening to attack you or not - the idea is that an intruder in your house is inherently threatening to your life.

Shoot first, ask questions later is an acceptable defense when you're in your home.

Here's Professor Gates, in his home. He didn't shoot the cop. Didn't threaten to. Didn't make any physically threatening move in any way. He yelled at him.

And he got arrested.

And the conservatives, those great defenders of the "king of the castle" idea - those most opposed to expansive government power -

They have risen against Gates. Obama is a "militant" with a "chip on his shoulder" says Rush Limbaugh.

Conservatives love them some big government. As long as it's in your house.

I don't know what the percentage of white professors there are as opposed to black professors. It's an extreme disparity, I believe.

But yet - I can't recall ever reading about a white professor arrested in his own home under these fact circumstances.

Probably it's the power black and Hispanic media covering it up. Probably an ACORN/Sotamayor conspiracy. Another example of that reverse discrimination conservatives love to talk about.

Especially since last November.

Get Up Stand Up, Stand Up for Your Rights.

Friday, July 24, 2009



From Monday's InsideHigherEd came this.

I have no judgment if the Macalester football player, Jacob Bond, is telling the truth.  A lawsuit filed is not a lawsuit proven.  But his allegations hit upon what readers of mine know is bound to draw a wellspring of virtually lifelong anger - that being compulsory flag salute.  For those who don't click the link - here's the shorthand; Bond was on the football team at Macalester College in 2k6; during a practice, the national anthem was being played on an adjacent field in an activity unrelated to the football practice.  An assistant coach told the team to take off their helmets for the anthem.  Bond refused.  The next day he was off the team.

This is a bright line for me; an area where I see no shades of grey.  The idea that someone in a position of power thinks he should be compelling flag salute is abhorrent to me.  That someone operating from what he believes is a position of patriotism - of love of what America (the land of the free) stands for thinks that expression of that love of freedom and liberty should be required strikes me entirely backward.  And, for purposes of this blog, which was created to use sports to talk about everything, that we continue to see Craig Hodges get blackballed and Mahmoud Abdul Rauf have his house burned down, and Toni Smith receive death threats and (if true) college Jacob Bond get kicked off his football team just for having the temerity to be athletes who refuse to follow political orthodoxy is sad.  Sad to me that in the "most free country on earth" I can't attend a sporting event without being expected to salute a political symbol. And that type of establishmentarian political speech occurs without comment or criticism in every venue, in every sport, no matter high or low, and exists without comment. But anyone in the sports universe who criticizes the establishment - who takes a stand against power - they are subject to the full wrath of the Sports Industrial Complex.

It's easy for John Carlos and Tommie Smith to be acknowledged 40 years after the fact as civil rights pioneers, but at the time they were labeled as militant traitors who had defiled the flag.  The Associated Press called it a "nazi like salute".  Brent Musburger, who I never heard say anything more controversial than "backdoor cover" called them "black skinned stormtroopers".

We love activism.  As long as it's past.  We worship Muhammad Ali as a civic treasure.  Now that he can't talk. 

But present day anti-war protests?  Present day activism?  Present day discussion of race?

Athletes are told to shut up and play.  Michael Jordan said "Republicans buy shoes too" and any atheltic expression that steps outside of those corporatized parameters is instantly labeled as off limits.

Hell, even Presidents are told to shut up and play - the Republicans have already sent out a fundraising mailer about Obama's criticism of the Cambridge cop who arrested an African-American Harvard professor for breaking into his own home.  And Rush Limbaugh said Obama's comments were those of a "black militant" (demonstrating that Rush clearly has spent very little time with actual black militants.  Probably a good choice for him.)  Limbaugh later, talking to Greta Van Susteren said

 "Let’s face it, President Obama’s black, and I think he’s got a chip on his shoulder."

Rush is awesome. 

(this is the part where I can shoehorn a blog from the other place before they vanish forever.  It's sort of fun!).

A year ago, I wrote the following about Josh Howard:


Josh Howard's a forward for the Dallas Mavericks. He's good.

Howard was at a charity football game in July, joking with a group of other young African-American men during the singing of the national anthem. Howard says about the song, "I don't celebrate that shit, I'm Black."

And then he makes a positive reference to Obama in '08.

