My American League ranks + explanation are here.
1B
1.Pujols
2.Fielder
3.Howard
4.Gonzalez
5.Votto
6. Dunn
7. Berkman
8. Lee
9. LaRoche
10. Loney
11. Huff
12. Helton
13. Jones
14. Murphy
15. Clement
16. Sanchez
2B
1.Utley
2. Phillips
3. Uggla
4. Weeks
5. Stewart
6. Johnson
7. Prado
8. Barmes
9. Polanco
10. Matsui
11. Iwamura
12. Sanchez
13. Schumaker
14. Kennedy
15. Fontenot
16. Baker
3B
1.Wright
2. Zimmerman
3. Reynolds
4. Sandoval
5. Cantu
6. Jones
7. Ramirez
8. Headley
9. McGehee
10. Glaus
11. Blake
12. Rolen
13. LaRoche
14. Hairston
15. Feliz
16. Freese
OF
1.Braun
2. Kemp
3. Upton
4. McLouth
5. Holliday
6. Werth
7. Bourn
8. Bay
9. Lee
10. Pence
11. Ethier
12. Bruce
13. McCutcheon
14. Gomez
15. Victorino
16. Ludwick
17. Hawpe
18. Gonzalez
19. Hart
20. Soriano
21. Morgan
22. Young
23. Coghlan
24. Ross
25. Rasmus
26. Fowler
27. Beltran
28. Ramirez
29. Milledge
30. Jackson
31. Stubbs
32. Blanks
33. Maybin
34. Ibanez
35. Byrd
36. Willingham
37. Rowand
38. Francouer
39. Cabrera
40. Schierholtz
41. Fukodome
42. Smith
43. Dickerson
44. Harris
45. SHairston
46. Venable
47. Hinske
48. Heyward
49. Church
50. Diaz
51. Spilborghs
52. Velez
P
1.Lincecum
2.Halladay
3. Haren
4. Wainwright
5. Johnson
6. Broxton
7. Hamels
8. Carpenter
9. Hanson
10. Santana
11. Nolasco
12. Rodriguez
13. Cain
14. Kershaw
15.Billingsley
16. Wagner
17. Street
18. Jimenez
19. Oswalt
20. Lilly
21. Wilson
22. Qualls
23. Hoffman
24. Gallardo
25. De La Rosa
26.Marmol
27. Cordero
28. Rodriguez
29. Sanchez
30. Dempster
31.Harang
32.Blanton
33. Dotel
34. Latos
35. Bell
36. Nunez
37. Jurrjens
38. Franklin
39. Lohse
40. Myers
41. Happ
42. Cueto
43. Capps
44. Zambrano
45. Jackson
46. Webb
47. Penny
48. Kuroda
49. Hudson
50. Lidge
51. Medlen
52. Lindstrom
53. Arroyo
54. Wolf
55. Madson
56. Padilla
57. Norris
58. Motte
59.Hammel
60.Wells
61. Kawakami
62.Garcia
63.Gorzelanny
64. Kennedy
65. Betancourt
66. Maholm
67. Zito
68. Lyon
69. Lannan
70. Adams
71. Romo
72. McClellan
73. Maine
74. Vandenhurk
75. Maine
76. Marquis
77. Saito
78. Kuo
79. Cook
80. Calero
81. Miller
82. Rhodes
83. Ohlendorf
84. Lowe
85. Sherill
86. Neise
87. Affledt
88. Correia
89. Strasberg
90. Buckner
2010 Fantasy Baseball Rankings - American League
Today's my first day off in 2010. I have one more exam to give tomorrow - then I'm taking the weekend off, I've got a full, hard week of work prep next week.
I'm backing up the Wrestlemania 26 preview to Thursday and/or Friday. With my 3 fantasy drafts coming, I had to prep - and since an unblogged about life is not worth leading, I thought I'd offer the results.
My AL Draft is first - 5x5 Weekly. I'm going to do position by position as opposed to an overall board as I tend to look at position choice as fluid dependent upon how each draft unfolds - but were, for some unknowable reason, people (that's you! You are people!) were to have questions (who to pick between OF X and 3b Y) I have answers. Players with multi position eligibility I've tried to just keep in one place for clairty.
