Drew Brees. Not Alfonso Ribeiro. He just missed.
Runners-up: Jahvid Best, Floyd Mayweather, Jimmie Johnson
9 down. 3 left. The last athlete of the year for this decade is still up for grabs.
Your Athlete of the Month - September 2009
Monday, September 28, 2009
Drew Brees. Not Alfonso Ribeiro. He just missed.
Runners-up: Jahvid Best, Floyd Mayweather, Jimmie Johnson
9 down. 3 left. The last athlete of the year for this decade is still up for grabs.
The Body Count
Saturday, September 26, 2009
Part of that lunacy focused on the Census (as if it were somehow a new occurrence) which became the mechanism by which Obama would create his concentration camps. Michele Bachmann said the Census Bureau would get information about you from your neighbors if you refused to talk to them, saying "there is a point where you say enough is enough to government intrusion." Bachmann said the level of government intrusion in our lives is making us "slaves" - said that we are reaching a point of "orderly revolution." Neal Boortz referred to Census takers as "looters" saying that the Census gathers information "designed to help the government steal from you."
The Census is government intrusion that might justify rebellion. But Bachmann voted for warrantless domestic wiretapping. This mirrors conservative outcry against ACORN and simultaneous continued support of Blackwater. Conservative hypocrisy isn't hidden in plain sight; it screams out in bursts of neon.
And in Kentucky, a Census worker was found naked, bound, gagged, hanged, with the word Fed written on his chest and his Census ID taped to his head.
Nothing will change. Not a syllable. In fact, as Bill O' Reilly did when his regular drumbeating reference to "Tiller the Baby Killer" was examined following the homicide of abortion provider George Tiller, the response will be that it's a fascist/socialist/Nazi attempt to silence the oppressed "real Americans". The response will be, as Oklahoma Senator Coburn said when confronted on Meet the Press with the out of control anti-government rhetoric "we've earned it."
In July of 2008 it was the shootings in the Tennessee church, the murderer leaving behind a four page letter explaining how the church was too liberal in its teachings, that all liberals should be killed because they were ruining the country, that they had ruined every institution in America:
"If decent patriotic Americans could vote three times in every election we couldn’t stem this tide of liberalism that’s destroying America. Liberals are a pest like termites. Millions of them. Each little bite contributes to the downfall of this great Nation. The only way we can rid ourselves of this evil is Kill them in the streets. Kill them where they gather"
Among the literature in his home, Michael Savage's Liberalism is a Mental Health Disorder. From another Savage book, Savage Nation, came this:
"To fight only the al-Qaeda scum is to miss the terrorist network operating within our own borders… Who are these traitors? Every rotten radical left-winger in this country, that’s who.”
Savage isn't alone in this level of violent talk.
Here's Sean Hannity:
I’ll tell you who should be tortured and killed at Guantanamo: every filthy Democrat in the U.S. Congress.
Here's Rush Limbaugh:
Liberalism is the greatest threat this country faces.
I tell people don't kill all the liberals. Leave enough so we can have two on every campus -- living fossils -- so we will never forget what these people stood for.
Here's Ann Coulter:
We need to execute people like John Walker in order to physically intimidate liberals, by making them realize that they can be killed, too.
And here's Simple Jack:
I'm thinking about killing Michael Moore, and I'm wondering if I could kill him myself, or if I would need to hire somebody to do it. No, I think I could.
Where are the similar quotes from the stars of the left? These aren't random blog comments; these are highly compensated superstars of the right, highly advertised and supported through corporate dollars and outlets. A 10 million dollar sexual harrassment lawsuit payoff here and a drug conviction there notwithstanding.
See, 'cause that's how this gets framed - that somehow "both sides" say extreme things, "both sides" have radical perspectives, that the hatred of Bush was expressed in ways similar to the hatred of Obama.
Where does Michael Moore threaten to kill Republicans? There are lots of movies, plenty of interviews - where are the death threats? Keith Olbermann did lots of passionate anti-Bush commentary, where's the clip where he said he should be assassinated? Ann Coulter said "My only regret with Timothy McVeigh is he did not go to the New York Times Building." in which of his books did Al Franken express a wish that Fox News would be blown up, its employees killed in the explosion?
There's a term for this sort of rhetoric - Eliminationism, where a democratic exhange of ideas is replaced by violent rhetoric designed to close the discussion of those ideas. Where an "enemy within" is framed as evil, as needing to be eliminated. Perhaps you recognize this in the tactics from the town hall debates - designed not to foster discussion - but to end it. Guns brought as shows of force, of intimidation - implicitly saying shut this debate down, my guns are more important than your ballot box.
Conversation is needed in democracy; one should feel able to freely exchange ideas - once those ideas are threats that speech is no longer geared toward flourishing ideas but ending them. Conservatives take cover under the first amendment while their words are geared toward ending discussion.
When Simple Jack talks about a return to how we felt the day after 9-11, I think I know what he means.
We didn't have political debates in the United States after 9-11. Not any that were allowable. Our national reaction - that the US was an innocent actor, hated for its freedoms, and that we needed to sacrifice some of those freedoms and adopt a militaristic response, both foreign and domestic, to defeat a nebulous enemy at any cost - was not one from which many could deviate in public life. Big government, much more intrusive than the Census, in the form of the Patriot Act and suspicionless, warantless domestic telecommunications surveillance, was put in place with virtually no debate. Big government, much more intrusive than a public health care option, in the form of the jailing and interrogation of terrorist suspects, held without charge, held without lawyers, tortured in violation of US law was put in place with virtually no debate. Big government, in the form of two endless foreign wars, wars which have added far, far, far more to the US debt than any Obama stimulus package, commenced with virtually no debate. I was teaching US Government at the time, questioning the federal government was characterized as treason by the very same people who, in the wake of Obama's victory, say that if the federal government were to provide health insurance it would be the equivalent of Nazi Germany.
We got another dead body in Kentucky. That's where we are in America in 2009.
(Meanwhile, as correctly noted in Newsweek, the Big government right wing US Supreme Court continues to incrementally roll back a century of individual liberties. And the silence is deafening.)
The Weekly Ten - Week 4 College Football Picks
Thursday, September 24, 2009
Overall: 21-9
Locks: 3-0
Missouri -7 Nevada (win)
Vandy -7 Rice (win)
Wyoming +3.5 UNLV (win)
Florida -21.5 Kentucky (win)
N Illinois -17 Idaho (loss)
BYU -17 Col St. (win)
Notre Dame v. Purdue (under 60) (win)
Cal v. Oregon (under 58) (win)
UL-Monroe +3.5 FAU (win)
Lock: Ohio St -14 Illinois (win)
Week: 9-1.
Overall: 30-10. Locks: 4-0.
Consider following me around the countryside.
Locks: 3-0
Missouri -7 Nevada (win)
Vandy -7 Rice (win)
Wyoming +3.5 UNLV (win)
Florida -21.5 Kentucky (win)
N Illinois -17 Idaho (loss)
BYU -17 Col St. (win)
Notre Dame v. Purdue (under 60) (win)
Cal v. Oregon (under 58) (win)
UL-Monroe +3.5 FAU (win)
Lock: Ohio St -14 Illinois (win)
Week: 9-1.
Overall: 30-10. Locks: 4-0.
Consider following me around the countryside.
Fear of a Black Planet
Wednesday, September 23, 2009
One of my favorite episodes of Frontline ever was a piece on the 10 year anniversary of the OJ Simpson verdict; it was smarter about the actual trial than the culture has allowed us to be and contextualized it in the context of race relations. Near the end, there was a segment in a South Central Los Angeles barbershop (the general consensus of the patrons, that the LAPD "framed a guilty man" was earlier offered in the documentary by a criminal procedure class at Georgetown Law) which ended with two of the African-American men doing a run about Simpson finding out he wasn't really accepted in the white community just like Michael Jackson found out he wasn't really accepted in the white community because at the end of the day, "white people call rich black people niggers."
In one of my previous health care pieces I got the jump on Jimmy Carter in suggesting the hyperbolic reaction to Obama bears a relationship to his race. That doesn't mean that if you oppose Obama you're a racist - it doesn't even mean that Joe Wilson, Congressman from South Carolina who had previously opposed the removal of the Confederate flag from the state's capitol, had Obama's race consciously in his mind when he shouted out "you lie" during his address to Congress. We've seen the same combination of dumbness, demogoguery, and corporate dollars in action mobilize in opposition to health care reform before.
What Obama's race does do is makes it easier for his opponents to get to that fevered level, makes it easier to cross that bridge to move him from "politician whose policies I disagree with" to "terrorist, Nazi, death panels, Muslim, Kenya, Manchurian Candidate, socialist, Arab."
There is a level of opposition to this health care bill that genuinely believes Obama is looking to destroy the United States - that his secret goal is to kill Americans. They have filled talk radio with it, sent countless forwarded emails across cyberspace with it, that language existed at McCain-Palin campaign rallies, at the tea parties, the town hall meetings, the 9-12 March on Washington. And some of it is clearly stoked - stoked by Simple Jack saying Obama has a "deep seated hatred for white people" or Rush Limbaugh saying "in Obama's America" black kids cheer as white kids get beaten up on a school bus (and the solution to that should be "segregation"), or by the National Republican Senatorial Committee who issued a poll which included the following question:
Rationing and Restricting Health Care - Are you concerned that health care rationing could lead to:
A "quota" system which would determine who would get treatment on the basis of race or age.
A few weeks ago, I wrote about another poll, a RNC poll that asked if people were concerned that political party affiliation might be a basis for determining who received treatment under a government run health care plan. There is a feeder relationship in play here, Fox News and right wing talk have positioned themselves as the "real news" - where you won't get lied to by liberal facts like global warming or evolution. Exponentially, the number of Americans who can live hermetically sealed in propaganda bubbles, uncluttered with thoughts other than those spewed at them by those married to the Christian and/or plutocratic right, has increased. When you add the official imprint of the Republican Party, whether it's Sarah Palin connecting Obama to terrorists, calling his health care plan "evil", or Texas governor Perry using the word "secession", or that poll question - using the racially loaded word "quota" in the context of Obama's health care plan to imply that white people would lose access to doctors - it is just enough gas to set those predisposed to those sorts of thoughts aflame with anger.
You don't need to be racist to oppose Obama, but there haven't been guns at town hall meetings of the President before, there haven't been school district boycotts of Presidential speeches before, there haven't been Congressmen shouting out "you lie" at the President before, phrases like "terrorist fist jab" and "pals around with terrorists" weren't used to attack a President before.
White Presidents, as Bill Clinton has pointed out, get attacked and attacked hard. But less in a way which has as its premise the idea that they aren't really the President. That they shouldn't be treated as the President. There are lots of ways, to wrap this health care debate back to the first Obama speech, to think about what happened to Harvard Professor Henry Louis Gates, but there aren't white Harvard professors arrested under similar circumstances. If we see a South Carolina congressman shout something at first African-American President that hasn't been shouted by a Congressman at a white President - or a Boston cop arrest a black Harvard professor for something a white Harvard professor has never been arrested for - it doesn't stretch the boundaries of fair play to fit that in a racial frame.
Last week, a Republican congressman from Missouri used an anecdote about monkeys stealing golf balls to explain the condition in which conservatives find themselves in today's Washington. Simple Jack and Rush Limbaugh have used the word "reparations" to explain Obama's motivating purpose behind social policy. Limbaugh called Obama "an angry black guy".
When some of his opponents see Obama, they don't see the President of the United States - they see "just another n***** in America."
I Pick Every NFL Game - Week 3
Overall: 15-17
If you're new (1) no, you should never play every NFL game, this is just for completeness purposes (2) I'm not disappointed by the early showing (3) I'm going to have a winning week this week. (4) I did not.
Titans +3 Jets (loss)
Ravens -13 Cleveland (win)
Tampa +6.5 NYG (loss)
Jags +3.5 Texans (win)
Vikes -7 Niners (loss)
Pats -4 Falcons (win)
Skins -6.5 Lions (loss)
GB -6.5 Rams (win)
Seattle +2.5 Chic (loss)
Buff +6 NO (loss)
Eagles -9.5 KC (win)
Bengals +4 Steelers (win)
Raiders +1.5 Denver (loss)
Dolphins +6 Chargers (loss)
Colts +2 Cards (win)
Panthers +9 Cowboys (loss)
7-9
Overall: 22-26
Maybe just listen to me picking the college games.
If you're new (1) no, you should never play every NFL game, this is just for completeness purposes (2) I'm not disappointed by the early showing (3) I'm going to have a winning week this week. (4) I did not.
Titans +3 Jets (loss)
Ravens -13 Cleveland (win)
Tampa +6.5 NYG (loss)
Jags +3.5 Texans (win)
Vikes -7 Niners (loss)
Pats -4 Falcons (win)
Skins -6.5 Lions (loss)
GB -6.5 Rams (win)
Seattle +2.5 Chic (loss)
Buff +6 NO (loss)
Eagles -9.5 KC (win)
Bengals +4 Steelers (win)
Raiders +1.5 Denver (loss)
Dolphins +6 Chargers (loss)
Colts +2 Cards (win)
Panthers +9 Cowboys (loss)
7-9
Overall: 22-26
Maybe just listen to me picking the college games.
2009 Emmy Predictions
Saturday, September 19, 2009
Not only do I predict college football games (15-5 going into today's games) I also predict tomorrow's Emmy Awards. Fun to do!
Best Drama:
Will Win: Mad Men (-125)
Should Win: Breaking Bad
Mad Men's a good investment at that number; the nominations margin throughout the categories it has over the other contenders bodes well historically. I'd lean, by the narrowest of margins, Breaking Bad by my preference last season. If there's an upset, that's what will win. Big Love is also terrific, it won't win as this is its only nom, but it gives me a chance to offer that Ginnifer Goodwin is really, really good to watch on the tv set.
The Shield and Friday Night Lights would have rounded out this category nicely, and I'd have voted for the cop show.
Best Comedy:
Will Win: 30 Rock (-250)
Should Win: 30 Rock
30 Rock's a cut above every other comedy; it's got nominations advantages and has leapt past The Office as the official smart show that the tv intelligensia has embraced. Maybe the Office wins; Family Guy has had a noteworthy internet campaign to build some buzz - but it would be the biggest surprise of the night if 30 Rock didn't repeat. Even at -250 it's a good play. Of the other noms, I like HIMYM, it should have been paired with a Big Bang nom and they might have a couple year run as the dopplegangers for the NBC shows. United States of Tara could have gotten a nom - Party Down was a sneaky funny show on Starz that no one watched but I would have liked to see nominated.
Best Actor - Drama
Will Win: Bryan Cranston (+175)
Should Win: Bryan Cranston
Cranston's got a much flashier role than does Jon Hamm and that might be enough to get him across the line again, but at only +175 I'd stay away from that play. Hamm's +250 and maybe you take that plunge. Admittedly, I don't watch House (I don't watch doctor shows, all I think about is death) but I know that Hugh Laurie gets to do some scene chewing and the +400 number for him is friendly. In Treatment is a DVD show for me, so I've yet to see season two, but Gabriel Byrne was tremendous is season one, so his win wouldn't make me sad. I don't know how Michael Chiklis and Kyle Chandler aren't nominated.
Best Actress - Drama
Will Win: Glenn Close (+125)
Should Win: Elisabeth Moss
-It's hard time for some turnover in this category, we get into the soaps and the procedurals with the actress nominees; there's just a decided drop in show quality from actor to actress nominees. Close is +125 and she seems like a lock - but Moss at +500...there's a possibility Mad Men just runs over everyone, that it wins writing and directing and show, and Hamm - the chance that carries to Moss (who also is the best in the category - yay for Bookbag!) is absolutely worth the +500 investment. Connie Britton would have gotten my vote had she been nominated.
Best Actor - Comedy
Will Win: Steve Carrell
Should Win: Steve Carrell
There's an interesting investment to be made here. Alec Baldwin's the favorite, at -125, and if there's a gun to your head, you expect him to win. But word around the watercooler is his submission wasn't as strong as last year and that might open the door for the other two possibilities. Carrell (+250) has never won; and to be as big a star as he is, to have the level of acclaim that he gets, and to not have won means there might be room to slip him in this year. And the guy with the late buzz is Jim Parsons (+350), Big Bang Theory is starting to generate some traction, and this might be a moment for a real Emmy shocker. Consider the following - at those odds, an investment in both Parsons and Carrell leaves you in the black if either of them wins. This makes some sense to me.
Best Actress - Comedy
Will Win: Tina Fey (-300)
Should Win: Toni Collette
Fey's the biggest favorite on the board at -300, and she probably wins - but Toni Collette was crazy good in a show that was also pretty good around her, and she had a flashy, actor-y role such that it shouldn't surprise anyone if she were to take it. At +250 she's a nice play.