Howard's been in trouble, that low level of trouble that when young athletes get into, they get hung with a "he's got questionable character" rap - he's had a speeding ticket; he's admitted to marijuana use - drug use drives sports fans bonkers and makes sports writers foam at the mouth; the element of the steroid era that underpins all of it and has been discussed remarkably little is how much of the media/public reaction is based on our demonization of particular types of drugs. Steroids have been placed in the "drugs only bad people take" box along with marijuana; whereas painkillers (like the kind I'm on right now! So good! So warm and fresh and good! Yeah!  These Marley songs really have an entirely different meaning when you're high.  Did anyone know that?) are a-okay.

And that's the context in which both the immediate news piece and the discussion from Outside the Lines this afternoon placed Howard's comments. Two young African-American sportswriters served as the panel on the program, Kevin Blackistone and Scoop Jackson - neither representing the heavily reactionary preponderance of sports analysts - but both of them talked about Howard as clearly troubled; about his comments as a problem for his employers and their corporate paymasters - the debate became on how heavily he'd be punished - fined? Suspended? Traded?


So - let me understand.


On your own time - in front of just a cell phone - you can't say you don't celebrate the Star Spangled Banner?

It can't be that political expression of all types is verboeten; sports is inextricably linked with politics - hell, this was, note, a football field on which Howard was standing; he was responding to a question about why he wasn't giving the socially required loyalty stance (hat off in silent deference to the political institution that is the United States government). It was a lack of the right kind of political expression that Howard was responding to.

Today is the 221st anniversary of the signing of the US Constitution; if the Constiution has any value, it is in its protection of our civil liberties; our essential freedoms that we earn not by being Americans, but by being alive - the aspect of the creation of the United States that mattered in the sweep of human history, was that it was founded under principles of the Enlightenment, that the rhetoric used in the founding documents like the Declaration of Independence, Common Sense, and the Constitution is that this country (and all countries) only exist to serve their people; we only have and only need governments in order to serve our better interests; the establishment exists for us, we don't exist to serve the establishment. That was the hallmark of feudalism that western society has abandoned in the Enlightenment.

In 1940, Supreme Court Justice Harlan Stone wrote the following:

The guarantees of civil liberty are but guarantees of freedom of the human mind and spirit and of reasonable freedom and opportunity to express them...The very essence of the liberty which they guarantee is the freedom of the individual from compulsion as to what he shall think and what he shall say.

This idea, this idea that one should be punished for giving insufficient deference to the symbols of the United States government, it's flags - it's songs - is precisely contrary to the very beliefs of which those songs and flags are allegedly symbolic.

Josh Howard didn't say "death to America." He didn't say "I loved me some 9/11."

He said - I'm Black, so I don't celebrate that.

I've discussed race in this space before; not only race as an historic ugly part of our country's past (the Constitution that we celebrate today delcared that Blacks were 3/5 of a human being) but as part of our present reality (African-American families earn 58 cents on the dollar that white families earn, less than 35 years ago; not coincidentally, those 35 years have seen two Democratic Presidents, both of them conservative Democrats).

And Howard didn't just say that - he said Obama in '08.


Howard isn't saying this country is beyond repair. He said my voice has been insufficiently heard; there is a candidate who I believe will make this country better - make it into the kind of country whose symbols I might believe better represent me.


Obama in '08.


Now, sure - he did not communicate this message in a serious way. This wasn't a debate, not a speech to an elementary school - he wasn't wearing a suit and quoting Harlan Stone and using polysyllabic words. He was hanging out with guys, making jokes during the national anthem.


And sure, it's hugely unlikely that, once his employer speaks to him, that he'll offer this defense. He'll apologize, face whatever discipline there might be. He'll say he was joking, spoke flippantly, and if he offended anyone he deeply apologizes and will never do it again.


'Cause that's what we do. (edit, and that's exactly what happened, and exactly why this went away)

And given that we spend more time talking about flag pins in this country than our Gilded Age levels of inequality, Obama, if he has any comment at all, will decry the remarks, and say all Americans should salute the flag regardless of political beliefs.

And sportswriters, radio talk show hosts, fans, as they spin through this the next couple of days will trash Howard for earning millions of dollars playing basketball and then mentioning race.

And then it will go away until we can beat up someone else for being insufficiently subservient to the majesty that is King America. (edit - I'm right sometimes)

But before that happens - let me offer this.

I'm not Black. Other than being a non-theist, I don't belong to any group marginalized in American society.

I don't like standing for the Star Spangled Banner. It feels compulsory, conforming to group behavior as we give an oath of obedience to a political institution. I just want to watch the game, not have to assent to the belief that the United States is the "land of the free and the home of the brave."