1B
1.Cabrera
2.Teixeira
3.Morales
4.Morneau
5.Youkilis
6.Cuddyer
7.Butler
8.Swisher
9.Pena
10.Davis
11.Konerko
12. Branyan
13.Atkins
14.Johnson
15.Kotchman
16. Overbay
17.Barton
2B
1. Kinsler
2. Pedroia
3. Cano
4. Roberts
5. Zobrist
6. Hill
7. Lopez
8. Kendrick
9. Hudson
10. M Izturis
10. Ellis
11. Valbuena
12. Getz
13. Sizemore
14. Nix
SS
1. Jeter
2. Bartlett
3. ACabrera
4. Andrus
5. Ramirez
6. Aybar
7. Hardy
8. Scutaro
9. Pennington
10.Betancourt
11.C Izturis
12.J Wilson
13.Gonzalez
14. Everett
15. Harris
3B
1.Rodriguez
2.Longoria
3.Figgins
4.Young
5.Beckham
6.Tejada
7. Gordon
8.Teahan
9.Peralta
10 Beltre
11.Encarnacion
12. Kouzmanoff
13.Wood
14.Inge
C
1. Mauer
2. Martinez
3. Posada
4. Napoli
5. Suzuki
6. Weiters
7.Pierzynski
8.Laird
9.Buck
10.Saltalamacchia
11.Johnson
12.Navarro
13.Shoppach
14.Marson
15.Kendall
16.Pena
17. Teagarden
18.Moore
19.Mathis
20. Castro
OF
1.Crawford
2.Sizemore
3. Ellsbury
4. Upton
5. Cruz
6. Span
7. Abreu
8. Hunter
9. Davis
10.Pierre
11. Markakis
12. Choo
13. Lind
14. Quentin
15. Jones
16. Hamilton
17. Suzuki
18. Granderson
19.Rios
20.Gardner
21.Damon
22. Snider
23.Cameron
24.Gutierrez
25.Borbon
26.Dejesus
27.Reimold
28.Rivera
29.Kubel
30.Drew
31.Scott
32.Wells
33.Cust
34.Ordonez
35.Ankiel
36. Podsednik
37Jackson
38Young
39. Laporta
40.Crisp
41Guillen
42. Brantley
43.Bradley
44Sweeney
45. Batista
46Raburn
47Murphy
48. Pie
49. Byrnes
50. Rodriguez
51. Gross
52. Thames
P
1. Greinke
2. Verlander
3Lester
4.Beckett
5.Lee
6.Hernandez
7.Vazquez
8.Papelbon
9.Rivera
10.Sabathia
11.Soria
12. Shields
13. Lackey
14. Scherzer
15. Garza
16. RSoriano
17. Harden
18.Peavy
19.Anderson
20. Francisco
21. Bailey
22.Aardsma
23.Danks
24.Baker
25.Lewis
26.MGonzalez
27.Valverde
28.Buchholz
29.Burnett
30.Weaver
31.Floyd
32.Masterson
33.Duchscherer
34. Fuentes
35.Price
36.Kazmir
37.Niemann
38. Hughes
39.Jenks
40. Slowey
41. Sheets
42. Marcum
43. Wilson
44.Frasor
45.Buehrle
46.Santana
47.Rowland Smith
48.Liriano
49. Perez
50. Rauch
51. Bedard
52.Davis
53.Matsuzaka
54.Chamberlain
55.Pettitte
56.Braden
57. Thornton
58. Guerrier
59. Wood
60.Meche
61.Morrow
62.Matusz
63. Guthrie
64. Downs
65. Cahill
66. Snell
67. Bergeson
68. Pineiro
69. Pavano
70. Gregg
71. Bannister
72. Tillman
73. Wuertz
74. Millwood
75. Hochevar
76. Blackburn
77.Porcello
78. Feldman
79. Saunders
80. Wheeler
81. GGonzalez
82. Garcia
83. Rzepczynski
84. Wakefield
85. Bulger
86. Holland
87. Hellickson
88. Tejada
89. Okajima
90. Westbrook
I'm backing up the Wrestlemania 26 preview to Thursday and/or Friday. With my 3 fantasy drafts coming, I had to prep - and since an unblogged about life is not worth leading, I thought I'd offer the results.
My AL Draft is first - 5x5 Weekly. I'm going to do position by position as opposed to an overall board as I tend to look at position choice as fluid dependent upon how each draft unfolds - but were, for some unknowable reason, people (that's you! You are people!) were to have questions (who to pick between OF X and 3b Y) I have answers. Players with multi position eligibility I've tried to just keep in one place for clairty.