The other contest to play is best Reality-Competition where Dancing with the Stars is favored, interestingly over Amazing Race (+175). If you're unaware - Amazing Race has never lost this award, and getting an unbeaten underdog is a pretty rare occurrence.
And the rest - just picks, not making a qualitative assessment:
Reality Host - Phil Keoghan
Miniseries - Generation Kill
Made for TV Movie - Grey Gardens
Actor - Movie - Ian Mckellan
Actress - Movie - Sigourney Weaver
Variety - Saturday Night Live
Supporting Actor Comedy - Neil Patrick Harris
Supporting Actress Comedy - Amy Poehler
Best Drama:
Will Win: Mad Men (-125)
Should Win: Breaking Bad
Mad Men's a good investment at that number; the nominations margin throughout the categories it has over the other contenders bodes well historically. I'd lean, by the narrowest of margins, Breaking Bad by my preference last season. If there's an upset, that's what will win. Big Love is also terrific, it won't win as this is its only nom, but it gives me a chance to offer that Ginnifer Goodwin is really, really good to watch on the tv set.
The Shield and Friday Night Lights would have rounded out this category nicely, and I'd have voted for the cop show.
Best Comedy:
Will Win: 30 Rock (-250)
Should Win: 30 Rock
30 Rock's a cut above every other comedy; it's got nominations advantages and has leapt past The Office as the official smart show that the tv intelligensia has embraced. Maybe the Office wins; Family Guy has had a noteworthy internet campaign to build some buzz - but it would be the biggest surprise of the night if 30 Rock didn't repeat. Even at -250 it's a good play. Of the other noms, I like HIMYM, it should have been paired with a Big Bang nom and they might have a couple year run as the dopplegangers for the NBC shows. United States of Tara could have gotten a nom - Party Down was a sneaky funny show on Starz that no one watched but I would have liked to see nominated.
Best Actor - Drama
Will Win: Bryan Cranston (+175)
Should Win: Bryan Cranston
Cranston's got a much flashier role than does Jon Hamm and that might be enough to get him across the line again, but at only +175 I'd stay away from that play. Hamm's +250 and maybe you take that plunge. Admittedly, I don't watch House (I don't watch doctor shows, all I think about is death) but I know that Hugh Laurie gets to do some scene chewing and the +400 number for him is friendly. In Treatment is a DVD show for me, so I've yet to see season two, but Gabriel Byrne was tremendous is season one, so his win wouldn't make me sad. I don't know how Michael Chiklis and Kyle Chandler aren't nominated.
Best Actress - Drama
Will Win: Glenn Close (+125)
Should Win: Elisabeth Moss
-It's hard time for some turnover in this category, we get into the soaps and the procedurals with the actress nominees; there's just a decided drop in show quality from actor to actress nominees. Close is +125 and she seems like a lock - but Moss at +500...there's a possibility Mad Men just runs over everyone, that it wins writing and directing and show, and Hamm - the chance that carries to Moss (who also is the best in the category - yay for Bookbag!) is absolutely worth the +500 investment. Connie Britton would have gotten my vote had she been nominated.
Best Actor - Comedy
Will Win: Steve Carrell
Should Win: Steve Carrell
There's an interesting investment to be made here. Alec Baldwin's the favorite, at -125, and if there's a gun to your head, you expect him to win. But word around the watercooler is his submission wasn't as strong as last year and that might open the door for the other two possibilities. Carrell (+250) has never won; and to be as big a star as he is, to have the level of acclaim that he gets, and to not have won means there might be room to slip him in this year. And the guy with the late buzz is Jim Parsons (+350), Big Bang Theory is starting to generate some traction, and this might be a moment for a real Emmy shocker. Consider the following - at those odds, an investment in both Parsons and Carrell leaves you in the black if either of them wins. This makes some sense to me.
Best Actress - Comedy
Will Win: Tina Fey (-300)
Should Win: Toni Collette
Fey's the biggest favorite on the board at -300, and she probably wins - but Toni Collette was crazy good in a show that was also pretty good around her, and she had a flashy, actor-y role such that it shouldn't surprise anyone if she were to take it. At +250 she's a nice play.
The other contest to play is best Reality-Competition where Dancing with the Stars is favored, interestingly over Amazing Race (+175). If you're unaware - Amazing Race has never lost this award, and getting an unbeaten underdog is a pretty rare occurrence.
And the rest - just picks, not making a qualitative assessment:
Reality Host - Phil Keoghan
Miniseries - Generation Kill
Made for TV Movie - Grey Gardens
Actor - Movie - Ian Mckellan
Actress - Movie - Sigourney Weaver
Variety - Saturday Night Live
Supporting Actor Comedy - Neil Patrick Harris
Supporting Actress Comedy - Amy Poehler
The Weekly Ten - Ten College Football Picks. Week 3
Thursday, September 17, 2009
Overall: 15-5
Locks: 2-0
You're welcome. Last week's 9-1 is a fluke. If you've stumbled upon it last week and think I have the second sight, you're in error. Just one of those things.
Northwestern -3 Syracuse (loss)
Vandy -9 Miss St. (loss)
Wyoming +7 Colorado (loss)
Kansas -23 Duke (win)
UCF -4.5 Buffalo (win)
UConn +10.5 Baylor (win)
Virginia Tech -5 Nebraska (loss)
Hawaii +7 UNLV (win)
South Carolina -20.5 FAU (win)
Lock: Louisville +14 Kentucky (win)
6-4. Overall: 21-9. Locks: 3-0. You're welcome. Call my hotline.
Locks: 2-0
You're welcome. Last week's 9-1 is a fluke. If you've stumbled upon it last week and think I have the second sight, you're in error. Just one of those things.
Northwestern -3 Syracuse (loss)
Vandy -9 Miss St. (loss)
Wyoming +7 Colorado (loss)
Kansas -23 Duke (win)
UCF -4.5 Buffalo (win)
UConn +10.5 Baylor (win)
Virginia Tech -5 Nebraska (loss)
Hawaii +7 UNLV (win)
South Carolina -20.5 FAU (win)
Lock: Louisville +14 Kentucky (win)
6-4. Overall: 21-9. Locks: 3-0. You're welcome. Call my hotline.
I Pick Every NFL Game - Week 2
8-8 last week. Picking every game all season. See how this goes.
Oakland +3 KC (win)
Tennessee -6.5 Houston (loss)
NE -3.5 NYJ (loss)
Cincinnati +9 GB (win)
Minnesota -10 Detroit (win)
Philly 0 NO (loss)
Carolina +6 Atlanta (loss)
StL +9.5 Washington (win)
Jax -3 Arizona (loss)
Seattle +1.5 Niners (loss)
TB +5 Buffalo (loss)
Cleve +3 Den (loss)
SD -3 Balt (loss)
Chi +3 Pitt (win)
NYG +3 Dall (win)
Indy -3 Miami (win)
Week: 7-9
Overall: 15-17
Oakland +3 KC (win)
Tennessee -6.5 Houston (loss)
NE -3.5 NYJ (loss)
Cincinnati +9 GB (win)
Minnesota -10 Detroit (win)
Philly 0 NO (loss)
Carolina +6 Atlanta (loss)
StL +9.5 Washington (win)
Jax -3 Arizona (loss)
Seattle +1.5 Niners (loss)
TB +5 Buffalo (loss)
Cleve +3 Den (loss)
SD -3 Balt (loss)
Chi +3 Pitt (win)
NYG +3 Dall (win)
Indy -3 Miami (win)
Week: 7-9
Overall: 15-17
Or Maybe They're Just Idiots.
Wednesday, September 16, 2009
Last night, I talked about the lunatic right wing fringe as held captive by the same plutocratic hegemony that has all of us in its grip. Sure, they call Obama a Nazi instead of turning their rage on Goldman Sachs, but we are united in our fury toward the establishment.
I may be on the opposite side of the political spectrum from someone who says that government should keep its hands off Social Security, but I don't hate the vibe.
In fact, I feel about Joe Wilson the same way I feel about Mark Sanford. Except for the part where these guys legislate one way and then live another, I couldn't possibly care less about who an elected official sleeps with. I'd love to extend a metphorical hand across the aisle in a post-partisan way to say "okay, everyone sleeps with whomever they want - it's no longer a thing. Break." If Joe Wilson calling the President a liar during a speech to Congress means that now that type of thing is in play, I'm down. I'd much, much, much prefer a political culture where the President (and all elected officials) were less untouchable glass figurines and more civil servants, just well compensated, highly publicized DMV clerks. If we can give them the whatfor now - that's terrific - and I'll expect similar rabble rousing from a lefty Congressman the next time it's appropriate. This is a good result.
I'm still not down with taking the guns to speeches though.
So, I'm feeling good about the crazies. Maybe I'm adopting that 9-12 sensibility that Simple Jack talks about (which part of 9-12 was devoted to hating the victims' families - that's something Simple Jack has subsequently said he does).
It's a brand new day! I may go to a John Birch Society cross burning, er, meeting, later on.
But then I read this.
It's worse than that.
That's a New Jersey poll. Those numbers are all voters. So, a fifth of the voters in Jersey aren't sure if Obama's the Anti-Christ.
When you ask Republicans, it's 1/3.
And when you ask Hispanics, it's almost half. Almost half of the Hispanics in New Jersey think the President of the United States may be the anti-Christ.
That means that almost half of the Hispanics in New Jersey actually believe the anti-Christ may exist, which is troubling enough.
18,000 real Americans die every year because of a lack of health insurance.
That's a 9/11 every two months.
But we're worried about ghost stories and fairy tales.
The Devil's imaginary. He won't get you any faster than the Easter Bunny will bring you a chocolate egg.
What's gonna get you is not having health care.
(edit - on the other hand, which makes three hands, I believe, and creates an even more pressing need for health care, I thought Edgar Renteria was going to come through for me last night. He did not. They break my heart every year. Where's the public option on my baseball team never having won a World Series?)
I may be on the opposite side of the political spectrum from someone who says that government should keep its hands off Social Security, but I don't hate the vibe.
In fact, I feel about Joe Wilson the same way I feel about Mark Sanford. Except for the part where these guys legislate one way and then live another, I couldn't possibly care less about who an elected official sleeps with. I'd love to extend a metphorical hand across the aisle in a post-partisan way to say "okay, everyone sleeps with whomever they want - it's no longer a thing. Break." If Joe Wilson calling the President a liar during a speech to Congress means that now that type of thing is in play, I'm down. I'd much, much, much prefer a political culture where the President (and all elected officials) were less untouchable glass figurines and more civil servants, just well compensated, highly publicized DMV clerks. If we can give them the whatfor now - that's terrific - and I'll expect similar rabble rousing from a lefty Congressman the next time it's appropriate. This is a good result.
I'm still not down with taking the guns to speeches though.
So, I'm feeling good about the crazies. Maybe I'm adopting that 9-12 sensibility that Simple Jack talks about (which part of 9-12 was devoted to hating the victims' families - that's something Simple Jack has subsequently said he does).
It's a brand new day! I may go to a John Birch Society cross burning, er, meeting, later on.
But then I read this.
That's a New Jersey poll. Those numbers are all voters. So, a fifth of the voters in Jersey aren't sure if Obama's the Anti-Christ.
When you ask Republicans, it's 1/3.
And when you ask Hispanics, it's almost half. Almost half of the Hispanics in New Jersey think the President of the United States may be the anti-Christ.
That means that almost half of the Hispanics in New Jersey actually believe the anti-Christ may exist, which is troubling enough.
18,000 real Americans die every year because of a lack of health insurance.
That's a 9/11 every two months.
But we're worried about ghost stories and fairy tales.
The Devil's imaginary. He won't get you any faster than the Easter Bunny will bring you a chocolate egg.
What's gonna get you is not having health care.
(edit - on the other hand, which makes three hands, I believe, and creates an even more pressing need for health care, I thought Edgar Renteria was going to come through for me last night. He did not. They break my heart every year. Where's the public option on my baseball team never having won a World Series?)
Stockholm Syndrome
One of the 18,000 Americans who will die this year because of a lack of health insurance, the only industrialized country in the world where this happens, is the real life Norma Rae.
There's reason to be angry about things that happen in the United States. Reason to march on Washington, reason to call the President of the United States a liar; reason for rage.
Like the 19 million in fines the five largest California insurance companies have had to pay out in the past 18 months.
Or that domestic violence is a pre-existing condition.
And that executives of bailed out companies are taking home millions.:
"From 2006 through 2008, the top five executives at the 20 banks that have accepted the most federal bailout dollars since the meltdown averaged $32 million each in personal compensation" -Institute for Policy Studies
I don't care where the President was born. I don't care what he thinks of Kanye or what Kanye thinks of Taylor Swift. I do care that we're in another Gilded Age. Economic inequality is greater in the United States than any other industrialized nation. Americans are literally facing real life death panels today in the form of insurance claims departments. We stand, almost all of us, at the mercy of the crappy corporations we work for; as long as our health care is completely tied to them we are beholden - unable to step out of line, to complain about workplace conditions, to attempt to unionize, as our workplaces slash our pay and vacations, increase our hours, bully, browbeat, threaten, and intimidate us at every turn. How easy it is to snuff us out, foreclose our homes, split our families. The dropout rate in poor school districts runs as high as 50% ensuring a permanent supply of troops to serve as chum satisfying our permanent demand of war.
And yet people march on Washington to carry the water for power. Any attempt to point out that we have become a plutocracy is met with fury. Nazis. Socialists. Terrorists.
That's all that's left. Goldman Sachs takes home nearly 2 billion in profit in a quarter but somehow ordinary Americans actually believe Obama is tearing apart the fabric of capitalism.
It's the ultimate case of Stockholm Syndrome. Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, and Simple Jack worm the plutocrats propaganda right into the brains of the oppressed. Instead of recognizing on whom the rage should be directed - it's funneled, as it's always been in American history, toward other marginalized groups.
Field slaves were taught to resent the house slaves. Poor white colonists, barely ekeing out livings were taught to despite the Native Americans, fighting over the same scraps as were they. "I ain't got no quarrel with the Viet Cong", Muhammad Ali insightfully said when refusing his induction into another American War against poor people of color in a far off place, "no Viet Cong ever called me nigger."
Go kill middle eastern shepherds while Goldman Sachs makes 2 billion dollars. Go kill Vietnamese. Or Koreans. They're the enemy. Look over there. Go kill Germans, they sunk the Lusitania. Go kill the Spanish, they sunk the Maine. Go kill Mexicans, they crossed the wrong parallel.
Hate gays. God says so. Or Hispanics. Learn the language or get out of the country. Or blacks. Simple Jack said Obama "hates white people." Rush Limbaugh said today "In Obama's America, the white kids now get beat up with the black kids cheering."
Go hate anyone you want. Just let the money keep rolling in.
While the body count keep rising.
There's reason to be angry about things that happen in the United States. Reason to march on Washington, reason to call the President of the United States a liar; reason for rage.
Like the 19 million in fines the five largest California insurance companies have had to pay out in the past 18 months.
Or that domestic violence is a pre-existing condition.
And that executives of bailed out companies are taking home millions.:
"From 2006 through 2008, the top five executives at the 20 banks that have accepted the most federal bailout dollars since the meltdown averaged $32 million each in personal compensation" -Institute for Policy Studies
I don't care where the President was born. I don't care what he thinks of Kanye or what Kanye thinks of Taylor Swift. I do care that we're in another Gilded Age. Economic inequality is greater in the United States than any other industrialized nation. Americans are literally facing real life death panels today in the form of insurance claims departments. We stand, almost all of us, at the mercy of the crappy corporations we work for; as long as our health care is completely tied to them we are beholden - unable to step out of line, to complain about workplace conditions, to attempt to unionize, as our workplaces slash our pay and vacations, increase our hours, bully, browbeat, threaten, and intimidate us at every turn. How easy it is to snuff us out, foreclose our homes, split our families. The dropout rate in poor school districts runs as high as 50% ensuring a permanent supply of troops to serve as chum satisfying our permanent demand of war.
And yet people march on Washington to carry the water for power. Any attempt to point out that we have become a plutocracy is met with fury. Nazis. Socialists. Terrorists.
That's all that's left. Goldman Sachs takes home nearly 2 billion in profit in a quarter but somehow ordinary Americans actually believe Obama is tearing apart the fabric of capitalism.
It's the ultimate case of Stockholm Syndrome. Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, and Simple Jack worm the plutocrats propaganda right into the brains of the oppressed. Instead of recognizing on whom the rage should be directed - it's funneled, as it's always been in American history, toward other marginalized groups.
Field slaves were taught to resent the house slaves. Poor white colonists, barely ekeing out livings were taught to despite the Native Americans, fighting over the same scraps as were they. "I ain't got no quarrel with the Viet Cong", Muhammad Ali insightfully said when refusing his induction into another American War against poor people of color in a far off place, "no Viet Cong ever called me nigger."