I'll have a political discussion with you; about freedom, liberty, justice and the distance between rhetoric and reality in American ideals.

But not at the game. At the game, I'd rather just watch the game.

And my watching the game shouldn't require that I give an assent to your political views. It could be that even after a long discussion - we'd still fundamentally disagree on what the United States means, what any country, really, as a geopolitical unit means - it could be that our views of American history, our assessments of the current United States government are really divergent - maybe even too divergent for us to be cool with each other.

This does not bother me.

I would never - ever want to compel you to stand for something you didn't believe - never say "put your hand over your heart and attest to matters you don't think are true."

That's the opposite of what America is supposed to stand for. And I'm an American, like Josh Howard.

So consider the following proposition - if you see someone not standing for the Star Spangled Banner, or with his hand not over his heart during the Pledge of Allegiance - consider that you and he may believe different things, and as an American, consider that neither one of you should be fined, suspended, or traded for those beliefs.

Unless they're gonna deal him to Golden St. 'Cause my Warriors could use another big (edit, not so much anymore with the emergence of Randolph - although Wright's pretty good too and Nellie's too Nellie to see it.  Goddamn GSW.  Why you hate me Warriors?  I loves you so hard and you hate me!  They fired Mullin and Mitch Rich in the same summer!  Goddamn Warriors.  If I were a different cat this would be the time I'd sell my NBA fan loyalty on ebay.  But I can't - you want a flag I salute - I salute my goddamn Golden St. Warriors.  They haven't won a title since before my NBA memory.  And my Giants have never won a Series since the move west in '58.  And my Niners...well, we got five, so screw all of you.  Yeah!  5!  5!  5!  Suck on that!  Where was I...)

Besides, This Land is Your Land is a better song anyway. That's a song I could stand for.

Your Athlete of the Month - July (yes, July 2009), And Athletes of the Year 1990-2008

Thursday, July 23, 2009




I'm in the process of shifting the blogs from the old place back over to the new/old place; so if you've stumbled over here via general search and are unfamiliar with the deal, you'd find it curious to read my prediction about the 2008 election, for example (hey, I didn't say the revelations would come before the events.  You think I'm some sort of Nostrprognosticator or somethin'?)

Since January of 1990, I've recorded an Athlete of the Month (actually, I started about 10 years before, but the records I've manged to keep from my misspent, largley solitary youth, only go back to January 10 1990).  I'm sort of systematic - I pick an athlete each week (48 weeks in the year, I fudge a little when needed) an athlete each month (never repeating the same athlete in the same year) and then an athlete of the year.

For July - your Athlete of the Month is Mark Buehrle (is Wise's catch the greatest defensive play in a perfect game in MLB history?)


Runners Up - Serena Williams, Roger Federer, Georges St. Pierre

Previous Winners for 2009:
January - Larry Fitzgerald
February - Santonio Holmes
March - Maya Moore
April - LeBron James
May - Lionel Messi
June - Roger Federer

Previous Winners:
1990 - Joe Montana
1991 - Michael Jordan
1992 - Mario Lemieux
1993 - Michael Jordan
1994 - George Foreman
1995 - Hakeem Olajuwon
1996 - Michael Jordan
1997 - Tiger Woods
1998 - Mark McGwire
1999 - Tiger Woods
2000 - Tiger Woods
2001 - Barry Bonds
2002 - Barry Bonds
2003 - Lance Armstrong
2004 - Peyton Manning
2005 - Reggie Bush
2006 - Roger Federer
2007 - Tom Brady
2008 - Usain Bolt

I haven't posted the monthly/weekly breakdowns for previous years, but I suppose they are available upon request.  Please call before you stop by.

Lebron James = Kurt Angle

No, not because Jeff Jarrett is shacking up with one of LeBron's ex's. But don't give them any ideas.

LeBron James got dunked on a couple of weeks ago; perhaps you heard about it. The clip is here.

You don't need to see it; it's an ordinary dunk. Nike's burial of the video until now is what gave it any sort of traction at all; from all appearances, Nike attempted to protect the reputation of the greatest basketball player on the planet by making what would otherwise have been a 30 second midshow Pardon the Interruption story into the 13 1/2 minute gap in the Nixon tapes.

And what it brought to my mind was this.