1B
1.Cabrera
2.Teixeira
3.Morales
4.Morneau
5.Youkilis
6.Cuddyer
7.Butler
8.Swisher
9.Pena
10.Davis
11.Konerko
12. Branyan
13.Atkins
14.Johnson
15.Kotchman
16. Overbay
17.Barton
2B
1. Kinsler
2. Pedroia
3. Cano
4. Roberts
5. Zobrist
6. Hill
7. Lopez
8. Kendrick
9. Hudson
10. M Izturis
10. Ellis
11. Valbuena
12. Getz
13. Sizemore
14. Nix
SS
1. Jeter
2. Bartlett
3. ACabrera
4. Andrus
5. Ramirez
6. Aybar
7. Hardy
8. Scutaro
9. Pennington
10.Betancourt
11.C Izturis
12.J Wilson
13.Gonzalez
14. Everett
15. Harris
3B
1.Rodriguez
2.Longoria
3.Figgins
4.Young
5.Beckham
6.Tejada
7. Gordon
8.Teahan
9.Peralta
10 Beltre
11.Encarnacion
12. Kouzmanoff
13.Wood
14.Inge
C
1. Mauer
2. Martinez
3. Posada
4. Napoli
5. Suzuki
6. Weiters
7.Pierzynski
8.Laird
9.Buck
10.Saltalamacchia
11.Johnson
12.Navarro
13.Shoppach
14.Marson
15.Kendall
16.Pena
17. Teagarden
18.Moore
19.Mathis
20. Castro
OF
1.Crawford
2.Sizemore
3. Ellsbury
4. Upton
5. Cruz
6. Span
7. Abreu
8. Hunter
9. Davis
10.Pierre
11. Markakis
12. Choo
13. Lind
14. Quentin
15. Jones
16. Hamilton
17. Suzuki
18. Granderson
19.Rios
20.Gardner
21.Damon
22. Snider
23.Cameron
24.Gutierrez
25.Borbon
26.Dejesus
27.Reimold
28.Rivera
29.Kubel
30.Drew
31.Scott
32.Wells
33.Cust
34.Ordonez
35.Ankiel
36. Podsednik
37Jackson
38Young
39. Laporta
40.Crisp
41Guillen
42. Brantley
43.Bradley
44Sweeney
45. Batista
46Raburn
47Murphy
48. Pie
49. Byrnes
50. Rodriguez
51. Gross
52. Thames
P
1. Greinke
2. Verlander
3Lester
4.Beckett
5.Lee
6.Hernandez
7.Vazquez
8.Papelbon
9.Rivera
10.Sabathia
11.Soria
12. Shields
13. Lackey
14. Scherzer
15. Garza
16. RSoriano
17. Harden
18.Peavy
19.Anderson
20. Francisco
21. Bailey
22.Aardsma
23.Danks
24.Baker
25.Lewis
26.MGonzalez
27.Valverde
28.Buchholz
29.Burnett
30.Weaver
31.Floyd
32.Masterson
33.Duchscherer
34. Fuentes
35.Price
36.Kazmir
37.Niemann
38. Hughes
39.Jenks
40. Slowey
41. Sheets
42. Marcum
43. Wilson
44.Frasor
45.Buehrle
46.Santana
47.Rowland Smith
48.Liriano
49. Perez
50. Rauch
51. Bedard
52.Davis
53.Matsuzaka
54.Chamberlain
55.Pettitte
56.Braden
57. Thornton
58. Guerrier
59. Wood
60.Meche
61.Morrow
62.Matusz
63. Guthrie
64. Downs
65. Cahill
66. Snell
67. Bergeson
68. Pineiro
69. Pavano
70. Gregg
71. Bannister
72. Tillman
73. Wuertz
74. Millwood
75. Hochevar
76. Blackburn
77.Porcello
78. Feldman
79. Saunders
80. Wheeler
81. GGonzalez
82. Garcia
83. Rzepczynski
84. Wakefield
85. Bulger
86. Holland
87. Hellickson
88. Tejada
89. Okajima
90. Westbrook
At the Sweet Sixteen - New Bracket Thoughts
Tuesday, March 23, 2010
Like many, my brackets are busted with Kansas getting bounced in Round 2 - but a good chunk of my smart bracket remains otherwise intact - regardless, here's how I'd call this weekend's games.
Midwest:
Northern Iowa over Michigan St.