Go kill middle eastern shepherds while Goldman Sachs makes 2 billion dollars. Go kill Vietnamese. Or Koreans. They're the enemy. Look over there. Go kill Germans, they sunk the Lusitania. Go kill the Spanish, they sunk the Maine. Go kill Mexicans, they crossed the wrong parallel.
Hate gays. God says so. Or Hispanics. Learn the language or get out of the country. Or blacks. Simple Jack said Obama "hates white people." Rush Limbaugh said today "In Obama's America, the white kids now get beat up with the black kids cheering."
Go hate anyone you want. Just let the money keep rolling in.
While the body count keep rising.
Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics
Thursday, September 10, 2009
Monday night my Giants won a baseball game; this matters because we haven’t won since and absent a statistically improbable stretch we’re marking the days until elimination.
There’s no mystery in why this Giants club will fall short of the playoffs; we have a historic imbalance between our pitching (giving up .8 runs per 9 innings less than league average) and hitting (scoring half a run less per game than league average); according to Baseball Prospectus our making the playoffs with that little offensive punch would be an almost singular happening: Unfortunately, none of the aforementioned teams disgraced the batter’s box as badly as Bochy’s bunch. Teams can clearly find their way into playoff baseball with poor offenses and tremendous rotations, but no team has done so with an awful offense even remotely comparable to the one fielded by the 2009 Giants since the Dodgers made the playoffs in the 1996 campaign.
But Monday, Juan Uribe homered twice and tripled – we scored a truckload of runs and moved to our high water mark for the season, 14 games over .500.
Gwen Knapp, writing in the San Francisco Chronicle, said the real key to the win was a third inning bunt by Freddy Sanchez.
No, she really did. I know, right?
Here’s the thing – over a quarter century ago, one of the first matters argued by Bill James and subsequently proven incontrovertibly true is that bunting is harmful. Let’s say you are trailing 4-2 in the 8th inning, but have runners on first and second and nobody out. Your chance of scoring those runs decreases dramatically if you trade that scenario in to have one out and runners on 2nd and 3rd. Meaning – a successful bunt makes you less likely to score. This is true across the board in virtually any circumstance. There’s almost never a good reason to give up an out. We know this. Baseball’s almost entirely transparent. We keep really good records. If a situation in baseball has occured before, we know what the result was. If it's occured enough times, there's a predictive value to those past results.
Despite this, Knapp, who gets paid to write about the Giants, credited the win to a bunt.
The scenario wasn’t exactly as I described; I mean – two runs down in the 8th inning, no outs, two on – this could be a big inning, right – a crooked number that might save the season. Clearly, that’s not a spot where you want to sacrifice an out – I mean, who would possibly do that?
The Giants did it. Two days later. The bunt was unsuccessful. The Giants didn’t score. The Giants lost. The Giants lost. Again. The San Francisco Giants have had 30 years of the 2 greatest players in National League history and have never won a World Series. But we sure do bunt sometimes.
So what was today's game story? How did the Chronicle report this catastrophic blunder?
That the fault wasn’t the strategy – it was the failure to execute that strategy better.
Why is this important? It’s important because faced with that situation, the Giants, and similarly wrong thinking organizations throughout all manner of human endeavor, will bunt again. And sometimes, the bunt will work – and if it’s followed by a barrage of home runs – someone will wrongly credit the bunt.
And it’s going to cost us more games. And more games. And more games.
Why does this bunting myth persist? How can reasonable people, people who watch even more baseball than do I, fail to understand that even successful bunts are bad ideas – that they are making it less likely to win the game?
I think for two reasons.
One – because it feels like something’s happening. The runners are moving forward – and that’s what you want – you’re getting closer to the plate – closer to scoring. The cost of that movement, the out, isn’t properly appreciated; it’s subsumed by the flashiness of the success. If I run really fast off of a cliff and flap my arms there may be a moment where it feels to me like I'm flying - it may, if you take a snapshot at exactly the right time - may even look to an outsider writing a story, look like I'm flying.
But that's just 'cause the ground is too far away for me to notice yet that I am in free fall.
The other reason is because it privileges expertise – strategy – playing the game “the right way.” If I’m an absolute novice, a blank slate in baseball analysis, I would look at the two homers and the triple, the actual scoring blows, and say “that Uribe guy won the game” – but the knowledgeable, those who possess the secret, special sauce understanding of the game within the game, can chuckle from an insider’s position, “you just don’t get it; you can't understand how things really work.”
Those secret divine codes are how sportswriters – and managers – how broadcasters – and coaches – how the privileged elite keep their positions. As long as games are won and lost through hidden, special strategies like that bunt – through unquantifiable means like chemistry and leadership – it maintains the requirement that those who possess those special powers stay in their positions. How does the sportswriter keep a job in 2009, when every element of every game can be watched, recorded, and analyzed by anyone with the MLB package at least as well as those who sit in the press box – she has to possess a particular, specialized level of fancypants understanding. Sure, it looks like it was those two homers – but let me tell you it was really the bunt. And that manager standing in the corner wearing a uniform for no apparent reason – well he hasn’t crossed the plate a single time all year, but without him – who would call for those magical game changing bunts? Who will marshal collective energies of the great unwashed if not for the great and glorious leader, growing greater and more glorious every day? How can we, with only Juan Uribe and his trifling two homers and a triple, possibly win baseball games?
(Yes, this is turning into metaphor)
So, what does this have to do with the picture of the congressman from South Carolina who called the President of the United States a "liar" during a joint session of Congress last night?
I don’t know what lesson you’re going to learn from the trillion dollar endless war in Iraq.
Me, I’m learning it wasn’t poor execution, it was that we shouldn’t have done it in the first place. It wasn't that the generals failed to get down the bunt - it was that bunting is a poor percentage play.
I don’t know what lesson you’re learning from the economic collapse.
Me, I’m learning that it wasn’t poor business judgment by some lenders, that it was the strategy of laissez faire as preached/practiced by conservatives over the past quarter century. An entire mountain of inside baseball economic theories thoroughly discredited.
I don’t know what lesson you’re learning from the current health care crisis.
Me, I’m learning that it isn’t about too many lawsuits, not about a couple of overpaid CEOs, not about the disinclination of Americans to wash their hands. It’s about a system that makes health a private good as opposed to a public one. Every other democracy makes the choice that health is like fire protection or police protection – even if you can’t afford it, as a member of that society you should still receive coverage. Why don't we privatize the fire department (as we once did), or call the police force "socalized law and order"? Why have a public school system at all - if parents really want their kids to learn to read and write, they'd get good enough jobs to afford to send them to private school. Where they could pray. To Jesus.
Everyone else says their citizens deserve cops. And fire departments. And health care. It's a choice they make as a society.
We choose to bunt with 2 on and no one out. Which sounds like socialized baseball now that you think about it. Sacrificing for your fellow man.
The Congressman pictured way at the top, Joe Wilson from South Carolina, called Obama a liar last night during his speech – most have reacted negatively to this.
Let me go the other way.
On the substance, obviously the guy’s a crackpot. He called Obama a liar for saying illegal aliens won’t be covered under the health plan. He is in error. Democrats do not want to take doctors who would normally be saving Republican lives and instead force them to give abortions to illegal aliens.
(If Obama's a white dude, does the congressman from South Carolina do that? If Obama's a white dude, would a Georgia Senator say he needed to show some humility? When we look back on this - what will the historical context be of white southern congressmen shouting "you lie" as the first African-American President speaks before Congress? What will the context be when we talk about Simple Jack saying that the first African-American President "hates white people"? How challenging will it be to connect those dots? )
There are those who have reacted negatively to the conservatives in the town hall meetings who have shouted and screamed and called Obama a Nazi-socialist-grandma killa.
Let me go the other way.
On the substance, these people are subliterate. Universal health care doesn’t make you a Nazi; if it did, there’d be a lot of Scandanavians with Hitlerstache. And if a country with as much unfettered corporate power as ours is socialist, that means the world’s awash in red.
But the take that we should just be respectful and mind the great and powerful President as he dispenses wisdom is a bad lesson to learn. If the Democrats had shouted down Bush when he was talking about weapons of mass destruction, or passing tax cuts for the wealthy, or gutting civil liberties protection, or the whole host of other sins to noxious to speak about in a baseball post – wouldn’t that have been a better result?
I want a Congressman to tell truth to power. Loud, obnoxious, totally disrespectful truth.
If the only way to get that ability is to allow a Congressman to lie to power, I'll take that trade.
We don’t need more deference to authority. We need less. When the President orders a missile strike or the Giants manager orders a bunt, I want to be able to shout at him. I shouted at my television endlessly when Bruce Bochy sent Kevin Frandsen up to bunt, down 2 runs with nobody out in the 8th inning of a game we absolutely had to have. If I then had to sit in a room with him, I'd have screamed that he was a crummy manager and demanded to see proof that he was born in this country and not a secret Dodger raised from birth to inflitrate us, one who would probably hand Russ Ortiz the "winning ball" as he lifted him from a World Series we were 8 outs away from winning with a 5 run lead!!
Oh, yeah.
If you’re wrong, you’re wrong. Regardless of title, position, or protocol. And someone should say it.
Enough with the bunting already.
The Weekly Ten (Ten College Football Picks. Week 2)
Week One Record: 6-4 (you're welcome)
Lock Record: 1-0 (again, you're welcome)
Week Two Picks:
WVirginia -6.5 ECarolina (win)
Virginia Tech -19 Marshall (win)
Iowa -6.5 Iowa St. (win)
Auburn -14 Miss St. (win)
BYU -17.5 Tulane (win)
Navy -7.5 LaTech (win)
BC -20.5 Kent (win)
Utah -13.5 SJ St. (loss)
Florida -36.5 Troy (win)
Lock: UNLV +7 Oregon St. (win)
Week: 9-1, Overall: 15-5
Lock: 1-0, Overall: 2-0
Lock Record: 1-0 (again, you're welcome)
Week Two Picks:
WVirginia -6.5 ECarolina (win)
Virginia Tech -19 Marshall (win)
Iowa -6.5 Iowa St. (win)
Auburn -14 Miss St. (win)
BYU -17.5 Tulane (win)
Navy -7.5 LaTech (win)
BC -20.5 Kent (win)
Utah -13.5 SJ St. (loss)
Florida -36.5 Troy (win)
Lock: UNLV +7 Oregon St. (win)
Week: 9-1, Overall: 15-5
Lock: 1-0, Overall: 2-0
Week One - NFL Picks (with season predictions and my fantasy squads)).
Tuesday, September 8, 2009
I don't have any idea who will win the games in the first week of the NFL season. Don't bet them. Seriously. Pay attention to me in six weeks. This is just for completion purposes, as I'm going to pick every game all year. Seriously. Nothing good can come from playing a week one NFL game. Nothing. In fact, as I am going to pick every game all year in this space, consider ignoring it altogether. Move on. Go read something else. Know what's good? Mr Rogers clips on youtube. Mr. Rogers was a good man, and I'm a bit of an ass to be honest. Not bad hearted, just prickly.
Carolina +1 Philadephia (loss)
NYG -6.5 Washington (loss)
Tampa +6 Dallas (loss)
Minnesota -4 Cleveland (win)
Chicago +3.5 GBay (loss)
New Orleans -13 Detroit (win)
Miami +4 Atlanta (loss)
SF +6.5 Arizona (win)
St. Louis +8.5 Seattle (loss)
NYJ +4.5 Houston (win)
NE -10.5 Buff (loss)
Baltimore -13 KC (win)
Tenn +6 Pitt (win)
Den +4.5 Cincinnati (win)
Jax +7 Indy (win)
SD -9 Oak (loss)
Overall: 8-8
2009 NFL Picks
AFC East
1. New England 12-4
-Brady's back, maybe more importantly an over the hill defense has been turned over nicely; if their secondary, which still has a patchwork quality to it, improves, they're going to the Super Bowl. They still don't have any running backs unless Fred Taylor has more juice than it looked like last year.
2. New York Jets 7-9
-Sanchez is one of my guys, but I don't like rookie QB (and have last year's terrible Atlanta pick as evidence) and exascerbating the rookie problem is Sanchez is a rookie with a real small number of college starts. The schedule toughens up this year and the Jets were largely injury free a year ago. I really like the defense and think 2010 is much more promising than 2009.
3. Miami Dolphins 7-9
-This is why they invented the phrase regression to the mean. Fish rode soft schedule and gimmick offense to big improvement last year, they slide this year. That's how it usually goes. Pennington's backing up on one of my fantasy teams.
4. Buffalo 5-11 (under 7.5 wins)
-That over/under looks like a good investment. TO wasn't good last year and hasn't played this year; teams that turn over their OL usually require time to gell; I'm not in love with the "let's fire the OC" mentality that swept across the league in the past week, and while there's some young talent on defense, it seems a big stretch to see it showing up at an 8 win level.
AFC North
1. Pittsburgh 10-6
-Roethlisburger's my starting QB on 2 of 3 fantasy teams, so I'm counting on him to keep his hands to himself for a few months. There's no reason to think they won't be double digit wins again.
2. Baltimore 9-7 WC
-I loved the Ravens last year...if they started Troy Smith over Flacco. So, take that into consideration. Ravens led league in time of possession running their 1958 offense last year, some regression is likely. I've got Mason on 2 fantasy teams.
3. Cincinnati 6-10
-Do I need to start calling Chad Ochocinco now? I didn't last year, but at what point does that make me Floyd Patterson, just getting my ass whipped while Ali shouts "what's my name" (the equivalent would be what, "child please?") Chad's on one of my fantasy teams. Bengals have lots of Trojans (Palmer, Rivers, and Maualuga, one of my all time favorites, and I wanted to see him become a Niner in a hard way) so like the Jets in the East, I'll be rooting for them in the Central, but with that OL (probably a lost season, at least half season, for Andre Smith, right?) and lack of pass rush this is top end for this team.
4. Cleveland 4-12 (under 6.5)
-This is full on rebuild. That's a nice investment in the under.
AFC South
1. Indianapolis 12-4 (over 10 wins)
-They've won 12 games or more six straight years. That's a trend I'm willing to follow. I have Anthony Gonzalez on two fantasy teams.
2. Jacksonville 9-7 WC
-As a rule, when you have a good team that suffers a lot of injuries and the record suffers accordingly - look for a bounce back. This is that bounce back. I've got Garrard as my backup QB on one team. I've got Torry Holt on two teams.
3. Tennessee 8-8
-Albert Haynesworth was the best defensive player in football last year. He's gone, Titans regress.
4. Houston 8-8
-I rode Slaton/Johnson to a fantasy title last year; I have neither on any of my 3 teams this season. I do have Daniels twice, however. Texans turn the ball over too much; Schaub gets hurt too much; the Texans can't stop the run. I have to divisions predicted with no one under .500, which seems unlikely.
AFC West
1. San Diego 12-4 Super Bowl Champs (over 10 wins)
-I don't know if Shawne Merriman choked Tila Tequila (what a bizarre thing to type) over the weekend, but I do know if he were a baseball player with a PED suspension in his jacket the phrase roid rage would be applied all week. Just as if there were a baseball player with the kind of aggressive, way over the borderline-dirty reputation that Rodney Harrison has, his PED suspension would mean there was no network analyst job waiting for him post-career. I watched Mike Tyson documentary last week (it's good, not required watching, but good to see, Tyson's always been the most compelling athlete of his time) and my thought, as it always is, is about Evander Holyfield still getting to keep his reputation. The evidence linking Holyfield to steroids is at least as strong as the Bonds/Clemens evidence, there is "character" evidence that sportswriters care about when it's other guys (Holyfield has 11 children with 7 women), and as you watch those two fights with Tyson - and see the former cruiserweight Holyfield ram his oversized head into Tyson - over and over again - just butting him with impunity in both fights - Tyson's biting Holyfield looks less the product of a "bully giving up when confronted" (the way the Sports Industrial Complex always frames the acts) - and more of an admittedly unbalanced man taking extra-legal measures to protect himself. Why isn't Holyfield Barry Bonds (except, of course, that Bonds is a god, the greatest player in National League history) except more violent, worse with money, and with a dislike of birth control?
I'm picking the Chargers to win the whole thing. I have LT on one team, I have Rivers on one team. I have Vincent Jackson on two and the Chargers defense on one.
2. Kansas City 7-9
I've got Bowe on one team and Cassel and Charles backing up on another. This is a hard team to get a read on; if it's December and they're a surprise WC contender that wouldn't be a shock.
3. Oakland 5-11
-If it's December and Oakland isn't still a little embarassing that would be a shock - there's talent, more talent than this record, but that place is a mess.
4. Denver 5-11
-This is a bigger mess, at least for this season. Denver had a terrible defense and a pretty strong offense in 2008, they gutted the latter and left the former intact. This is a rebuild.