In November of '04, an absolute no one, a blank slate, a kid without a contract named Daniel Puder locked up Kurt Angle on Smackdown. It was a singular confluence of events; Angle still had the veneer of credibility that came with his being a gold medal winning amateur wrestler; UFC had penetrated the WWF/E fanbase just enough that Puder's submission maneuver wasn't inherently obvious to more than a handful but could have been framed in a potentially explosive way.

In an increasingly corporatized, whitewashed, pre-planned, wrinkle-free entertainment landscape - what you live for is the wildcard - it's something that isn't like everything else - something that feels different. For the WWF/E, that would be something that feels real. What is it that UFC has that the WWE clearly doesn't have that would cause its audience to have spent the 4 1/2 years since Puder/Angle bleeding away? It feels more real. It feels more alive. It feels more raw (pun intended). If I'm Dana White, there's nothing more I love than the actual, real human animosity generated toward Brock Lesnar after UFC 100. He's not like everyone else; he's a live wire and people will pay to see what happens next. And if I'm Vince McMahon, when handed the opportunity to tell a story I've never told before, with exactly the right types of people at exactly the right time - a story that feels fresh and new and real - it's the best thing that's happened in years.

Except it wasn't.

WWF/E pretended it didn't happen. Made it go away.

Nike didn't. It took a couple of weeks of bad press, but now it's out and it's fine (apparently, TMZ bought a tape). Fast forward five years, Nike will be fine; James will be fine; UFC will be fine; and hopefully WWE will still be around and occasionally I'll get to pop for Steve Regal.

The last time I saw something raw - moneymaking - on television it was Artie Lange's appearance on the Joe Buck show, which, as I've written previously, was instantly reminiscent of Lange's boss, Howard Stern's, infamous spot on Arsenio. Lange also had a wrestling connection that I wrote about previously - and that gives me the opportunity to close this with a brief repost:

Mad TV has never been funny. I'm a bit of a sketch comedy snob; if there's ever been a worse long running sketch program than Mad TV its existence eludes me.

That said, I watched it last evening. I watch final episodes of shows. I watched the last Nanny despite never having seen even a second of it prior to that. This tells you all you need to know about me.

Mad TV is taped and had a pretty mediocre bit by former cast member Artie Lange.

I like Artie Lange. I listen to Stern every day. Actually, I listen to all of the Sterns on one day, 'cause I own a computer and it's easier to do that way.

I watch SNL every week; clicking the label would lead you to my all time cast.

SNL (which is also not to be confused with state of the art sketch comedy - really, you're comparing really good fast food with really crappy fast food when thinking about the two shows...maybe SNL is Arbys and Fox is Checkers; there's a qualitative difference but if you were to say they're both largely nutritionless and there's no point in drawing that line, I wouldn't put up a tremendous defense) had its season ending show last night. Lots of people stopped by in one form or another - Tom Hanks (who maybe has lost his funny...developing) Amy Poehler, Maya Rudolph, Anne Hathaway (Mmmmm), Fred Armisen's supercool fiance or maybe now wife Elisabeth Moss (I'm not hatin' on Armisten, but this is a Lyle and Julia situation) Norm MacDonald and Norm's good buddy Artie Lange.

I can't be the only person who saw that and immediately thought of Rick Rude appearing on the taped RAW and the live Nitro the same night.

Lange even shaved his beard! On Mad TV he had a beard and then was clean shaven on Nitro...er...SNL.

It's too bad Mad TV is gone now, 'cause what would be good is if they brought out Harvey Whippleman next week (or was it a lookalike midget? Vince only has a couple of go-to moves and I've forgotten which one he pulled out) dressed in a fat suit to show how easy Artie would be to replace.

Repost: Get to Know Me!

Wednesday, July 22, 2009


I'm a San Francisco Giants fan. We're never going to win the World Series.

I hope that's not why I'm a San Francisco Giants fan. I think I'm a San Francisco Giants fan because when I was seven years old, my grandfather took me to Candlestick Park and I saw the Giants lose to the Reds.

I think I'm a San Francisco Giants fan because of Mays and McCovey and Clark and the greatest hitter who ever lived, Barry Motherfucking Bonds.

Okay, let me back up. I finished third grade in the spring of '79; now, I don't know which year of school you consider your favorite—maybe 11th grade when you lost your virginity after the junior prom...or your sophomore year in college when you lost your virginity after a particularly inspired coffeehouse reading of "Sailing to Byzantium"...or maybe it was the morning you were supposed to defend your Masters thesis on civil disobedience ("I Don't Believe In Beatles, I Just Believe In Me") but instead drove to Tijuana and lost your virginity in a back alley to a nine-dollar transsexual Latina hooker who kept screeching, "Chu better pay me, Yim Yividen!"