Ohio St. over Tennessee
Ohio St. over Northern Iowa
Ohio State's the only team I had right, in both smart and fun brackets - I had them going to the Elite 8 and then losing to Kansas. With as much confidence as you can have given the nature of the tournament thusfar, I'll take the Buckeyes to come out of the weekend - Northern Iowa was good this year, every bit the team that Michigan St was - their making it to the Sweet Sixteen is only a shock because of who they took out - given the Spartans injury situation, I'll take them to go one more successful round and root for them to make the final four.
Ohio St's giving 4 1/2 and that's a stay away: Northern Iowa's getting one and a half, and since I like them outright I like the number - but just a tiny bit. None of the numbers this weekend is appetizing - like my thoughts when we got to the NFL playoffs, the lines are really too tight at this point in the season to present real opportunities.
West:
Syracuse over Butler
Kansas St over Xavier
Kansas St over Syracuse
The only team I have left in my fun bracket is Xavier (the other 3 teams, BYU, Florida St, UTEP) - but the smart bracket has 3 of the 4 (I had Pitt and not X) - I'll stay with my original smart guy bracket result and go 'Cuse, KSt - and then Kansas St. to come out. I'll root for Butler in the region.
Looking at the numbers, Butler's getting 6, which seems a little fat given the Syracuse injury. KSt is giving 5, which is a stay away.
East:
Kentucky over Cornell
West Virginia over Washington
Kentucky over West Virginia
I had Kentucky/West Virginia still here in both brackets (with Wisconsin in both, and Marquette/New Mexico as my 4th team). The fun bracket had Wisconsin beating WVU - the smart bracket WVU beating Kentucky - and now I'm hedging my bets; like the West, I'll stick with my orginal Elite 8 matchup with Kentucky/West Virginia - but I'll bend to the poor Big East performance and go Kentucky to come out. I'll be rooting Cornell and Washington.
Looking at the numbers, WVA is giving five, which looks like a tick heavy given how well the Huskies (Pac 10, baby!) are playing right now. Kentucky is giving 9 and that's a stay away game.
South:
Duke over Purdue
Baylor over St. Marys
Duke over Baylor
In both brackets I had Duke beating Baylor.
Now, here's where, despite what looks like a rough tournament run thusfar, I spin it in my direction.
If the Sweet Sixteen games turn out the way I expect - my smart bracket will have 7 of the 8 final teams left, only Kansas called incorrectly. The lesson being that even in a Cinderella heavy tournament - it's smart guy chalk that carries the day at the end.
St Marys is the team I'm most rooting for the rest of the way; I'm gonna root for Duke to beat Purdue.
Baylor's giving 4, and since the game's in Houston I'd be inclined to give them. Duke's giving 8 and I don't want any part of that game.
So - let's reset - my original fun guy final four:
Kansas
BYU
Wisconsin
Duke
My orginal smart guy final four
Kansas
Kansas St
West Virginia
Duke
And my current final four
Ohio St
Kansas St
Kentucky
Duke
We'll see how this works out.
I haven't written anything, so I'm largely making this up - but my plan is a Wrestlemania 26 preview for Wednesday; my 3 fantasy baseball drafts are over the weekend, I'll probably do something. My baseball picks will be mid next week.
Midwest:
Northern Iowa over Michigan St.
Ohio St. over Tennessee
Ohio St. over Northern Iowa
Ohio State's the only team I had right, in both smart and fun brackets - I had them going to the Elite 8 and then losing to Kansas. With as much confidence as you can have given the nature of the tournament thusfar, I'll take the Buckeyes to come out of the weekend - Northern Iowa was good this year, every bit the team that Michigan St was - their making it to the Sweet Sixteen is only a shock because of who they took out - given the Spartans injury situation, I'll take them to go one more successful round and root for them to make the final four.
Ohio St's giving 4 1/2 and that's a stay away: Northern Iowa's getting one and a half, and since I like them outright I like the number - but just a tiny bit. None of the numbers this weekend is appetizing - like my thoughts when we got to the NFL playoffs, the lines are really too tight at this point in the season to present real opportunities.
West:
Syracuse over Butler
Kansas St over Xavier
Kansas St over Syracuse
The only team I have left in my fun bracket is Xavier (the other 3 teams, BYU, Florida St, UTEP) - but the smart bracket has 3 of the 4 (I had Pitt and not X) - I'll stay with my original smart guy bracket result and go 'Cuse, KSt - and then Kansas St. to come out. I'll root for Butler in the region.