NFC East
1. New York Giants NFC Champs 11-5
I'm a Umenyiora guy; the increased DL depth benefits the defense - if the OL stays healthy again, this is my NFC pick. I've got Jacobs on one team and Hixon (underrated) on two.
2. Philadelphia 9-7 WC
-I've written about Vick before, but smart people (including Dave Zirin, the country's most prominent lefty sportswriter and I guy I look up to in the field) continue to get this wrong. So, let's phrase it like this. No, to answer the question, not everyone gets a "second" chance. To call running a dog torturing scheme for six years only a "first strike" seems a little perverse; had Vick just set up one rape stand, just attached jumper cables to electrocute one dog - and then after paying a penalty was reinstated, then he'd be on his second chance (assuming one doesn't care about whatever he put in his water bottle at the airport and the name Ron Mexico, which, to be fair, I don't). But 6 years of torturing animals is probably not the equivalent of one swing and a miss at a slider. Further, there are some crimes from which Vick wouldn't be reinstated. If Rae Carruth's conviction is overturned on a technicality, he wouldn't be reinstated. If OJ Simpson had killed his wife and her waiter friend in 1975 instead of 1995, he wouldn't have been reinstated after his acquittal. We can ratchet that down a few notches. What if it were rape? Mike Tyson did a couple of years for rape - if there were an NFL player convicted of rape and released after serving two years, would he be a backup QB two years later? What if he just gave a few 14 year old boys handjobs? What is a worse moral offense? 6 years of torturing dogs in as vicious a way imaginable - or maybe inviting a handful (pun intended) of teenage boys over to the crib for some Madden, some Jesus juice, and a little mutual wacking? If Vick had done that, would there be people wearing his jersey in Philadelphia today? If Vick had been ensnared by Dateline for cyberchatting up a young girl - would he have a "second" chance?
Lots of reasons not to get a second chance. We are absolutely saying as a society that we are less offended by Vick with his returning to the NFL.
As I've written before, it's a complicated ethical spot. I'm uncertain how to attack Vick and also defend my eating fried chicken just twenty minutes ago. Kill dogs and its prison. Kill pigs and its breakfast.
I see that too. And because of that it's not unreasonable to let Vick back in the league.
But it's also not unreasonable to be revolted by him. He can make a living if there's a team willing to sign his paycheck. I'm of the mind that no players should ever be banned by commissioners - if a team wants to sign Vick, as far as I'm concerned, it can.
But wow - can I say that dude, and now the Eagles, who I've liked - liked McNabb, liked Reid - they are dead to me. There are no Eagles on my fantasy teams; I hope they go 0-16. If Vick got hurt it wouldn't break my heart. We'd be a better country if my meat eating sins were held against me; I'd be a far better person if I had the discipline to enforce those prohibitions myself. Until then, until my/our ethical dissonance is satisfied, I have a new least favorite professional sports team.
3. Dallas 9-7
-Replacing my old least favorite team. As do all right thinking people, I hate the Cowboys. If they can stay healthy, they'll be better than this. If they can't, they'll be worse. Yeah, you're right. The Dodgers are still my real least favorite team.
4. Washington 8-8
-I've got Portis on one team - I still like Jason Campbell (I also still like Matt Leinart) and with Haynesworth aboard I just don't see this as a bad football team.
NFC North
1. Chicago 10-6 (over 8.5 wins)
I've got Forte in one league. I've got the defense in two. The OL turnover is a concern early and Cutler's move to Chicago doesn't really have a parallel in recent league history - that makes it a hard forecast - I'll go high and say Bears win a competitive division.
2. Green Bay 10-6 WC
-There's gonna be some firepower offensively, and I think the switch to the 3-4 will, at least by season's end, really send the Pack into the playoffs on a big roll.
3. Minnesota 9-7
-Remember when I was the only guy who hated Brett Favre? I've got Berrian on all 3 fantasy teams.
4. Detroit 4-12
-They'll be better.
NFC South
1. New Orleans 8-8
The offense will score a bunch; I've got Bush in one league. They'll need to score a bunch to compensate for how much they give up. I figure it comes out in the wash.
2. Carolina 8-8
Delhomme threw 37 interceptions the last time he played a game that counted.
3. Atlanta 7-9
-Curse of 370! More regression to the mean.
4. Tampa Bay 7-9
-Probably either the Saints or Panthers pick up a game and the Bucs lose one - but because I don't know which one of those teams is going to get that win, I'm sitting here with no one over .500.
NFC West
1. Seattle 9-7
-No Walter Jones, no Marcus Trufant, Julius Jones is the starting RB and still I have them winning the division. Welcome to the NFC West. I've got Mare on every team I have.
2. Arizona 7-9
-The Cards are solid favorites, but their pythag last year was 8-8, their becoming the worst ever SB team doesn't change their seasonlong mediocrity. Sure, they could go 9-7 and win the division and it wouldn't be a surprise, but they aren't playing February again.
3. San Francisco 7-9 (my team, for those unaware)
- Well, so, here are my Niners. I have none on any of 3 fantasy teams if that's a tip in some direction. If anything, this is a game too high, I don't see a scenario where we're 9-7. Maybe it's moving in the right direction; it's not demonstrably wrong, so that's something. I'm not in a position, after a decade of awful, to protest Singletary, despite his really not being my kind of coach. I'd rather have Leinart than any QB on the roster; the OL should be better; Glen Coffee looks like a terrific pick for a tandem backfield; I like Josh Morgan and (I think) still believe Crabtree will come to terms. There are some good players on defense. I like the general approach of the front office, more than I do, say the approach of my SFG - and I'm glad Jed has taken control. I didn't think the owner of the Niners would be so much younger than I am when I'm still so boyish and lovely myownself, but there you go. I will cheer. That's what I do.
4. St. Louis 6-10 (over 5.5 wins)
-The Rams are moving in the right direction. I've got SJax on two teams.
Those who were with me in the old place may recall that I play 3 fantasy leagues ($) each season in hoops, baseball, and NFL. I was on a good run until this baseball season, when I did nothing good in any league and there's just not a good excuse I can make for it. I was wrong and I'll own it.
Here's the damage, after a long Labor Day of drafting. All are 12 team, non PPR, with flex, head to head.
Team One
QB Roethlisberger, Pennington
RB SJax, Jacobs, RBrown, Mendenhall
WR AGonzalez, Ochocinco, Berrian, Holt, Hixon
TE Daniels
D Bears
K Mare
Team Two
QB Roethlisberger, Garrard
RB SJax, LT2, LWhite, Betts, Charles
WR VJax, Bowe, AGonzalez, Berrian
TE Daniels
D Bears
K Mare
Team Three
QB Rivers, Cassel
RB Forte, Portis, JJones, Bush
WR Ward, Holt, Berrian, Hixon, Mason
TE Winslow
D Chargers
K Mare
Carolina +1 Philadephia (loss)
NYG -6.5 Washington (loss)
Tampa +6 Dallas (loss)
Minnesota -4 Cleveland (win)
Chicago +3.5 GBay (loss)
New Orleans -13 Detroit (win)
Miami +4 Atlanta (loss)
SF +6.5 Arizona (win)
St. Louis +8.5 Seattle (loss)
NYJ +4.5 Houston (win)
NE -10.5 Buff (loss)
Baltimore -13 KC (win)
Tenn +6 Pitt (win)
Den +4.5 Cincinnati (win)
Jax +7 Indy (win)
SD -9 Oak (loss)
Overall: 8-8
2009 NFL Picks
AFC East
1. New England 12-4
-Brady's back, maybe more importantly an over the hill defense has been turned over nicely; if their secondary, which still has a patchwork quality to it, improves, they're going to the Super Bowl. They still don't have any running backs unless Fred Taylor has more juice than it looked like last year.
2. New York Jets 7-9
-Sanchez is one of my guys, but I don't like rookie QB (and have last year's terrible Atlanta pick as evidence) and exascerbating the rookie problem is Sanchez is a rookie with a real small number of college starts. The schedule toughens up this year and the Jets were largely injury free a year ago. I really like the defense and think 2010 is much more promising than 2009.
3. Miami Dolphins 7-9
-This is why they invented the phrase regression to the mean. Fish rode soft schedule and gimmick offense to big improvement last year, they slide this year. That's how it usually goes. Pennington's backing up on one of my fantasy teams.
4. Buffalo 5-11 (under 7.5 wins)
-That over/under looks like a good investment. TO wasn't good last year and hasn't played this year; teams that turn over their OL usually require time to gell; I'm not in love with the "let's fire the OC" mentality that swept across the league in the past week, and while there's some young talent on defense, it seems a big stretch to see it showing up at an 8 win level.
AFC North
1. Pittsburgh 10-6
-Roethlisburger's my starting QB on 2 of 3 fantasy teams, so I'm counting on him to keep his hands to himself for a few months. There's no reason to think they won't be double digit wins again.
2. Baltimore 9-7 WC
-I loved the Ravens last year...if they started Troy Smith over Flacco. So, take that into consideration. Ravens led league in time of possession running their 1958 offense last year, some regression is likely. I've got Mason on 2 fantasy teams.
3. Cincinnati 6-10
-Do I need to start calling Chad Ochocinco now? I didn't last year, but at what point does that make me Floyd Patterson, just getting my ass whipped while Ali shouts "what's my name" (the equivalent would be what, "child please?") Chad's on one of my fantasy teams. Bengals have lots of Trojans (Palmer, Rivers, and Maualuga, one of my all time favorites, and I wanted to see him become a Niner in a hard way) so like the Jets in the East, I'll be rooting for them in the Central, but with that OL (probably a lost season, at least half season, for Andre Smith, right?) and lack of pass rush this is top end for this team.
4. Cleveland 4-12 (under 6.5)
-This is full on rebuild. That's a nice investment in the under.
AFC South
1. Indianapolis 12-4 (over 10 wins)
-They've won 12 games or more six straight years. That's a trend I'm willing to follow. I have Anthony Gonzalez on two fantasy teams.
2. Jacksonville 9-7 WC
-As a rule, when you have a good team that suffers a lot of injuries and the record suffers accordingly - look for a bounce back. This is that bounce back. I've got Garrard as my backup QB on one team. I've got Torry Holt on two teams.
3. Tennessee 8-8
-Albert Haynesworth was the best defensive player in football last year. He's gone, Titans regress.
4. Houston 8-8
-I rode Slaton/Johnson to a fantasy title last year; I have neither on any of my 3 teams this season. I do have Daniels twice, however. Texans turn the ball over too much; Schaub gets hurt too much; the Texans can't stop the run. I have to divisions predicted with no one under .500, which seems unlikely.
AFC West
1. San Diego 12-4 Super Bowl Champs (over 10 wins)
-I don't know if Shawne Merriman choked Tila Tequila (what a bizarre thing to type) over the weekend, but I do know if he were a baseball player with a PED suspension in his jacket the phrase roid rage would be applied all week. Just as if there were a baseball player with the kind of aggressive, way over the borderline-dirty reputation that Rodney Harrison has, his PED suspension would mean there was no network analyst job waiting for him post-career. I watched Mike Tyson documentary last week (it's good, not required watching, but good to see, Tyson's always been the most compelling athlete of his time) and my thought, as it always is, is about Evander Holyfield still getting to keep his reputation. The evidence linking Holyfield to steroids is at least as strong as the Bonds/Clemens evidence, there is "character" evidence that sportswriters care about when it's other guys (Holyfield has 11 children with 7 women), and as you watch those two fights with Tyson - and see the former cruiserweight Holyfield ram his oversized head into Tyson - over and over again - just butting him with impunity in both fights - Tyson's biting Holyfield looks less the product of a "bully giving up when confronted" (the way the Sports Industrial Complex always frames the acts) - and more of an admittedly unbalanced man taking extra-legal measures to protect himself. Why isn't Holyfield Barry Bonds (except, of course, that Bonds is a god, the greatest player in National League history) except more violent, worse with money, and with a dislike of birth control?
I'm picking the Chargers to win the whole thing. I have LT on one team, I have Rivers on one team. I have Vincent Jackson on two and the Chargers defense on one.
2. Kansas City 7-9
I've got Bowe on one team and Cassel and Charles backing up on another. This is a hard team to get a read on; if it's December and they're a surprise WC contender that wouldn't be a shock.
3. Oakland 5-11
-If it's December and Oakland isn't still a little embarassing that would be a shock - there's talent, more talent than this record, but that place is a mess.
4. Denver 5-11
-This is a bigger mess, at least for this season. Denver had a terrible defense and a pretty strong offense in 2008, they gutted the latter and left the former intact. This is a rebuild.
NFC East
1. New York Giants NFC Champs 11-5
I'm a Umenyiora guy; the increased DL depth benefits the defense - if the OL stays healthy again, this is my NFC pick. I've got Jacobs on one team and Hixon (underrated) on two.
2. Philadelphia 9-7 WC
-I've written about Vick before, but smart people (including Dave Zirin, the country's most prominent lefty sportswriter and I guy I look up to in the field) continue to get this wrong. So, let's phrase it like this. No, to answer the question, not everyone gets a "second" chance. To call running a dog torturing scheme for six years only a "first strike" seems a little perverse; had Vick just set up one rape stand, just attached jumper cables to electrocute one dog - and then after paying a penalty was reinstated, then he'd be on his second chance (assuming one doesn't care about whatever he put in his water bottle at the airport and the name Ron Mexico, which, to be fair, I don't). But 6 years of torturing animals is probably not the equivalent of one swing and a miss at a slider. Further, there are some crimes from which Vick wouldn't be reinstated. If Rae Carruth's conviction is overturned on a technicality, he wouldn't be reinstated. If OJ Simpson had killed his wife and her waiter friend in 1975 instead of 1995, he wouldn't have been reinstated after his acquittal. We can ratchet that down a few notches. What if it were rape? Mike Tyson did a couple of years for rape - if there were an NFL player convicted of rape and released after serving two years, would he be a backup QB two years later? What if he just gave a few 14 year old boys handjobs? What is a worse moral offense? 6 years of torturing dogs in as vicious a way imaginable - or maybe inviting a handful (pun intended) of teenage boys over to the crib for some Madden, some Jesus juice, and a little mutual wacking? If Vick had done that, would there be people wearing his jersey in Philadelphia today? If Vick had been ensnared by Dateline for cyberchatting up a young girl - would he have a "second" chance?
Lots of reasons not to get a second chance. We are absolutely saying as a society that we are less offended by Vick with his returning to the NFL.
As I've written before, it's a complicated ethical spot. I'm uncertain how to attack Vick and also defend my eating fried chicken just twenty minutes ago. Kill dogs and its prison. Kill pigs and its breakfast.
I see that too. And because of that it's not unreasonable to let Vick back in the league.
But it's also not unreasonable to be revolted by him. He can make a living if there's a team willing to sign his paycheck. I'm of the mind that no players should ever be banned by commissioners - if a team wants to sign Vick, as far as I'm concerned, it can.
But wow - can I say that dude, and now the Eagles, who I've liked - liked McNabb, liked Reid - they are dead to me. There are no Eagles on my fantasy teams; I hope they go 0-16. If Vick got hurt it wouldn't break my heart. We'd be a better country if my meat eating sins were held against me; I'd be a far better person if I had the discipline to enforce those prohibitions myself. Until then, until my/our ethical dissonance is satisfied, I have a new least favorite professional sports team.
3. Dallas 9-7
-Replacing my old least favorite team. As do all right thinking people, I hate the Cowboys. If they can stay healthy, they'll be better than this. If they can't, they'll be worse. Yeah, you're right. The Dodgers are still my real least favorite team.
4. Washington 8-8
-I've got Portis on one team - I still like Jason Campbell (I also still like Matt Leinart) and with Haynesworth aboard I just don't see this as a bad football team.
NFC North
1. Chicago 10-6 (over 8.5 wins)
I've got Forte in one league. I've got the defense in two. The OL turnover is a concern early and Cutler's move to Chicago doesn't really have a parallel in recent league history - that makes it a hard forecast - I'll go high and say Bears win a competitive division.
2. Green Bay 10-6 WC
-There's gonna be some firepower offensively, and I think the switch to the 3-4 will, at least by season's end, really send the Pack into the playoffs on a big roll.
3. Minnesota 9-7
-Remember when I was the only guy who hated Brett Favre? I've got Berrian on all 3 fantasy teams.
4. Detroit 4-12
-They'll be better.
NFC South
1. New Orleans 8-8
The offense will score a bunch; I've got Bush in one league. They'll need to score a bunch to compensate for how much they give up. I figure it comes out in the wash.
2. Carolina 8-8
Delhomme threw 37 interceptions the last time he played a game that counted.
3. Atlanta 7-9
-Curse of 370! More regression to the mean.