Me? My favorite year of school was third grade. Feel free to draw your own conclusions. Heh, Heh, Heh.

I'm not really sure why; my teacher, Mr. Callan, gave us candy for good grades and I still have a weathered certificate as evidence of a victorious class election; but that really doesn't explain why, as I walked home after the last day of school with the sing-song sounds of my classmates...

No more pencils/No more books
No more teacher's dirty looks

... ringing in my ears, I began to weep uncontrollably. As I reached my house I was stopped by my grandfather:

"What's the matter?"

"Third grade is...gone."

I was just about start the third grade when I went to that first game at Candlestick Park in the fall of 1978. My grandfather took me as would he throughout the season. Giants vs. Reds! Knepper on the mound! Hot dog in my hand! Cap on my head! Blanket across my lap! We lost 5 to 2!

I vividly remember a McCovey pinch-double and, earlier, my absolute shock at seeing a man in a Cincinnati cap shout with joy, "The Reds are runnin'!" as the not-as-Big-as-they-used-to-be-but-still-Bigger-than-us Red Machine strung together a few extra-base hits.

I thought everyone was a Giants fan. Well, every adult, anyway; I didn't really have any friends who were Giants fans (and I was the only 'Niners fan in four counties, so a little perspective is a good thing). My grandfather said that was because my friends were just kids and their skulls hadn't fully hardened yet.

He didn't say that, but he should have, 'cause that's a good line.


I think that's why I'm a San Francisco Giants fan—why my only ever fight was in a crowded stadium parking lot in Miami after Game 2 of the 1997 National League Division Series with a Marlin fan (got my ass kicked)—why, when I was 8, you could have convinced me that Los Angeles Dodger first baseman Steve Garvey ate babies (I met him in 2000, good dude) why I still blame myself for our blowing a 5 run lead with 8 outs to go in the 2002 World Series. (I was upstairs and when Dusty gave Ortiz the ball I went downstairs, I still can't talk about it. Converse amongst yourselves while I compose myself.)

But there might be another reason.


You know the Great Pumpkin? Charles Schulz was a Giants fan, and there's a theory that the Great Pumpkin which rises up out of the pumpkin patch that it finds to be the most sincere, was a Giants allegory (Halloween, like the Series, is in the fall—the Giants, like the pumpkin patch, are orange).

Linus is never going to see the Great Pumpkin. The Giants are never going to win the World Series. But yet, I sit in that pumpkin patch with my blanket, every single year (we got the Unit; if we don't peddle Sanchez, that's a real strong rotation - the pen might hold up with Affeldt; and if we get Manny...)

A Giants fan of another era was discussed in the fabulous opening chapter of Don DeLilo's book Underworld.

"He knows how to find the twisty compensation in the business of losing, being a loser, drawing it out, expanding it, making it sickly sweet, being someone carefully chosen for the role."

You don't know me, gentle reader. We weren't in 9th grade together. We've never had hot, nasty sex until our bodies dissolved into puddles. We've never stayed up all night taking care of my cat after another trip to the vet.

But that quote right there, that shit rings an uncomfortably familiar bell. You feel me?

A couple years ago, I had lunch with a buddy of mine and confessed that I was rooting for the United States in the World Cup. He guffawed, as I'm unlikely to ever root for the United States in any international competition; and upon my explanation that U.S. soccer is so historically marginalized that rooting for it is hardly supporting the American Empire, his response was that I just identify with underdogs.

Huh. That's...Huh.


I don't think he's right; I think it's less that I identify with the downtrodden than the other side of the coin, which is that I absolutely loathe the big foot. See...I was trained to be a gladiator.

This seems like hyperbole, of course, because it is; even as a younger man, I was largely a frightened guy in an ill-fitting suit trying to stay a step ahead of the Bar Association's disciplinary committee. A criminal defense attorney is taught to love and fear the god-like power of the State. He stands as the sole force opposed to the exercise of that power upon his client.


He is the Superego forever trying to moderate the primal urges of the prosecutorial Id; without the attorney, the client, and by extension, all of us, are devoured by the machine that goes by itself. The truest thing I have ever read about the law was written by Robert Cover in a piece for the Yale Law Journal entitled "Violence and the Word":


"Legal interpretation takes place in a field of pain and death. A judge articulates her understanding of a text, and, as a result, somebody loses his freedom, his property, his children, even his life."