Looking at the numbers, Butler's getting 6, which seems a little fat given the Syracuse injury. KSt is giving 5, which is a stay away.
East:
Kentucky over Cornell
West Virginia over Washington
Kentucky over West Virginia
I had Kentucky/West Virginia still here in both brackets (with Wisconsin in both, and Marquette/New Mexico as my 4th team). The fun bracket had Wisconsin beating WVU - the smart bracket WVU beating Kentucky - and now I'm hedging my bets; like the West, I'll stick with my orginal Elite 8 matchup with Kentucky/West Virginia - but I'll bend to the poor Big East performance and go Kentucky to come out. I'll be rooting Cornell and Washington.
Looking at the numbers, WVA is giving five, which looks like a tick heavy given how well the Huskies (Pac 10, baby!) are playing right now. Kentucky is giving 9 and that's a stay away game.
South:
Duke over Purdue
Baylor over St. Marys
Duke over Baylor
In both brackets I had Duke beating Baylor.
Now, here's where, despite what looks like a rough tournament run thusfar, I spin it in my direction.
If the Sweet Sixteen games turn out the way I expect - my smart bracket will have 7 of the 8 final teams left, only Kansas called incorrectly. The lesson being that even in a Cinderella heavy tournament - it's smart guy chalk that carries the day at the end.
St Marys is the team I'm most rooting for the rest of the way; I'm gonna root for Duke to beat Purdue.
Baylor's giving 4, and since the game's in Houston I'd be inclined to give them. Duke's giving 8 and I don't want any part of that game.
So - let's reset - my original fun guy final four:
Kansas
BYU
Wisconsin
Duke
My orginal smart guy final four
Kansas
Kansas St
West Virginia
Duke
And my current final four
Ohio St
Kansas St
Kentucky
Duke
We'll see how this works out.
I haven't written anything, so I'm largely making this up - but my plan is a Wrestlemania 26 preview for Wednesday; my 3 fantasy baseball drafts are over the weekend, I'll probably do something. My baseball picks will be mid next week.
1st and Ten: The Weekly Tendown: March 14-20 2010
Sunday, March 21, 2010
Dear Internet:
I have a cold.
Your pal,
Jim
Okay - perhaps that's insufficient to satisfy my contractual obligation to provide you Issue 19 of The Tendown, your weekly look at the most important cultural happenings of the previous 7 days - but the fact is that I do have a cold, and that's going to mean a half assed job with this week's Tendown. Unlike Last Week, when I discussed the Handsome Men's Club, Simple Jack comparing the Census to slavery, and found my new favorite phrase - The Rapture Generation.
But this week, this week I'm busted. Busted, I tell you - busted like the very bestthing that happened over the past 7 days:
First: Cake v. Pie
After the first 7 games of the tournament Thursday, I got this text message alert from the NY Times:
NYT Men's NCAA Bracket:
Score: 52
Tourney Rank: 1
Sign up for groups @ ncaabracket.nytimes.com
That's first as in - my fun bracket was in first place in the NY Times pool halfway through the first day of the NCAA basketball tournament. First. First! In the New York Times! Everything's comin' up Milhouse!
Yeah, that's all gone now. I had Kansas winning, so, thanks, Kansas.
My brackets are officially thrown away. if I were more rugged, I could have used them as Kleenex. That aside, the tournament now - with St Marys and Northern Iowa as officially minted Cinderellas - is wide open and far more interesting than even my most medicinal prognostication would have anticipated.
But the busting of those brackets should not close our eyes to the limitless other bracket possibilites that the interwebs brought us this week - in fact, it's one of those Cake v. Pie which wins the crown as the best thing that happened over the past 7 days. Let's play the game!
I have a cold.
Your pal,
Jim
Okay - perhaps that's insufficient to satisfy my contractual obligation to provide you Issue 19 of The Tendown, your weekly look at the most important cultural happenings of the previous 7 days - but the fact is that I do have a cold, and that's going to mean a half assed job with this week's Tendown. Unlike Last Week, when I discussed the Handsome Men's Club, Simple Jack comparing the Census to slavery, and found my new favorite phrase - The Rapture Generation.