4. Tampa Bay 7-9
-Probably either the Saints or Panthers pick up a game and the Bucs lose one - but because I don't know which one of those teams is going to get that win, I'm sitting here with no one over .500.
NFC West
1. Seattle 9-7
-No Walter Jones, no Marcus Trufant, Julius Jones is the starting RB and still I have them winning the division. Welcome to the NFC West. I've got Mare on every team I have.
2. Arizona 7-9
-The Cards are solid favorites, but their pythag last year was 8-8, their becoming the worst ever SB team doesn't change their seasonlong mediocrity. Sure, they could go 9-7 and win the division and it wouldn't be a surprise, but they aren't playing February again.
3. San Francisco 7-9 (my team, for those unaware)
- Well, so, here are my Niners. I have none on any of 3 fantasy teams if that's a tip in some direction. If anything, this is a game too high, I don't see a scenario where we're 9-7. Maybe it's moving in the right direction; it's not demonstrably wrong, so that's something. I'm not in a position, after a decade of awful, to protest Singletary, despite his really not being my kind of coach. I'd rather have Leinart than any QB on the roster; the OL should be better; Glen Coffee looks like a terrific pick for a tandem backfield; I like Josh Morgan and (I think) still believe Crabtree will come to terms. There are some good players on defense. I like the general approach of the front office, more than I do, say the approach of my SFG - and I'm glad Jed has taken control. I didn't think the owner of the Niners would be so much younger than I am when I'm still so boyish and lovely myownself, but there you go. I will cheer. That's what I do.
4. St. Louis 6-10 (over 5.5 wins)
-The Rams are moving in the right direction. I've got SJax on two teams.
Those who were with me in the old place may recall that I play 3 fantasy leagues ($) each season in hoops, baseball, and NFL. I was on a good run until this baseball season, when I did nothing good in any league and there's just not a good excuse I can make for it. I was wrong and I'll own it.
Here's the damage, after a long Labor Day of drafting. All are 12 team, non PPR, with flex, head to head.
Team One
QB Roethlisberger, Pennington
RB SJax, Jacobs, RBrown, Mendenhall
WR AGonzalez, Ochocinco, Berrian, Holt, Hixon
TE Daniels
D Bears
K Mare
Team Two
QB Roethlisberger, Garrard
RB SJax, LT2, LWhite, Betts, Charles
WR VJax, Bowe, AGonzalez, Berrian
TE Daniels
D Bears
K Mare
Team Three
QB Rivers, Cassel
RB Forte, Portis, JJones, Bush
WR Ward, Holt, Berrian, Hixon, Mason
TE Winslow
D Chargers
K Mare
51%
Monday, September 7, 2009
Only 51% of Kentuckians believe the President of the United States was born in the United States.
This is why every other industrialized country in the world has health care. And we have 18,000 Americans dying every year because of a lack of health insurance.
You want a death panel? A death panel is an insurance company denying you coverage because of a pre-existing condition. That didn't stop Rudy from waving the invisible bloody shirt on Meet the Press Sunday; saying that without tort reform the only way to pay for new health care is by pulling the plug on grandma.
Tort reform's a scam. I know you've been told otherwise, by the insurance lobby for the past twenty years, but here's a quick clue - there have been numerous states like mine, which have had aggressive tort reform, capping damage awards, limiting potential claims, narrowing the courthourse doorway opening to potential plaintffs. But somehow insurance premiums don't fall accordingly. Somehow, it turns out that insurance companies are really just interesting in making every dollar they can. Tort reform's just another way to accomplish that.
We're too dumb to survive. We are going to wave flags and and guns and bibles until we collapse. Lots of reasons for this. The corporatized media, as discussed in today's Greenwald is a good place to start.
I thought Oakland giving up a 1 for Richard Seymour was the dumbest thing I'd see all weekend. Then I thought that Juan Manuel Marquez drinking his own urine in preparation for his upcoming loss to Floyd Mayweather was the most backward thing I'd see all weekend. And then I saw that poll.
Half of the people in Kentucky think that Obama was born in the United States. Half. There you go.
Simple Jack Bakes Kwanzaa Cake.
Friday, September 4, 2009
I enjoy the Food Network, despite (or perhaps because) much of it is shot like porn, with the extreme closeups and the money shots.
I never gave much thought to Sandra Lee until I saw this. It's something she calls a Kwanzaa Cake - which naturally commemorates African heritage with popcorn, corn nuts, and apple pie filling. It's as if she saw the one Friends episode where Rachel makes that trifle with jam and ground beef and peas and sponge cake and thought "not only does that Jennifer Aniston have kick ass hair and sure can keep a man, but look how colorful that dessert looks! Peas and Jam! Why had no one thought of this before!"
It's as big a revelatory train wreck as you're likely to see, it's the moment where you recognize not that Sandra Lee had a bad day, it's that she simply has no idea what she's doing. It's bad enough that I'm always surprised she's been able to keep her gig; she was just so exposed as fraudulent, I can't believe anyone could view that and ever take her seriously again.
It was precisely the same thought I had watching this. Simple Jack goes on a nearly ten minute rant about how Rockefeller Center (and therefore NBC) is ground zero for a secret communist/fasicst/progressive plot based on hidden messages in the artwork that prefigure the rise of Obama.
No. I'm not kidding.
These types of lunatics used to be confined to the outhouse of political debate; Lyndon LaRouche has been around for decades; the John Birch Society decades before that. Probably you've gotten a INCOME TAX IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL, HERE'S THE PROOF! email from some wingnut (or Wesley Snipes); I used to encounter the occasional criminal defendant who said the .19 that he blew should be excluded from evidence as under principles of maritime law American criminal courts had no jurisdiction over his actions.
But now they're on TV. And the radio. And they have book deals. And they run school boards.
School districts in 7 states aren't going to run Obama's "hey kids, work hard, study, stay in school" speech next week out of concern that it will be communist propaganda. A "keep your kids at home" movement is underway among the right.
It seems, as has much of the right blather since the election, like purposeless hyperbole. You know Obama's not building an unholy socialist army of the night. If there are people who don't, they're too far gone to reason with.
But simultaneously in the news cycle comes this. That's the Texas state board of education preparing to change the way US history is taught in Texas, in a way that props up "significant conservative advocacy organizations and individuals, such as Newt Gingrich, Phyllis Schlafly, and the Moral Majority" without any sort of progressive equivalent. This is important because Texas and California drive the high school textbook market - a version of US History taught in Texas may well become the version of US History taught everywhere.
Under the shouts of "Obama's indoctrinating schoolchildren" comes actual propaganda forced into curricula.
You want to laugh when conservatives talk about death panels and concentration camps and not providing Republicans health care. You know it's bonkers. You know they're just Birchers with power.
But then you recognize they're Birchers with power. And you wonder what it is they have in store for us.
Unrelated: (1) Start Buster Posey. (2) I'm on Team Michele.
I never gave much thought to Sandra Lee until I saw this. It's something she calls a Kwanzaa Cake - which naturally commemorates African heritage with popcorn, corn nuts, and apple pie filling. It's as if she saw the one Friends episode where Rachel makes that trifle with jam and ground beef and peas and sponge cake and thought "not only does that Jennifer Aniston have kick ass hair and sure can keep a man, but look how colorful that dessert looks! Peas and Jam! Why had no one thought of this before!"
It's as big a revelatory train wreck as you're likely to see, it's the moment where you recognize not that Sandra Lee had a bad day, it's that she simply has no idea what she's doing. It's bad enough that I'm always surprised she's been able to keep her gig; she was just so exposed as fraudulent, I can't believe anyone could view that and ever take her seriously again.
It was precisely the same thought I had watching this. Simple Jack goes on a nearly ten minute rant about how Rockefeller Center (and therefore NBC) is ground zero for a secret communist/fasicst/progressive plot based on hidden messages in the artwork that prefigure the rise of Obama.
No. I'm not kidding.
These types of lunatics used to be confined to the outhouse of political debate; Lyndon LaRouche has been around for decades; the John Birch Society decades before that. Probably you've gotten a INCOME TAX IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL, HERE'S THE PROOF! email from some wingnut (or Wesley Snipes); I used to encounter the occasional criminal defendant who said the .19 that he blew should be excluded from evidence as under principles of maritime law American criminal courts had no jurisdiction over his actions.
But now they're on TV. And the radio. And they have book deals. And they run school boards.
School districts in 7 states aren't going to run Obama's "hey kids, work hard, study, stay in school" speech next week out of concern that it will be communist propaganda. A "keep your kids at home" movement is underway among the right.
It seems, as has much of the right blather since the election, like purposeless hyperbole. You know Obama's not building an unholy socialist army of the night. If there are people who don't, they're too far gone to reason with.
But simultaneously in the news cycle comes this. That's the Texas state board of education preparing to change the way US history is taught in Texas, in a way that props up "significant conservative advocacy organizations and individuals, such as Newt Gingrich, Phyllis Schlafly, and the Moral Majority" without any sort of progressive equivalent. This is important because Texas and California drive the high school textbook market - a version of US History taught in Texas may well become the version of US History taught everywhere.
Under the shouts of "Obama's indoctrinating schoolchildren" comes actual propaganda forced into curricula.
You want to laugh when conservatives talk about death panels and concentration camps and not providing Republicans health care. You know it's bonkers. You know they're just Birchers with power.
But then you recognize they're Birchers with power. And you wonder what it is they have in store for us.
Unrelated: (1) Start Buster Posey. (2) I'm on Team Michele.
The Weekly Ten: College Football Predictions (Season and Week One:)
Thursday, September 3, 2009
My top 20 is now finalized for the season.
Below are my week one picks - this season, I'm going to limit myself to ten picks each week (the weekly ten); last year I struggled early before having a terrific bowl season - history shows that (particularly in the NFL where I'm really likely to struggle) I'm better late than early.
With that said:
Tennessee -29.5 Western Kentucky (win)
Georgia +4.5 Oklahoma St. (loss)
Missouri +6.5 Illinois (win)
Wake -2.5 Baylor (loss)
USC (Fight On!) -32.5 San Jose St. (win)
Clemson -18.5 Mid Tenn St. (win)
Auburn -13.5 LaTech (win)
UCLA -19.5 SD St. (loss)
Va Tech +6.5 Alabama (loss)
Lock of the Week: Notre Dame -14.5 Nevada (win)
6-4. I'll take it.
2009 College Football Top 20.
1. Florida
2. USC (my team, and for a weekend, my undergraduate school, for those unaware)
3. Texas
4. Oklahoma
5. Georgia
6. Ohio St.
7. California
8. Georgia Tech
9. Virginia Tech
10. LSU (my girlfriend's team. We like her despite this.)
11. Clemson
12. Alabama
13. Auburn
14. West Virginia
15. Boston College
16. Florida St.
17. Notre Dame
18. Miami
19. Penn St.
20. Oklahoma St.
Consider the following: Ole Miss under 9 wins. Nebraska under 8 wins. North Carolina under 8 wins. Illinois under 8 wins.
Below are my week one picks - this season, I'm going to limit myself to ten picks each week (the weekly ten); last year I struggled early before having a terrific bowl season - history shows that (particularly in the NFL where I'm really likely to struggle) I'm better late than early.
With that said:
Tennessee -29.5 Western Kentucky (win)
Georgia +4.5 Oklahoma St. (loss)
Missouri +6.5 Illinois (win)
Wake -2.5 Baylor (loss)
USC (Fight On!) -32.5 San Jose St. (win)
Clemson -18.5 Mid Tenn St. (win)
Auburn -13.5 LaTech (win)
UCLA -19.5 SD St. (loss)
Va Tech +6.5 Alabama (loss)
Lock of the Week: Notre Dame -14.5 Nevada (win)
6-4. I'll take it.
2009 College Football Top 20.
1. Florida
2. USC (my team, and for a weekend, my undergraduate school, for those unaware)
3. Texas
4. Oklahoma
5. Georgia
6. Ohio St.
7. California
8. Georgia Tech
9. Virginia Tech
10. LSU (my girlfriend's team. We like her despite this.)
11. Clemson
12. Alabama
13. Auburn
14. West Virginia
15. Boston College
16. Florida St.
17. Notre Dame
18. Miami
19. Penn St.
20. Oklahoma St.
Consider the following: Ole Miss under 9 wins. Nebraska under 8 wins. North Carolina under 8 wins. Illinois under 8 wins.
The 200 Greatest Major League Baseball Players Ever, Revised and Updated, 2009 Ed.
Tuesday, September 1, 2009
Edit - I'm redoing this list, 2011 version, you can find it here.
I like sports. I like sports analysis and discussion. The grease that lubricates sports discussion has historically consisted of some variation of "Who's Better: X or Y?"
I recall being 10-11 years old and just laboriously pouring over Maury Allen's book where he listed the Top 100 players in MLB history; I'm a sucker for lists, be they films or books or rankings of Supreme Court justices, I want to play.
Performance analysis has advanced since 1981 (although you shouldn't tell Murray Chass...hell, you can't really tell Bob Costas; my guess is that we would agree far more often than not on the big issues of the day, perhaps even on more metaphysical matters - but when I watch he and Keith Olbermann talk about baseball as if the sabermetric insights of the past quarter-century haven't happened, that they continue to deny the massive paradigm shift that has occurred during their professional careers and instead revert back to the same level of understanding they had as children, I get incredibly frustrated) and my views have evolved; first with Bill James, then with Pete Palmer, then Rob Neyer and Baseball Prospectus.
This is my ranking of the 200 Best Major League Baseball Players of All Time; my reliance is not on anecdote, not on fitting into a particular childhood narrative that player X simply must be better than player y. My reliance is on facts and not faith, on statistics and not storyline. I happen to believe that baseball is more objectively quantifiable - the "truth" of what happens on a baseball diamond more knowable than in virtually any human endeavor.
WARP3 is, in my view, the superior "universal theory of everything" number; I prefer it vastly to Win Shares (heresy to some, I recognize) as expressing actual career value. The list is skewed to career, as opposed to peak value - I'm attempting to express who had the greatest careers as opposed to "on any given day, who would you pick to win one baseball game for you." That's a reasonable list, I guess, but it's not this one. I add the Pete Palmer numbers, which used to be expressed in the Total Player Rating from Total Baseball and are now BFW and PW in the Baseball Encyclopedia as they serve to express the value of peak, and give a different defensive perspective than the Davenport translations from WARP3. Additionally, I've now added a "Most Valuable Player Quality" seasonal component which further props up the value of peak to a point where that's less a disparity than it was in previous incarnations of the list. BP expresses peak itself with a JAWS number, taking the 7 best years and combining it with the WARP3, and at some point, all of those numbers will be sortable and, one assumes, they'll put out their own list of this type; I might even prefer it to mine. The defensive metrics have really evolved even since I began putting the list together, that partially explains the differences between the version you're about to see and any previous you may have read from me. The level of evolution has also served to further reduce the degree to which this is just a career as opposed to a peak list. It's still solely a regular season list, completely ignoring the postseason.
Right now, I want to read a book that, using the statistics which I believe are most revelatory, lists the 200 best MLB players ever. A book that adjusts for era and ballpark; that doesn't reflexively list the same top players at each position that the author decided upon when he was 12...
Spoiler alert.....
The greatest catcher of all time is no longer Johnny Bench.
...if there was a book like that, I'd buy it.
But there's not. So - I'm writing this list.
I've done a ton of player comments, some of which aren't bad and I'll be moving them over as time permits; if circumstances ever allow me not to teach 7 classes ever term, I may get back to them. I'm developing a twitch.
My working plan has always been to review the list after the 2010 season; we'll see where things stand then.
I have football lists, they'll be out by the time the season starts, and I have some basketball stuff - largely that's all made up (football less than hoops, which is entirely made up). But, at least for my own mind (and I'm a bit of a hard case) this list is definitive. At least for today. Everything's provisional when we're talking about tomorrow. The numbers are as of August, 2009, save for the Pete Palmer BFW number - I have the fielder wins through only 2007. I've listed primary teams/positions below.
Thank god it's done. Exhausting.
From 1871-2008, here are the 200 greatest MLB careers.
1. BABE RUTH RF /LF/P
1914-35
Red Sox/Yankees
BFW 112
PW 17
WARP3 198.7
OPS+ 207
ERA+ 122
MVPQuality: 1916, 18, 19, 20, 21, 23 (best season), 24, 26, 27, 31
2. BARRY BONDS LF
1986-2007
Pirates/Giants
WARP3 192.6
BFW 128.7
OPS+ 182
MVP Quality: 1990, 92, 93 (best season), 95, 96, 2001, 02, 03, 04,
-Bonds and Ruth are close; in the previous version of this list Barry beat Babe by the equivalent value of one extra MVP quality season and now it’s flip-flopped (what I’m saying there isn’t that he did actually have one more MVPQ season, although he did, but when you crunch all the numbers, that’s how far ahead he is of Bonds – if they played at the exact same time, it would be like if they had the same career for 19 years, but in year 20, Bonds retired and Ruth won the MVP Award and then retired; so it’s extra close, but Ruth does win the race. In the commentary portion throughout this list, I’ll refer to the distance between guys in terms of how many MVPQ years separate them and that’s what I’ll mean) with the new adjustments Ruth retakes his place as the best baseball player ever, which, since Barry’s my guy, disappoints me. Third place is five MVP quality seasons behind; it's far enough behind that I really don't think there's a serious argument that Bonds and Ruth aren't the two best baseball players who ever lived.