Cover recognized that the law is drenched in blood; debates about legal realism vs. positivism might be conducted in ivory towers, but their impact is on the ground; it is in the lifting of eighth grader Mary Beth Tinker's suspension for wearing a black armband in protest of the Vietnam War; it is in Herman Marion Sweatt, a black postal worker, being allowed to attend the University of Texas Law School in 1950.

It's 2K9 and, my brothers and sisters, I'm sorry, but you gotsta pick a side—you have to root for your team—and either you root for the one dude, standing alone, just trying to express herself or live his life, or you stand with the machine. Either you see Bill O' Reilly attack Jeremy Glick and you cheer him on or you recoil. Either you stand up for the lifelong committed gay couple who want their relationship respected by the state as equally as heterosexual relationships, or you say "God hates fags" and look to amend the constitution to stop them. Either you see that George Bush frat boy swagger and say, as supposedly left-centrist commentator Chris Matthews did, "Everybody sort of likes the President, except for the real whack-jobs" or you wonder how many hundreds of thousand of civilians a dude has to kill before his habit of handing out nicknames to casual acquaintances becomes a little less endearing.

I don't care which side you pick. I just want you to see Spoon Millionaires (http://www.spoonmillionaires.com/) But you gotta pick a side, and you're kidding yourself if you think you don't.


A couple years ago, an 11th grade public school student in south Florida was suspended for refusing to comply with a district rule (a Florida state statute, actually) that he stand and recite the Pledge of Allegiance.

That statute's unconstitutional, and has been found such, which I knew it would be, leading to my writing a letter to the editor of the same area newspaper which later interviewed me to talk a little Spoons, explaining the story of Jehovah's Witness schoolchildren, twelve year old Lillian and ten year old William Gobitas, who, in 1935, refused to salute the American flag at their school in Minersville, Pennsylvania, a tiny town north of Philadelphia which was almost ninety percent Catholic. For Lillian, this meant giving up her status as class president and losing most of her friends. "When I'd come to school," she said, "they would throw a hail of pebbles and yell things like, 'Here comes Jehovah!' William's fifth grade teacher attempted to physically force his arm out of his pocket to make the requisite salute. (The high school junior in south Florida, when questioning his teacher, was told, "I have a big desk, you have a little desk, so you do what I say." The idea that, in any sense of the word, some high school English teacher has a "big desk" makes those of us who teach for a living weep at the lack of self-awareness that displays.) The children's father, Walter—a lifelong Minersville resident and proprietor of the town grocery store—filed suit in federal district court, claiming violation of his children's right to freely exercise their religion. Gobitas won at both the local and the appellate levels, but in an 8-1 decision announced on June 3, 1940, he lost at the U.S. Supreme Court. Only Harlan Stone bravely dissented from the majority's decision in Gobitis (the misspelling is a lower court's, not mine):


"The guarantees of civil liberty are but guarantees of freedom of the human mind and spirit and of reasonable freedom and opportunity to express them...The very essence of the liberty which they guarantee is the freedom of the individual from compulsion as to what he shall think and what he shall say... "

Take a moment to consider that, please. If we have any freedoms worth all the killing and dying soldiers have done, aren't they exactly that; the freedoms to think and say what you wish? And, maybe more importantly, to not say words you don't wish to say?

The reaction in south Florida (the most liberal area on this side of the Mason-Dixon line) was overwhelmingly against the high school junior, against the court which would correctly side with him, against, well, me, as letter writer and member of the organization (American Civil Liberties Union) which successfully filed the suit that would overturn the Florida law. "There's a war, people die for your freedoms, if the government says give the Pledge of Allegiance, then give the fucking Pledge of Allegiance."


Man, I do not understand that. I understand why you want to say the Pledge of Allegiance, but I will never understand why you want to make me do it. What possible meaning does "pledging allegiance" possibly have if you only do it under threat of punishment? While "rain on your wedding day" illustrates nothing more than a failure to read the Farmer's Almanac; let me suggest that forcing someone, at threat of a school suspension, to say the words, "freedom, liberty, and justice for all" is the definition of ironic. Don't you think?

"Say you're free! Say you're free cocksucker! You better say you're free or you're suspended! I have a big desk, you have a little desk; say you're free and do it right fucking now!"