But this week, this week I'm busted. Busted, I tell you - busted like the very bestthing that happened over the past 7 days:
First: Cake v. Pie
After the first 7 games of the tournament Thursday, I got this text message alert from the NY Times:
NYT Men's NCAA Bracket:
Score: 52
Tourney Rank: 1
Sign up for groups @ ncaabracket.nytimes.com
That's first as in - my fun bracket was in first place in the NY Times pool halfway through the first day of the NCAA basketball tournament. First. First! In the New York Times! Everything's comin' up Milhouse!
Yeah, that's all gone now. I had Kansas winning, so, thanks, Kansas.
My brackets are officially thrown away. if I were more rugged, I could have used them as Kleenex. That aside, the tournament now - with St Marys and Northern Iowa as officially minted Cinderellas - is wide open and far more interesting than even my most medicinal prognostication would have anticipated.
But the busting of those brackets should not close our eyes to the limitless other bracket possibilites that the interwebs brought us this week - in fact, it's one of those Cake v. Pie which wins the crown as the best thing that happened over the past 7 days. Let's play the game!
Birthday faces a nice contrast in styles in the 2nd round against Pound; that's like a Kentucky/Cornell game; Birthday is loaded with flashy highly recruited marquee athletes but Pound is small and white and fundamentally sound. So compact and scrappy is Pound - gritty and gutty - with veteran ingredients who just want it so badly! Birthday goes over, pulling away late after a nip and tuck first half. I'm going to take Carrot as the Cinderella coming out of its region, knocking off ICC in the second and doing it with surprising ease - then riding that wave in taking out Wedding, which benefited by a few terrible officials calls in defeating Red Velvet.
In the pie bracket - Apple and Pumpkin make their way cleanly to their Elite 8 Match; silky smooth like a George Gervin finger roll, Pumpkin just can't miss from the field in that one, shooting 67% from the floor to earn a Final Four spot - but there - there it has to face an underseeded Juggernaut - Cheesecake - sort of like a Hakeem Olajuwon with dual citizenship - the taxonomic classification of cheesecake as not cake but custard pie creates one of the great second round matchups in tournament history - Cheesecake v. Cherry - Cheesecake v. Cherry, to use the language of wrestling, could be a main event in any promotion in the world - it's like if we got Phi Slamma Jamma against Hoya Paranoia in the second round of the '84 tourney - a half dozen blocked shots, a near brawl, Sleepy Floyd going coast-to-coast! Cherry is up by eleven at the half, but a canny substitution by Cheesecake...
...putting in Cherry Cheesecake....
Leads to a torrent of thunderdunks - including the shattering of a backboard (Send It In Jerome!) that rains delicious graham cracker crust along press row.
That leaves us a Final Four for the Ages:
1. Birthday v. 7. Carrot
2. Cheesecake v. 4. Pumpkin
Birthday's an overwhelming favorite, giving a dozen points at the closing line - but Carrot has two tide turning factors leading to one of the great semi-final upsets in sports history, included in the same conversation with the US beating the USSR in the '80 Olympic hockey semi-finals (Do you believe in Cream Cheese Frosting? Yes!) the first is that in 2009, my birthday cake was a carrot cake - and that type of versatility (Look, Carrot can run up and down the floor with Birthday! - Carrot can play Birthday's style!) caught the overconfident Birthday flat-footed. The second - and the factor that really wins the game down the stretch - is you have to share Birthday cake. Most birthday cakes are consumed after someone has spit all over them after blowing out candles - then you have to hustle for a piece - and while there are presents - really it's commemoration of being a year closer to death. If you think about it; celebrating birthdays is macabre; hey, let's gather around and sing:
Happy Birthday to you
Your Life Will End Soon,
Everyone in the Graveyard,
Had a Birthday Party Too
Who needs that pressure? I can huddle alone, in the dark, with my huge slab of carrot cake and watch my Will&Grace reruns and not bother anyone.
Carrot wins - they go the final - where they meet Cheesecake, which solidly handled Pumpkin - can Carrot - which took out heavily favored Wedding and Birthday keep the glass slipper on against the monstrous Cheesecake?
Yeah, no. Cheesecake dominates from the opening tip - it's a coronation.
Your winner in the great Cake v. Pie Tournament - Cheesecake.
After the jump - the rest of the Tendown
Brackets
Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Welcome to my process.