3. WILLIE MAYS CF
1951-73
Giants
WARP3 177.6
BFW 84.4
OPS+ 156
MVPQ: 1954 (best season), 55, 57, 58, 59, 60, 62, 63, 64, 65
4. WALTER JOHNSON RHP
1907-27
Senators
PW 89.9
WARP3 172
ERA+ 147
MVPQ: 1912, 13 (best) 14, 15, 16, 18, 19
-Johnson’s the best pitcher who ever lived; Mays is one MVPQ season up on the Train, and Johnson’s 3 up on the next group. So, just as I’m comfortable that, in some order, Ruth/Bonds need to be considered 1-2; in some order, Mays/Johnson need to be considered 3-4. I really think those are matters solidly proven. It does not escape notice to this Giants fan that San Francisco had the two greatest players in NL history for a combined quarter century and never won a World Series.
5. TY COBB CF
1905-28
Tigers
BFW 85.9
WARP3 158.5
OPS+ 167
MVPQ: 1909, 10, 11, 15, 17 (best)
6. HONUS WAGNER SS
1897-17
Pirates
BFW 82.2
WARP3 158.7
OPS+ 150
MVPQ: 1900, 01, 07, 08 (best) 09, 12
-There is no statistically significant difference between Cobb and Wagner; you put them in either order – but recognize now we are 10 MVPQ seasons behind Ruth.
7. HANK AARON RF
1954-76
Braves
BFW 83
WARP3 159.4
OPS+ 155
MVPQ: 1956 (best season) 57, 59, 60
8. ROGER CLEMENS RHP
1984-07
Red Sox/Yankees
PW73.5
WARP3 164.5
ERA+ 143
MVPQ: 86, 87, 90, 97 (best), 05
-Aaron’s half an MVPQ season behind Cobb; he and Clemens are statistically the same. Clemens is the second best pitcher who ever lived – three MVPQ behind Johnson and 2 ahead of the next pitcher on the list…who I will keep secret for now. Secrets!
9. STAN MUSIAL 1B/LF/RF
1941-63
Cardinals
BFW 76
WARP3 152.8
OPS+ 159
MVPQ: 1943 (best) 44, 46, 48, 49, 51
-Musial’s less than one MVPQ behind Aaron, also less than one MVPQ ahead of #10.
10. RICKEY HENDERSON LF
1979-03
Athletics/Yankees
BFW 70.3
WARP3 155.8
OPS+ 127
MVPQ: 1980, 81, 85, 90 (best)
-And that’s your top ten MLB players ever. Canseco said there is a current HOF’er who used steroids. Rickey’s best season was 1990, one of the years he played with Jose Canseco. Doesn’t make it so and if it was so, I don’t particularly care. Just pointing it out. Rickey’s 2 MVPQ seasons behind Cobb.
11. NAP LAJOIE 2B
1896-16
Phillies/Indians
BFW 95.4
WARP3 125.9
OPS+150
MVPQ: 1901, 03, 04, 06, 10 (best)
-Who is the greatest second baseman who ever lived? My vote’s for Lajoie; he and Rickey are basically interchangeable for the last spot in the top 10.
12. ROGERS HORNSBY 2B
1915-37
Cardinals/Cubs
BFW 86
WARP3 128.6
OPS+ 175
MVPQ 1920, 21, 24 (best), 27, 28, 29,
-Holy cats look at that OPS+! Half of an MVP season behind Nap. Hornsby was the starting second baseman on my subjective all time team from the time I was 8 years old, but not anymore, despite the advantage with the bat.
13. TRIS SPEAKER CF
1907-28
Red Sox/Indians
BFW 82.8
WARP3 143.7
OPS+ 158
MVPQ: 1912, 14 (best)
-Speaker’s 1 ½ MVPQ seasons behind Musial; he and Hornsby literally could not be closer. I think probably in constructing the all-time team who you have to bump to the reserves is Gehrig, that you need to make Speaker your 6th and final OF and move Musial to start at first. I’m going to say it’s Musial and Lajoie on the right side of the all-time infield. How about that!
14. GREG MADDUX RHP
1986-06
Cubs/Braves
BFW 65.4
WARP3 155.6
ERA+ 132
MVPQ 1992, 94, 95 (best)
-The third greatest pitcher who ever lived. Maddux is a little over 2 MVPQ behind Clemens and is right in this statistical bunch with Hornsby and Speaker.
15. TED WILLIAMS LF
1939-60
Red Sox
BFW 86.5
WARP3 128.2
OPS+ 191
MVPQ 1941, 42, 46 (best) 47
-Yes, that means Ted Williams, by OPS+ the second greatest hitter who ever lived, doesn’t make my all time baseball team.
16. CY YOUNG RHP
1890-11
Spiders/Red Sox
PW 77
WARP3 140.3
ERA+ 138
MVPQ: 1893, 95, 01 (best)
-Young is the 4th greatest pitcher who ever lived, just a half of an MVPQ behind Maddux.
17. EDDIE COLLINS 2B
1906-30
Athletics/White Sox
BFW 73.1
WARP3 137.8
OPS+ 141
MVPQ 1909 (best)10, 13, 15, 20
-Collins/Young/Williams are all in a bunch, sort them any way you like for the overall ranking. Collins is just a little more than half of an MVPQ season behind Hornsby, so a full season behind Lajoie. There just isn’t much to choose from among all three guys; if you were to prefer a different ordering, I wouldn’t have a strong objection.
18. MEL OTT RF
1926-47
Giants
BFW60.7
WARP3 141.4
OPS+ 155
MVPQ 1932 (best) 34, 35, 36, 38 (best)
-Ott, the third Giant in the top 20 MLB players who ever lived, albeit not SFG, so I don’t really feel proprietary to the same degree I do Bonds/Mays, is one MVPQ season behind the Splinter.
19. MICKEY MANTLE CF
1951-68
Yankees
BFW 71.8
WARP3 124.9
OPS+ 172
MVPQ 1955, 56, 57 (best) 58, 61
-Drop another 50% of an MVP season from Ott and there's Mantle.
20. JOE MORGAN 2B
1963-84
Astros/Reds
BFW 68.5
WARP3 127.4
OPS+ 132
MVPQ 1972, 73, 74, 75 (best), 76
-Morgan and Mantle are statistically interchangeable – Morgan’s 1 ½ MVPQ behind Collins, so about 2 behind Hornsby and 2 ½ behind Lajoie. I love me some Joe Morgan, but I really don’t think there’s a great argument he’s the best 2B ever.
21. MIKE SCHMIDT 3B
1972-89
Phillies
BFW 77.3
WARP3 122.7
OPS+ 147
MVPQ 1976 (best) 81
-Schmidt, of course, is the greatest third baseman ever and now, except for catcher, the starting lineup for my all time team is set:
1B Musial
2B Lajoie
SS Wagner
3B Schmidt
LF Bonds
CF Mays
RF Aaron
P Johnson
22. GROVER CLEVELAND ALEXANDER RHP
1911-30
Phillies/Cubs/Cardinals
PW 62.9
WARP3 132.2
ERA+ 135
MVPQ 1915, 16, 20 (best)
-And now we have a 5 man starting staff for the all time team. All right handed. But the lefties are coming soon.
1. Johnson
2. Clemens
3. Maddux
4. Young
5. Alexander
Pete and Schmidt are in a dead heat over first man outside the top 20.
23. FRANK ROBINSON RF/LF
1956-76
Reds/Orioles
BFW 65
WARP3 126.1
OPS+ 154
MVPQ 1966
-Drop back a full MVPQ season from Alexander and you have Frank.
24. LOU GEHRIG 1B
1923-39
Yankees
BFW 70.9
WARP3 113.7
OPS+ 179
MVPQ 1927 (best), 34
-Half an MVPQ season behind Frank comes Gehrig.
25. EDDIE MATHEWS 3B
1952-68
Braves
BFW 53
WARP3 122.2
OPS+ 143
MVPQ 1954, 55, 57 (best) 59, 60
-In his career, Mathews topped 10 WARP3 seasons 5 times (5 MVPQ seasons) to his teammate Aaron’s 4. Now, he still finished 6 ½ MVPQ seasons behind Aaron and winds up here, rounding out the top 25 – but when they were together, it shouldn’t have been framed that Aaron was necessarily the superior player. Matthews, Gehrig, and the guy next on the list are essentially the same.
26. WARREN SPAHN LHP
1942-65
Braves
PW 51.4
WARP3 132.4
ERA+ 118
MVPQ 1947, 53 (best)
-If you wanted to slide Gehrig down to this spot and move Spahn up you could, and that would mean the Braves had a decade of 3 of the 25 greatest players who ever lived. Spahn’s the best lefty ever. He’d be the long man on my all time team.
27. ALEX ROGRIGUEZ (ACTIVE) SS/3B
1994 -
Mariners/Yankees
BFW (2007) 57.4
WARP3 112.1
OPS+ 147
MVPQ 1996 (best) 98, 2000, 07
-So, how high will ARod wind up? By the end of 2010, you’d expect that he’d pull even with that group of 3 bunched up ahead, maybe even nosing them out to be ranked 24th all time. He’ll take out Frank by end of 2011. He turns 37 during the 2012 season, it’s an open question, I’d suggest, if he makes the top 20.
28. WADE BOGGS 3B
1982-99
Red Sox/Yankees
BFW 50.5
WARP3 116.6
OPS+ 130
MVPQ 1985, 86, 87, 88 (best) 89
-Boggs and ARod are still, right now, in the same spot.
29. RANDY JOHNSON (ACTIVE) LHP
1988-
Mariners/Diamondbacks
PW (2007) 49.2
WARP3 120.6
ERA+ 136
MVPQ 1995, 02, 04 (best)
-Johnson’s the second best lefty who ever lived; he’s right there in the same spot with Boggs and ARod, if he can come back for 2010, he’s gonna go past Boggs into 28th. On my all time team, he’d be the closer.
30. LEFTY GROVE LHP
1925-41
Athletics/Red Sox
PW 59.1
WARP3 113.9
ERA+ 148
MVPQ 1931, 36 (best)
- You have to love that Grove and Johnson are in a dead flat tie; sure, it might be better to take one of the lefties in my all time pen and make him a starter – but instead, Grove becomes the left handed set up man.
31. CHRISTY MATHEWSON RHP
1900-16
Giants
PW 56.3
WARP3 107.9
ERA+ 135
MVPQ 1901, 05, 08 (best) 09
-If it’s a 9 man pitching staff (and it would be) on the all time 25 man roster, this is where it ends. So the pen becomes Johnson/Grove/Matty/Spahn. Mathewson is just a tick, like 30% of an MVPQ season, so not much at all, behind Grove/Unit/Boggs/ARod through 2009.
32. TOM SEAVER RHP
1967-86
Mets/Reds
PW49.5
WARP3 117.9
ERA+ 127
MVPQ 1971 (best) 73
-Seaver’s another 30% of an MVPQ behind Mathewson, so only about half a season behind Grove/Johnson – only 1 ½ behind Spahn, which is how close he finishes to being the 6th best pitcher who ever lived.
33. TOM GLAVINE LHP
1987-08
Braves/Mets
PW 41.4
WARP3 125.3
ERA+ 118
MVPQ none
-No, you didn’t know that Tom Glavine was the 11th best pitcher who ever lived. He’s a half MVPQ behind Seaver; the next few guys are in a clump.
34. CAL RIPKEN SS/3B
1981-01
Orioles
BFW 43
WARP3 113.5
OPS+ 112
MVPQ 1983, 84, 91 (best)
-Here’s good to recognize. Ripken was great, obviously, the 34th greatest player who ever lived and the third best shortstop behind Wagner and ARod.
-But now we are 17 MVPQseasons behind Ruth and Bonds.
-Putting it another way, the distance between Bonds/Ruth and Glavine/Ripken/Thomas/Brett is like the distance between Glavine/Ripken/Thomas/Brett and never having played major league baseball. You are as close to Cal Ripken as Cal Ripken is to Babe Ruth and Barry Bonds. Not all Hall of Famers are created equal and we’re still in the top 50 players who ever lived.
35. FRANK THOMAS 1B/DH
1990-2008
White Sox
BFW 50.8
WARP3 105.3
OPS+ 156
MVPQ 1991, 92, 94 (best)
36. GEORGE BRETT 3B
1973-93
Royals
BFW 42.8
WARP3 112.4
OPS+ 135
MVPQ 1976 (best) 79, 80
-As indicated, you can order those last 4 guys, Glavine-Brett basically anyway you like. Brett is one MVPQ season behind Seaver; Brett ranks behind Boggs/Mathews/Schmidt in the all time 3B rankings – he’s 2 MVPQ seasons behind Boggs, 2 ½ behind Mathews, and 4 behind Schmidt.
37. PEDRO MARTINEZ RHP (ACTIVE)
1992-
Expos/Red Sox/Mets
PW 50.5
WARP3 102.8
ERA+ 154
MVPQ 1997, 99, 00 (best)
-Pedro’s in that group of 4 too, just a half MVPQ season behind Glavine, it looks like he winds up somewhere right here.
38. IVAN RODRIGUEZ C (ACTIVE)
1991-
Rangers/Tigers
BFW (2007) 42.7
WARP3 116.9
OPS+ 109
MVPQ none
-The greatest catcher who ever lived is Pudge Rodriguez. Half an MVPQ behind Frank Thomas.
39. JOE DIMAGGIO CF
1936-51
Yankees
BFW 45.8
WARP3 101.2
OPS+ 155
MVPQ 1937, 39, 41 (best) 48
-In a dead heat with Pudge; the Clipper is half an MVPQ season behind Brett. It’s been awhile since there’s been an OF (Robinson) DiMaggio’s 3 ½ MVPQ seasons behind him; it’s clear to me that’s a solid break. If you’re willing to pretend Musial’s a first baseman, that would be a good top ten OF of all time, ending at Frank, with the second ten starting here.
40. JOHNNY BENCH C
1967-83
Reds
BFW 42.4
WARP3 105.9
OPS+ 126
MVPQ 1970, 72 (best) 74
-Essentially tied with Pudge; the third catcher is a little less than 2 MVP seasons behind – so I’m good with calling them the two best catchers who ever lived. If you aren’t taking the walk with me in starting Rodriguez over Bench, I understand. Here’s my all time team:
C Pudge, Bench
1B Musial, Gehrig
2B Lajoie, Hornsby
SS Wagner
3B Schmidt
Uti ARod
LF Bonds Rickey
CF Mays Cobb
RF Ruth Aaron
P Big Train
P Clemens
P Maddux
P Young
P Pete Alexander
P Spahn
P Grove
P Mathewson
P Seaver
Closer Unit
41. JEFF BAGWELL 1B
1991-05
Astros
BFW 53.1
WARP3 97.2
OPS+ 149
MVPQ 1994 (best) 96
-If you were inclined, you could switch Bagwell and Bench for that 40th spot. We’re now 20 MVPQ seasons behind Ruth/Bonds.
42. OZZIE SMITH SS
1978-96
Cardinals
BFW44.8
WARP3 105.5
OPS+ 87
MVPQ 1985
-A little over one MVPQ season behind Ripken for that 3rd SS spot; 3 behind ARod; 10 behind Honus Wagner. Ozzie’s the only minus bat on the list.
43. JOHN SMOLTZ RHP (ACTIVE)
1988-
Braves
PW 39
WARP3 110.3
ERA+ 125
MVPQ 1996
-Smoltz is in a flatfooted tie with Ozzie; enough that since he looks like he might have a drop left in the tank for September of ’09 I maybe should consider flip-flop. If Smoltz can pitch in 2010, he has a chance to crack the top 40. More likely however, getting to #41 would be his top end.
44. ARKY VAUGHAN SS
1932-48
Pirates
BFW 43.3
WARP3 100.3
OPS+ 136
MVPQ 1934, 35 (best) 36
45. JIMMIE FOXX 1B
1925-45
Athletics/Red Sox
BFW 58.3
WARP3 94
OPS+ 163
MVPQ none
-Two more guys in a dead heat; Vaughan’s essentially tied with Ozzie, you can switch them if you like to get more offense. Foxx is 40% of an MVPQ season behind Bagwell.