Honestly, if you saw that in an 80's movie, with say, some plucky young dude fighting a doddering old and possibly corrupt Sheriff or Dean or Minister Who Hates Dancing, you'd all know, all of you, who the good guy was and who the bad guy was. All of you.


But even in my county—the most progressive part of the South—everyone lined up against this 11th grader the same way they all lined up against the Jehovah's Witnesses in the 30s. Reasonable people. Decent God fearing people said to me, "Well, what's the harm? They're only words."

They're only words. Then why are you so upset I don't want to say them?


That's the kind of thing that drives me out of my mind.

Fortunately, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed with me.


No, not this Supreme Court. No, that would be too forward thinking for the Supreme Court we have in 2009. I'm talking about the Supreme Court in 1943. You know, not during a period of heightened patriotism at all. 1943.

The United States Supreme Court heard the case of West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette in 1943. Writing for the 6-3 majority, Justice Robert Jackson emphasized that Marie and Gatha Barnette, more schoolchildren expelled for refusing to recite the Pledge, had not committed an act which directly affected anyone. "The freedom asserted," Jackson wrote, "does not bring them into collision with the rights asserted by any other individual... The sole conflict is between authority and the rights of an individual."


"If there is any fixed star in our constitutional constellation, it is that no official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinion or force citizens to confess by word or act their faith therein. If there are any circumstances which permit an exception, they do not now occur to us."


Those are some of my favorite words ever written in the English language. I think they're fucking beautiful.


I love me some Shakespeare; some Fitzgerald and Faulkner. I've read The Ballad of the Sad Cafe thirty times, because of which, if I am ever fortunate enough to meet a woman with such poor eyesight and judgment that she's willing to bear a child with me, I am so going to press the name Carson if it's a girl. When I read Prufrock...

I have heard the mermaids singing, each to each
I do not think that they will sing to me

that shit speaks to my core in the same way that "Breathe out, so I can breathe you in, hold you in" does.

But none of that is Justice Jackson, in the middle of fucking World War II, with the Nazis on the march and the American way of life actually at stake (as opposed to an obviously phony war which is solely about putting more dollars in the pockets of military contractors, oil executives, and the Saudi royal family, and keeping Americans afraid so they don't notice how much of their income they're giving away to the wealthy and how much of their liberty they're giving away to the White House) what did Jackson (by no means a wild-eyed leftist like myself) write?

He wrote—I don't care what the majority opinion is—not about your government, not about religion—not about nothing—those sons of bitches can't make you believe it—and they can't make you say it. They can't. It's the United States of By God America—we're different from those fascist, totalitarian regimes who are trying to take over the world—in this country, you don't need to live in fear of your fucking government. You don't work for them. They work for you. They don't spy on you. You oversee them. I don't care how many people say it's your duty to salute the flag. I don't care how many people say it's your duty to follow what the guy we think lives in the sky says. It's the United States—when they say "jump," feel free to say "fuck off".

The very purpose of a Bill of Rights was to withdraw certain subjects from the vicissitudes of political controversy, to place them beyond the reach of majorities and officials and to establish them as legal principles to be applied by the courts.
One's right to life, liberty, and property, to free speech, a free press, freedom of worship and assembly, and other fundamental rights may not be submitted to vote; they depend on the outcome of no elections.




Know what Jackson's saying there? Not everything is subject to vote. Even if there are a hundred thousand of you and only one of me, that doesn't mean you always win. That's why we have a Bill of Rights. Read them sometime. Not just the 2nd Amendment, which is the only one the 21st century conservatives have read. Read them all. Read the Establishment clause that says there's no national religion. You know, they could have made one—the framers of the Constitution certainly weren't adverse to putting forth their own interests (just like Aristotle said the best age for a man to get married was 37 and the best age for a woman was 18...and somehow he just happened to be a 37-year-old man who married an 18-year-old girl...the framers said only white, male property owners had the right to vote...and shockingly enough, they were all white, male property owners) they knew how to write into the Constitution exactly what best suited them...but despite that, not only didn't they say, "Oh, by the way, we're all Christians, Jesus is Lord, bow down and salute Him and then stand up and salute His flag." They said there is no national religion. The concept of the separation of church and state wasn't a creation of some liberal judge in the 60s, it was Jefferson's (who also created his own Bible, incidentally, by tearing out all the pages where Jesus was anything other than mortal—he thought that was bunk—and he's the one who wrote the Declaration of Independence that uses the phrase "...endowed by their Creator" the theocrats like so much.) Read the warrant requirement for searches and seizures and talk to me about random drug testing and NSA wiretaps. Read the due process amendments and tell me about Guantanamo. Read the absolute prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment and tell me about torture.