Essentially, I've got two brackets - a smart bracket where I pick some targeted upsets early and then mainly chalk late - and then one where I go for it. The above is the latter. Prior to tip, I'll have clean, large copies of both on the glass table in my living room; for at least the last two decades, I've gone out the morning after selection Sunday and purchased two USA Todays; even now, when all of my research is done online and it may well be the only day of the year I physically buy an issue - I still look forward to taking my scissors to cut out my giant brackets. I'll be working during Thursday's early games, but save for the times when I'm with my lady type friend, you'll be able to find me on my couch, drinking canned diet lemonade (another Jividen tourney tradition) for much of the balance of the tournament.
If you're like me (I'm sorry) you get increasing pleasure out of feeling like yourself; part of its age, part life circumstance, but the experience of being me is increasingly foreign, I'm more estranged from myself today than I can ever recall being. So when I have a "hey, this is how it feels to be me" sensation - like seeing my giant brackets on my glass table, feeling the bitterness of the diet lemonade in my throat - it's comforting. I feel that same comfort on NFL draft weekend (we'll see what happens watching on DVR since I'll have work) and Wrestlemania; all coming right in a cluster over the next few weeks (not to mention Oscars last week and the fantasy baseball drafts, and then Opening Day - it's always a crazy flurry of paperwork at Camp Me) I always look at this time of the year as a bit of a mental homecoming. And I need it in a hard way.
Onto the brackets.
Let's start with the Midwest, it's the bracket in which I have the most confidence; all the way through, the only difference between my fun bracket (again, that's pictured above) and my more scientific bracket is Tennessee/San Diego St in Round One; that's what I think of as a good upset pick for a pool - because the upsets you want to avoid are the ones that cost you multiple rounds - if you take San Diego and they lose - you're only losing in that round, as neither team is getting past Georgetown over the weekend. Everything else is exactly the same, all the way to Kansas going to the final four.
The West is icky. My smart guy bracket, like my fun bracket has Syracuse and Florida St up top - and BYU/Kansas St on the bottom. But the middle of the bracket...the smart guy bracket has Butler and Vandy coming out of Round one; whereas the fun guy bracket has UTEP and Murray St - they both look like super close games to me, way closer than the seeds would indicate; and in a close round one game - why not root for the dogs? The problem is someone's gotta go to the Sweet 16; my fun guy bracket says UTEP - my smart guy bracket has Butler. Either will lose in the next round - as you can see, my fun guy bracket says they'll be losing to Florida St., who I have beating Syracuse in one of my more fun upset picks. And then rounding out the fun - take a look at who I have Florida St losing to in the Elite 8 - it's BYU, who I have beating Xavier in the Sweet 16 after X takes out Pitt. The smart guy bracket has Syracuse and Kansas St in that Elite 8 game (Kansas St to win) and I put K St over Pitt, Pitt over Xavier. I really like BYU, I really don't like Pitt - and that Florida St/Syracuse game is exactly the kind of matchup begging to go for the underdog.
On the other side - Kentucky, Texas, Temple, Wisconsin, New Mexico, Clemson, West Virginia is the same in the first round of both brackets. Washington's in the fun bracket - Marquette in the bidness bracket. And then that leads to the only difference in the next round - New Mexico in the bracket above - Marquette in the smart bracket. The smart bracket's got Kentucky and West Virginia - but I do love me some Wisconsin, they're my East bracket version of BYU - and here's where I contradict the scan I'M CONTRADICTING THE SCAN! - I've got Wisconsin going to the final four (and not West Virginia, even though the bracket indicates otherwise) on the fun bracket - and - West Virginia on the business bracket. No Kentucky! No Kentucky!
Down South - the only first round differences are Texas A&M and ODU in the smart bracket, Utah St and Notre Dame in the fun bracket (I recognize I need to switch ODU and Notre Dame, I will) It's A&M in the sweet sixteen in the smart bracket - Utah St, as you can see, in the fun bracket. Everything else is the same - Duke beating Baylor in the elite 8, Baylor having knocked out Nova.
In every version of every bracket, I've got Kansas beating Duke in the title game.
I'm in a handful of pools - my most common final four includes Wisconsin and BYU. I also like Utah St. And if Florida St beats Syracuse I'll get my dance on. My typical entry looks more fun than smart. 'Cause it's March, and when I'm feeling the most like myself - I pick fun over smart.
That part's totally untrue, no one would ever, at any point in my life, have called me more fun than smart, but I was so hoping to be able to carry that all the way through.
Enjoy the hoops.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