46. ROBIN YOUNT SS/CF
1974-93
Brewers
BFW40
WARP3 104.5
OPS+ 115
MVPQ 1982 (best) 83
47. CAP ANSON 1B
1871-97
Cubs
BFW 35.4
WARP3 115
OPS+ 141
MVPQ none
-Yount and Anson are also in a tie; if you’re considering Yount a SS; he’s only 1 ½ MVPQ seasons behind Ripken – he’s right in that Ozzie/Vaughan group. Anson’s only 1 ½ behind Thomas; he’s right there at 1B with Bagwell and Foxx.
48. BOBBY GRICH 2B
1970-86
Orioles/Angels
BFW 50.6
WARP3 92.4
OPS+ 125
MVPQ 1973 (best) 75
-Bobby Grich had the same career value as did Robin Yount; he is without question a HOF’er. I don’t know, on this list, where the HOF should end (actually, I do – like about 166 – I want my HOF minimum score to be the equivalent of 10 MVPQ seasons – that’s what I want – and that ends at about #166. That’s where I’d draw my HOF line. Boom) but Grich is nowhere near the back of the line. It’s been a long time since Joe Morgan was revealed as the 4th all time 2B – Grich is well below that level; Grich is 6 MVPQ seasons behind Morgan, and 8 ½ behind the best, Lajoie. So, Grich isn’t at that level, but he’s 1 MVPQ season ahead of the next 2B on the list (secrets) so I’m going to say he’s here – Bobby Grich is the 5th best second baseman who ever lived.
49. KEN GRIFFEY CF (ACTIVE)
1989-
Mariners/Reds
BFW (2007) 47.8
WARP3 94.7
OPS+ 137
MVPQ 1998
-I know you love you some Ken Griffey and you think he and Bonds were basically the same except for the steroids and you’re just wrong. There’s 20 MVPQ seasons of difference between the two of them; there’s no earthly way to make the claim. Griffey’s value is done; he’s half an MVPQ season behind Yount; he’s 1 ½ behind DiMaggio, so I think you really can’t move him any higher than this up the OF list. The next two guys are also active and with more left – so this is the last time Griffey’s going to be in the top 50.
50. ALBERT PUJOLS 1B (ACTIVE)
2001-
Cardinals
BFW (2007) 35.3
WARP3 90.7
OPS+ 172
MVPQ 2003, 04, 07, 08, 09 (best)
51. MARIANO RIVERA RHP (ACTIVE)
1995-
Yankees
PW 43.2
WARP3 98.9
MVPQ 2008
ERA+ 201
-You could order these three guys any way you like; I have a genetic predisposition against one inning pitchers so I want Rivera here, at least for this release of the list – but obviously that 201 ERA+ means that he is the Mac. It’s entirely possible that I should replace Seaver with Rivera on the all time team and just go with an actual closer. Who the hell knows how much he has left; it doesn’t appear to be stopping anytime soon. I’m willing to say by the end of 2010 Rivera is just outside the top 40. He probably goes by Smoltz on the all time pitching list. He maybe goes by Pedro by the end of 2011. He won’t catch Seaver I wouldn’t think. Rivera will retire as one of the 40 greatest players ever.
-Pujols still has some peak left; he’s ten years younger than Rivera and Griffey (probably). Man…okay, by the end of 2010, Pujols goes by Anson and Foxx and catches Bagwell, or maybe is just behind – wedged between Bagwell and Foxx. By the end of 2011 he’s just behind Frank Thomas. By the end of 2012 – now he’s in his decline phase; he’s just outside the top 30 of all time. Where does he finish…maybe top 20. If you have to say, Pujols is going to go past Gehrig to be considered by most the greatest first baseman ever. Mickey Mantle is a reasonable goal.
52. ROGER CONNOR 1B
1880-97
Giants
BFW 43.4
WARP3 102
OPS+ 153
MVPQ 1885
53. PAUL MOLITOR DH/3B
Brewers/Blue Jays/Twins
BFW 36.6
WARP3 108.8
OPS+ 122
MVPQ none
54. GEORGE DAVIS SS
1890-09
Giants/White Sox
BFW 50.7
WARP3 94.4
OPS+ 121
MVPQ none
55. BOB GIBSON RHP
1959-75
Cardinals
PW 45
WARP3 96.1
ERA+ 127
MVPQ 1968
56. STEVE CARLTON LHP
1965-88
Cardinals/Phillies
PW 34
WARP3 103.8
ERA+ 115
MVPQ 1972 (best) 80
57. BARRY LARKIN SS
1986-04
Reds
BFW 41.9
WARP3 98.8
OPS+ 116
MVPQ 1994
58. CARL YASTRZEMSKI LF/1B
1961-83
Red Sox
BFW 42.7
WARP3 94.8
OPS+ 129
MVPQ 1967 (best) 68
-Those 7 guys are all in the same spot – and really they’re in the same spot as those 3 active players who just came before, but without any chance to make it better. Davis and Larkin are about a full MVPQ season behind Ozzie and Vaughan. Yeah, actually Larkin is exactly 1 MVPQ season behind Ozzie. Davis and Connor were briefly teammates for the pre turn of the century Giants. Molitor’s half an MVPQ season behind his longtime teammate Yount. Look at Gibson and Carlton sitting there back to back like a ferocious 1-2 in a pitching rotation. They’re both a little less than 1 MVPQ season behind Smoltz – a little more than 2 MVPQ behind Glavine. Yaz is 1 MVPQ season behind Foxx; 8 MVPQ seasons behind Ted Williams.
59. GARY CARTER C
1974-92
Expos/Mets
BFW 38.8
WARP3 98.9
OPS+ 115
MVPQ 1982
-No, it’s not just because Gary Carter once said about me “there’s someone who knows a lot about baseball” – No! It’s strictly by analysis of the numbers – the Kid is the 3rd greatest catcher who ever lived. He’s solidly behind Bench, almost 2 MVPQ seasons – and just barely ahead of the 4th catcher, ½ an MVPQ over…(secrets). I am totally good with this.
60. MANNY RAMIREZ RF/LF (ACTIVE)
93-
Indians/Red Sox
BFW (2007) 40.5
WARP3 94.9
OPS+ 155
MVPQ none
-Manny’s half an MVPQ behind Yaz, speaking of Red Sox LF. By the end of 2010 he could be in that group that’s just outside the top 50. So, getting by Griffey eventually is a reasonable goal; he’s unlikely to catch DiMaggio and make the top 40.
61. CARL HUBBELL RHP
1928-43
Giants
PW40.2
WARP3 90.2
ERA+ 130
MVPQ 1932, 33 (best) 36
62. LOU WHITAKER 2B
1977-95
Tigers
BFW 35.2
WARP3 103.3
OPS+ 116
MVPQ none
-Your 6th best 2B ever. Lou Whitaker.
63. ROBIN ROBERTS RHP
1948-66
Phillies/Orioles
PW 30.3
WARP3 102.1
ERA+ 113
MVPQ 1953 (best) 54
64. KID NICHOLS RHP
1890-06
Braves
PW 56.2
WARP3 82.1
ERA+ 140
MVPQ none
65. PHIL NIEKRO RHP
1964-87
Braves
PW 29.1
WARP3 109
MVPQ none
ERA+ 115
66. BILL DAHLEN SS
1891-11
Cubs/Dodgers/Giants
BFW 48.5
WARP3 88.5
OPS+ 109
MVPQ none
67. TONY GWYNN RF
1982-01
Padres
BFW 38.6
WARP3 97.6
OPS+ 132
MVPQ none
68. DAN BROUTHERS 1B
Bisons/Wolverines
1879-94
BFW 43.2
WARP3 92.8
OPS+ 170
MVPQ none
69. GABBY HARTNETT C
1922-41
Cubs
BFW 44.4
WARP3 91.2
OPS+ 126
MVPQ none
70. REGGIE JACKSON RF/DH
1967-87
Athletics/Yankees/Angels
BFW 38.7
WARP3 93.5
OPS+ 139
MVPQ 1969
-An expanse of only ½ an MVPQ season covers Gary Carter to Reggie.
So, what do we have – as mentioned, there’s Whitaker, 1 MVPQ behind Grich, making him the 6th best second baseman ever. We get all the way to Niekro, the 20th best pitcher who ever lived – the distance between Niekro and the tenth best pitcher, Seaver, is 3 ½ MVPQ seasons. Reggie and Gwynn are in the same spot – both 1 MVPQ season behind Molitor. Dahlen’s the 9th SS on the list, half an MVPQ behind Larkin and just a little further than that behind the other pre 20th c SS Davis. And like Dahlen following Davis, Dan Brouthers and his 170 OPS+ follows Roger Connor on the 1B list. Look at all the handlebar moustaches from the Gilded Age batsmen!
71. RAFAEL PALMEIRO 1B
1986-05
Rangers/Orioles
BFW 35.8
WARP3 96.1
OPS+ 132
MVPQ 1993
72. EDDIE MURRAY 1B
1977-97
Orioles/Dodgers
BFW 35.1
WARP3 96.4
OPS+ 129
MVPQ 1990
-They had the same career. You can switch them if this ordering offends.
73. AL KALINE RF
1953-74
Tigers
BFW 43.8
WARP3 89.5
OPS+ 134
MVPQ none
74. EDGAR MARTINEZ DH
1987-04
Mariners
BFW 44.6
WARP3 88.2
OPS+ 147
MVPQ none
75. TIM RAINES LF
1979-02
Expos/White Sox
BFW 38.2
WARP3 94.2
OPS+ 123
MVPQ none
-Kaline and Raines are less than half an MVPQ behind Gwynn and Reggie.
76. MIKE MUSSINA RHP
1991-08
Orioles/Yankees
PW 33.4
WARP3 98.9
ERA+ 123
MVPQ none
-Mussina’s only 1 MVPQ season behind Gibson and Lefty.
77. CARLTON FISK C
1969-93
Red Sox/White Sox
BFW 38.8
WARP3 93.4
OPS+ 117
MVPQ none
-The fifth best catcher in history, just a tick behind Hartnett, not quite a full MVPQ behind Carter; the next two catchers coming from behind are even closer to Fisk than that.
78. LUKE APPLING SS
1930-50
White Sox
BFW 42.4
WARP3 86.7
OPS+ 112
MVPQ 1943
79. PETE ROSE Uti
1963-86
Reds/Phillies
BFW 24.4
WARP3 106.4
OPS+ 118
MVPQ none
-Another ½ of an MVP season and we get the rest of the 70s. Rose is a good marker here – he’s one MVPQ season behind Yaz. 2 behind Yount. Almost 3 behind Bench. 8 behind Morgan. Ranking the Red Machine:
1. Morgan
2. Bench
3. Rose
Is easy.
80. JIM THOME (ACTIVE) 1B/DH
1991-
Indians/Phillies/White Sox
BFW (2007) 38.7
WARP3 88.8
OPS+ 147
MVPQ none
-Don’t look now but Jim Thome’s still hitting the ball. By the end of 2010, he might well catch Palmeiro and Murray. He might finish behind Roger Connor as the ninth best 1B who ever lived. Jim Thome’s a HOF’er.
81. SCOTT ROLEN 3B (ACTIVE)
1996-
Phillies/Cardinals
BFW(2007)38.1
WARP3 86.4
OPS+ 124
MVPQ 2004
-Rolen doesn’t have as much left, you wouldn’t think. But he goes past Rose by end of 2010. Scott Rolen’s going to finish his career as the 5th best third baseman of all time (momentarily). He’s 4 MVPQ seasons behind George Brett. Scott Rolen is a HOF’er.
82. ED DELAHANTY LF
1888-03
Phillies
BFW42.8
WARP3 84.7
OPS+ 152
MVPQ 1893
83. YOGI BERRA C
1946-65
Yankees
BFW40.2
WARP3 90.1
OPS+ 125
MVPQ none
- 84. BILL DICKEY C
1928-46
Yankees
BFW 38.5
WARP3 88.5
OPS+ 127
MVPQ 1937
-One of my favorite quirks about this version of the list is Berra and Dickey come out back to back with statistically the same career. They’re both half an MVPQ season behind Hartnett – 3 MVPQ seasons behind Pudge and Bench.
85. GARY SHEFFIELD (ACTIVE)
1988-
Marlins/Dodgers
BFW (2007) 44
WARP3 82.6
OPS+ 140
MVPQ none
-Maybe Sheff catches Rose. Maybe.
86. CHARLIE GEHRINGER 2B
1924-42
Tigers
BFW45.1
WARP3 84.7
OPS+ 124
MVPQ none
-Tigers, Tigers, Tigers. Gehringer is the 7th best 2B ever, one MVPQ season behind Whitaker, the 6th best.
87. LOU BOUDREAU SS
1938-52
Indians
BFW 43.6
WARP3 82.6
OPS+ 120
-Less than a half MVPQ behind Appling.
88. HAL NEWHOUSER LHP
1939-55
Tigers
PW37.2
WARP3 81.7
ERA+ 130
MVPQ 1944, 45 (best) 46
89. ALAN TRAMMELL SS
1977-96
Tigers
BFW 31.1
WARP3 93.6
OPS+ 110
MVPQ 1984
-Enough with the Tigers already! Newhouser’s the 22nd pitcher; one MVPQ behind Niekro for that 20th spot. Trammell’s the 12 SS, just 1 MVPQ behind his double play partner Whitaker despite being 27 spots behind, which again indicates how close everyone is at this point in the list.
90. CHIPPER JONES 3B (ACTIVE)
1993-
Braves
BFW (2007) 32
WARP3 87.9
OPS+ 144
MVPQ none
-Chipper turns 38 next year; he can’t stay healthy but other than that, dude can still play baseball, his best ever year with the bat was 2008. By end of 2010 he’s…Pete Rose. Chipper and Scott Rolen could be fighting for that 5th all time 3rd base spot.
91. ROBIN VENTURA 3B
1989-04
White Sox/Mets
BFW24.5
WARP3 96.6
OPS+ 114
MVPQ 1991, 92 (best)
-If Chipper died today, I’d probably rank him below Ventura – I’m assuming that won’t happen and slotting him here. I get enjoyment ranking Ventura ahead of Nolan Ryan.
92. CURT SCHILLING RHP
1988-07
Phillies/Diamonbacks/Red Sox
PW 32.1
WARP3 94.2
MVPQ none
ERA+ 127
5 ½ MVP quality seasons behind the Unit; Schilling’s the 23rd best pitcher ever and Johnson’s the 7th – but the distance between them is about the difference between Ruth, the best player ever – and Mays, the third best player ever.
93. ROD CAREW 2B/1B
1967-85
Twins/Angels
BFW 39.5
WARP3 85.8
OPS+ 131
MVPQ none
-Just half an MVPQ between Sheff and Carew. Carew, at 93 overall is only 1 MVPq season behind Reggie at 70 overall. Recall, that’s the same difference between Ruth and Bonds – and much less than the difference between Bonds and Mays. If we slot Carew at 2b, he’s 8th best, half an MVPQ behind Gehringer.
94. GAYLORD PERRY RHP
1962-83
Giants/Indians/Rangers
PW32.9
WARP3 91.2
ERA+ 117
MVPQ 1972
-Gaylord Perry cheated. Cheated his whole career. Defined his whole career based on his cheating. The full totality of his legend is due to cheating. He’s in the HOF without a whisper of protest.
95. PAUL WANER RF
1926-45
Pirates
BFW 33.8
WARP3 90
OPS+ 134
MVPQ none
96. TED LYONS RHP
1923-46
White Sox
PW 33.5
WARP3 90.2
ERA+ 118
MVPQ none
-If Musial’s a first baseman, that would make Waner the 20th OF – Lyons is the 25th pitcher regardless of where we put Stan. 4 more to make the top 100 – who will be on the list? Who? Who?
97. RON SANTO 3B
1960-74
Cubs
BFW 44.7
WARP3 72.7
OPS+ 125
MVPQ 1964, 66 (best)
-Santo should be in the HOF, yes. But he wasn’t better than Ventura, and he ain’t getting documentaries trumpeting his candidacy.
98. DENNIS ECKERSLEY RHP
1975-98
Red Sox/Athletics
PW30.5
WARP3 92.8
ERA+ 116
MVPQ none
99. BOB FELLER RHP
1936-56
Indians
PW 31.6
WARP3 82.2
ERA+ 122
MVPQ 1939 (best) 40, 46
-There’s only half an MVPQ season between Newhouser (22nd pitcher) and Feller (27th) – and there’s just no daylight at all among Perry/Lyons/Eck/Feller.
100. CRAIG BIGGIO 2B/C
1988-07
Astros
BFW 28.9
WARP3 90
OPS+ 111
MVPQ 1997
-And that’s your 100 best MLB players who ever lived. 101/102 are indistinguishable, you could move either of them here if you like. 11 MVPQ seasons separate Biggio, who should be viewed as a HOF’er, and Lajoie. Not all Hall of Famers are created equal.