Read any of Jackson's opinion and tell me about compulsory flag salute—or all the censorship of the FCC—or the bills that are currently sweeping through legislatures to force any progressive, "non orthodox" thought out of classrooms—tell me again about compulsory flag salute or putting the ten commandments in courthouses. Evolution's as accepted within the scientific community as is the heliocrentric universe or the shape of the earth. In stark contrast to every other western nation, only 28% of Americans are able to accept that truth.


The previous President of the United States says, "The jury's still out on evolution."


No, it's not. It came in a more than a hundred fifty years ago; perhaps he really doesn't read the newspapers.


The disparity between American truths and "everywhere else truths" can be found in our inability to recognize the value of stem cell research, the immediate threat possessed by global warming, and the absolute catastrophe that is our continuing involvement in the Middle East. If you detect a religious component to all of that inability to accept truth, I won't dissuade you. Ron Suskind wrote a piece before the 2004 election in which he was told by a Bush official that the problem with the Eastern media was "they were in the reality based community."



The truth, a joke on the Daily Show once went, apparently has a "liberal bias."

You can believe in whatever you want. You can cheer on Rush, Hannity, Ann Coulter, or Bill O'Reilly. You can frame your gay bashing as "hating the sin, but loving the sinner" the same way your "greatest generation" grandparents said Martin Luther King was a communist puppet and it was those outside agitators who were stirrin' up trouble with their good coloreds. You can sneer and spit and scream whenever someone doesn't tearfully join you in a full throated rendition of whatever jingoistic chant or song that turns your crank. You can decide that we should build a big fence on our southern (as opposed to our northern, interestingly enough) border and pass laws prohibiting flag burning and use all the earth's resources because the guy you think lives in the sky says they're here for us to use. You can support torture and murder of the people we're supposed to be liberating. You can trade the 4th Amendment for security. You can oppose cervical cancer drugs and emergency contraception. You can believe that, despite the Inquisition, the Crusades, witchcraft trials, the genocide of the Native Americans, and that it's your 2,000 year old book that prescribes death as the punishment for nonbelievers (Deuteronomy 13:7-11), taking your lord's name in vain (Leviticus 24:16), and working on the Sabbath (Exodus 31:15), that yours is the religion of peace and goodness—and people like Gandhi (and eventually, even, somehow, people like me) are burning in hell even as you read this.


If I believed in a book that said you should die for your beliefs; if I supported public policy measures to enforce my beliefs on you because I had the numbers; if I had hundreds of years of history of persecuting you for your beliefs; and if I really believed, no matter how well I knew you that I was a more moral, more ethical, more righteous person than you are because I had a 2,000 year old book that told me so, you'd have me locked up. And if you say you wouldn't—if you say it wouldn't bother you if there were 92 of me for every one of you—if you say it wouldn't bother you if polls said people thought you were a bigger threat to the country than terrorists (True story; more Americans think atheists are a bigger problem to the country than think terrorists are such. True story.)—if you say it wouldn't bother you to have absolutely known your whole life that, because of your beliefs, you could never ever be President—if you say it wouldn't bother you to be afraid to express your beliefs out of concern you will be shunned, degraded, belittled, attacked, fired from your job, and completely marginalized in society—if you say it wouldn't bother you to always know that virtually everyone you ever met in your life held you in a little bit of contempt because what you saw when you looked into the sky wasn't what they saw...

...you'd be a little bothered. And if you say you wouldn't, you're a damn liar.



But hey, you can roll any way you need to roll. I'm a live and let live cat.


You can root for the Dodgers. You can think that Lance Armstrong is innocent. You can deny evolution. You can say the United States in the 21st century has been a moral force for good all around the world.


You can. But, brother, you're wrong. And it's not even close. I don't care how many of you there are. I don't care how loudly you chant. I don't care how many school boards, circuit courts, media conglomerates, and corporate boards you completely control even while you ridiculously claim persecution.


Build your 500 foot stone ten commandments. Put them in my fucking driveway.

I'll stay by myself in my pumpkin patch, thanks. I'm a very sincere boy, and y'all can get along fine without my kind. I won't say the sun revolves around the earth when it doesn't.









Unless it'll buy me a World Series. 'Cause, I'll flip like Wilson for a World Series.

Blogger Template created by Just Blog It