101. JOE CRONIN SS
1926-45
Senators/Red Sox
BFW 39.6
WARP3 78.7
OPS+ 119
MVPQ 1930
102. BERT BLYLEVEN RHP
1970-92
Twins/Indians
PW 31.8
WARP3 89.4
ERA+ 118
MVPQ none
103. FRANKIE FRISCH 2B
1919-37
Giants/Cardinals
BFW 37.3
WARP3 83.3
OPS+ 111
MVPQ none
-Frisch is one MVPQ season behind Ed Delahanty (#82). Two behind Gary Carter (#59). Three behind Cap Anson (#47). Four behind Pudge (#38). Six behind Randy Johnson (#29). Seven behind Eddie Mathews (#25). Eleven behind Greg Maddux (#14). Fourteen behind Ty Cobb (#5). Seventeen behind Willie Mays (#3). And a little over 24 MVPQ seasons behind Ruth. Or – exactly 2 Frankie Frisch’s behind Ruth. 3 Frankie Frisch’s = Babe Ruth. And Frisch is the 103rd best player who ever lived.
104. ROBBY ALOMAR 2B
1988-04
Blue Jays/Orioles/Indians
BFW35.8
WARP3 81
OPS+ 116
MVPQ 1999
105. MIKE PIAZZA C
1992-07
Dodgers/Mets
BFW42.3
WARP3 77.4
OPS+ 142
MVPQ none
106. KEVIN BROWN RHP
1986-05
Rangers/Dodgers
PW 33.7
WARP3 82.1
ERA+ 127
MVPQ 1996
107. JEFF KENT 2B
1992-08
Mets/Giants/Dodgers
BFW 38.6
WARP3 80
OPS+ 123
MVPQ none
108. ROBERTO CLEMENTE RF
1955-72
Pirates
BFW 35.4
WARP3 82.7
OPS+ 130
MVPQ none
109. JIM EDMONDS CF
1993-08
Angels/Cardinals
BFW (2007) 35.1
WARP3 82.5
OPS+ 132
MVPQ none
110. JOHNNY MIZE 1B
Cardinals/Giants/Yankees
BFW 37.7
WARP3 80.2
OPS+ 158
MVPQ none
111. RED RUFFING RHP
1924-47
Red Sox/Yankees
PW31.4
WARP3 86
MVPQ none
ERA+ 109
112. FERGUSON JENKINS RHP
1965-83
Cubs/Rangers
PW 30.4
WARP3 86.6
MVPQ none
ERA+ 115
113. KING KELLY C/RF
1878-93
Cubs/Braves
BFW28.9
WARP3 85.1
OPS+ 138
MVPQ 1886
114. ED WALSH RHP
1904-17
White Sox
PW 37.6
WARP3 69.6
ERA+ 146
MVPQ 1908, 1910 (best), 1912
115. BID MCPHEE 2B
1882-99
Reds
BFW 38.3
WARP3 77.7
OPS+ 106
MVPQ none
116. RYNE SANDBERG 2B
1981-97
Cubs
BFW 36.8
WARP3 75.8
OPS+ 114
MVPQ 1984
117. DAVE WINFIELD RF
1973-95
Padres/Yankees
BFW 30.1
WARP3 85.2
OPS+ 130
MVPQ none
118. MARK MCGWIRE 1B
1987-01
Athletics/Cardinals
BFW 35.3
WARP3 79.9
OPS+ 162
MVPQ none
-From Frisch at #103 all the way down to fellow Cardinal McGwire at #118 is only a distance of half an MVPQ season.
119. EARLY WYNN RHP
1939-63
Senators/Indians/White Sox
PW19.5
WARP3 85.1
MVPQ none
ERA+ 107
120. EDDIE PLANK LHP
1901-17
Athletics
PW30.3
ERA+ 3.73
WARP3 83.2
ERA+ 122
MVPQ none
121. WILLIE MCCOVEY 1B
1959-80
Giants
BFW 39.3
WARP3 74
OPS+ 147
MVPQ none
122. DON DRYSDALE RHP
1956-69
PW32.4
WARP3 77.3
MVPQ 1964
ERA+ 121
123. VLADIMIR GUERRERO (ACTIVE) RF
1996-
Expos/Angels
BFW (2007) 38.1
WARP3 71
MVPQ none
OPS+ 146
-Vlad’s in the decline phase; he should catch Winfield by end of 2010. The other Expo – Raines, is a good target to reach by career’s end.
124. BOBBY DOERR 2B
1937-51
Red Sox
BFW 40.3
WARP3 72.2
OPS+ 115
MVPQ none
125. BUCK EWING C
1880-97
Giants
BFW29.1
WARP3 83.4
OPS+ 129
MVPQ none
126. NOLAN RYAN RHP
1966-93
PW 22.2
WARP3 89.9
MVPQ none
ERA+ 111
127. WILLIE STARGELL LF/1B
1962-82
Pirates
BFW 29.5
WARP3 82.2
OPS+ 147
MVPQ none
128. TREVOR HOFFMAN RHP (ACTIVE)
1993 –
Padres
PW (2007) 27.9
WARP3 81.6
ERA+ 147
MVPQ none
-If Hoffman can get a 2010 out of his arm that approximates his 2009, he’s going to slide past Ryan and Drysdale.
129. AMOS RUSIE RHP
1889-01
Giants
PW36.7
WARP3 68.5
MVPQ 1893, 94 (best)
ERA+ 129
130. JACK GLASSCOCK SS
Blues/Hoosiers/Giants
1879-95
BFW 36.6
WARP3 74.1
MVPQ none
OPS+ 112
-The unfortunately named Glasscock was 8 years old when the Civil War ended.
That means he remembered the Civil War; it existed in his memory, and since he was born in West Virginia, it’s possible that he had family members on both sides. Glasscock played on the 1894 Pirates with Jake Beckley. Beckley played on the 1906 Cardinals with Babe Adams. Adams played on the 1926 Pirates with Joe Cronin. Joe Cronin played on the 1942 Red Sox with Ted Williams. Williams played on the 1958 Red Sox with Jimmy Piersall. Piersall played on the 1967 Angels with Jim Fregosi. Fregosi played on the 1978 Pirates with Don Robinson. Robinson played on the 1992 Phillies with Curt Schilling. Schilling played on the 2007 Red Sox with two dozen guys still in the big leagues.
And that’s what’s fun.
131. JIM O' ROURKE LF
1872-04
Braves/Giants
BFW 16.1
WARP3 94.4
OPS+ 133
MVPQ none
132. SAM CRAWFORD CF
1899-17
Tigers
BFW 29.8
WARP3 80.6
OPS+ 144
MVPQ none
133. HOYT WILHELM RHP
Giants/Orioles/White Sox
1952-72
PW37.1
WARP3 73.3
ERA+ 146
MVPQ none
134. JOHN CLARKSON
1882-94
Cubs/Braves
PW 42.5
WARP3 58.5
ERA+ 134
MVPq 1885, 87, 89 (best)
135. WHITEY FORD LHP
1950-67
Yankees
PW37.2
WARP3 72.4
MVPQ none
ERA+ 133
-From Early Wynn at #119 to Ford – only ½ an MVPQ season of difference. The next 30 spots have 1 MVPQ season of difference, from Vance down to #166. I mention this as #166 is the player at which I’d stop voting for them for HOF. Everyone above the line gets my vote, below the line – nope.
136. DAZZY VANCE RHP
1915-35
Dodgers
PW29.2
WARP3 74.3
MVPQ 1924 (best) 28
ERA+ 125
137. BILLY HERMAN 2B
1931-47
Cubs/Dodgers
BFW 31.6
WARP3 77.8
OPS+ 112
MVPQ none
-Full name: William Jennings Bryan Herman. You’re welcome.
138. DICK ALLEN 3B/1B
1963-77
Phillies
BFW 39
WARP3 70
OPS+ 156
MVPQ 1964
139. FRED CLARKE LF
1894-15
Pirates
BFW 27.9
WARP3 81.1
OPS+ 132
MVPQ none
140. JACKIE ROBINSON 2B
1947-56
Dodgers
BFW 34.3
WARP3 67.9
OPS+ 132
MVPQ 1949, 51 (best)
141. BOBBY ABREU (ACTIVE) RF
1996-
Phillies
BFW30.1
WARP3 76.6
OPS+ 132
MVPQ none
-By end of 2010 he could wind up at the top of this section, right with O’Rourke and Crawford.
142. BOBBY WALLACE SS
1894-18
Browns
BFW35.2
OPS+ 105
WARP3 72.8
MVPQ none
143. JOHN OLERUD 1B
1989-05
Blue Jays/Mariners
BFW24.5
WARP3 80
OPS+ 128
MVPQ 1993
144. WILLIE RANDOLPH 2B
1975-92
Yankees
BFW 36
WARP3 70.7
OPS+ 104
MVPQ none
145. JUAN MARICHAL RHP
1960-75
Giants
PW 27.7
WARP3 72.9
MVPQ 1965, 66 (best)
ERA+ 123
146. BERNIE WILLIAMS CF
1991-06
Yankees
BFW24.6
WARP3 78.9
ERA+ 125
MVPQ 1995
147. JOE TORRE C
1960-77
Braves/Cardinals
BFW22.6
WARP3 80.4
OPS+ 128
MVPQ 1966
148. JIM PALMER RHP
1965-84
Orioles
PW35
WARP3 70.8
MVPQ none
ERA+ 126
149. ERNIE BANKS SS/1B
1953-71
Cubs
BFW 27.8
WARP3 74.8
OPS+ 122
MVPQ 1959
150. WES FERRELL RHP
1927-41
Indians/Red Sox
WARP3 68.6
PW 31.1
ERA+ 116
MVPQ 1930, 31, 35 (best)
151. BILLY HAMILTON CF
1888-01
Phillies/Braves
BFW27.2
OPS+ 141
WARP3 78.3
MVPQ none
152. DEREK JETER SS (ACTIVE)
1995 -
Yankees
BFW (2007) 17.3
OPS+ 121
WARP3 81.4
MVPQ none
-Jeter breaks the top 150 by end of 2010, maybe somewhere between Banks and Wallace. Sandberg might be where Jeter finishes up.
153. BRET SABERHAGEN RHP
1984-01
Royals/Mets/Red Sox
PW27.9
WARP3 74.3
MVPQ 1989
ERA+ 126
154. MICKEY COCHRANE C
1925-37
Athletics/Tigers
BFW 34.7
WARP3 70.1
OPS+ 128
MVPQ none
155. STAN HACK 3B
1932-47
Cubs
BFW29.4
WARP3 74.4
OPS+ 119
MVPQ none
156. DARRELL EVANS 3B/1B
1969-89
Braves/Giants/Tigers
BFW 41.4
WARP3 62.1
OPS+ 119
MVPQ none
157. HOME RUN BAKER 3B
1908-22
Athletics/Yankees
BFW33.7
WARP3 69.6
OPS+ 135
MVPQ none
158. HARMON KILLEBREW 1B
1954-75
Senators/Twins
BFW32
WARP3 70.9
OPS+ 143
MVPQ none
159. KEITH HERNANDEZ 1B
1974-90
Cardinals/Mets
BFW33.5
WARP3 69.1
OPS+ 128
MVPQ none
160. BUCKY WALTERS RHP
1934-50
Reds
PW 26.7
WARP3 72.2
ERA+ 115
MVPQ 1939
161. ELMER FLICK RF
1898-10
Phillies/Indians
BFW 29.7
OPS+ 149
WARP3 72.8
MVPQ none
162. GRAIG NETTLES 3B
1967-88
Yankees
BFW21.2
OPS+ 110
WARP3 80.2
MVPQ none
163. JESSE BURKETT LF
Spiders/Cardinals
1890-05
BFW27.9
WARP3 73.3
OPS+ 140
MVPQ none
164. HARRY HEILMANN RF
1914-32
Tigers
BFW33.2
WARP3 67.7
OPS+ 148
MVPQ none
165. JORGE POSADA C
1995-
Yankees
BFW (2007) 27
WARP3 68.8
OPS+ 124
MVPQ none
-Posada probably doesn’t catch Torre or Cochrane by end of 2010, he might not finish up in top 150.
166. DON SUTTON RHP
1966-88
Dodgers
PW17.5
WARP3 83.7
MVPQ none
-That’s where I’d cut off the HOF. Right there. Don Sutton would be the line of demarcation – better career than Sutton – in, not as good – out. Everyone left has only half an MVPQ spread among them.
167. BOB JOHNSON LF
1933-45
Athletics
BFW 35.7
WARP3 63.7
OPS+ 138
MVPQ none
168. HEINE GROH 3B
1912-27
Reds/Giants
BFW 30.4
WARP3 68.8
OPS+ 118
MVPQ none
169. RICHIE ASHBURN CF
1948-62
Phillies
BFW22.8
WARP3 76.2
OPS+ 111
MVPQ none
170. BOB LEMON RHP
1946-58
Indians
PW 34.2
WARP3 64.7
ERA+ 119
MVPQ none
171. WILL CLARK 1B
1986-00
Giants/Rangers
BFW24.4
WARP3 74.4
OPS+ 137
MVPQ none
172. JOE JACKSON LF/RF
1908-20
Indians/White Sox
OPS+ 170
BFW 38.3
WARP3 60.1
MVPQ none
173. JOE SEWELL SS
Indians
BFW 35.2
WARP3 62.7
OPS+ 109
MVPQ none
174. JIMMY WYNN CF
1963-77
Astros
BFW 29.6
WARP3 68.2
MVPQ none
OPS+ 128
175. BILLY PIERCE LHP
1945-64
White Sox
ERA+ 119
PW 25.6
WARP3 72.1
176. DUTCH LEONARD RHP
1933-53
Dodgers/Senators/Cubs
ERA+ 119
PW 22.2
WARP3 75.5
MVPQ none
177. SAMMY SOSA RF
1989-07
Cubs
BFW25
WARP3 69.6
OPS+ 128
MVPQ 2001
178. CARLOS BELTRAN CF (ACTIVE)
1998 -
Royals/Mets
OPS+ 119
BFW (2007) 19.1
WARP3 68.9
MVPQ 2006 (best) 2008
-By end of 2010 he’s in the HOF or knocking on the door.
179. LARRY WALKER RF
1989-05
Expos/Rockies
BFW 32.8
WARP3 63.8
OPS+ 140
MVPQ none
180. DIZZY TROUT RHP
1939-57
Tigers
WARP3 66.7
PW 29.7
MVPQ 1944
ERA+ 124
181. JOE GORDON 2B
1938-50
Yankees/Indians
BFW 28.8
WARP 3 67.4
MVPQ none
OPS+ 120
182. RICK REUSCHEL RHP
1972-91
Cubs/Pirates/Giants
PW 23.2
WARP3 75.8
MVPQ none
ERA+ 114
183. MIGUEL TEJADA SS (ACTIVE)
1997-
Athletics/Orioles
OPS+ 111
WARP3 61.5
BFW (2007) 27.8
MVPQ 2004
184. TODD HELTON 1B (ACTIVE)
1997-
Rockies
WARP3 58.8
OPS+ 141
BFW 33.5
MVPQ none
-Both Tejada and Helton will probably still be short of the HOF line by end of 2010, but punch through by end of 2011 if they can hold on.
185. CESAR CEDENO CF
1970-86
Astros/Reds
WARP3 70.6
MVPQ 1972
BFW 22.3
OPS+ 123
186. STAN COVELESKI RHP
1912-28
Indians
WARP3 69.7
PW 26
ERA+ 127
MVPQ none
187. DWIGHT EVANS RF
1972-91
Red Sox
BFW 24.7
WARP3 70.5
MVPQ none
188. REGGIE SMITH CF/RF
1966-82
Red Sox/Dodgers
BFW 31.5
WARP3 63.5
MVPQ none
189. SAM THOMPSON RF
1885-06
Wolverines/Phillies
OPS+ 146
WARP3 65.5
BFW 29.5
MVPQ none
190. ANDRUW JONES CF (ACTIVE)
1996-
Braves
Ops+ 111
Warp3 73.9
BFW (2007) 21.6
MVPQ none
-Jones isn’t going to get to the HOF line.
191. HARDY RICHARDSON 2B
1879-92
Bisons/Wolverines
WARP3 65.2
MVPQ 1886
BFW 26.7
OPS+ 130
192. AL SIMMONS LF/CF
1924-44
Athletics/White Sox
BFW 23
WARP3 71.4
MVPQ none
OPS+ 132
193. BUDDY BELL 3B
1972-89
Indians/Tigers/Reds
BFW28
WARP3 63.2
MVPQ 1982
OPS+ 109
194. CHARLIE BENNETT C
1878-93
Wolverines/Beaneaters
OPS+118
WARP3 70.2
BFW 23.9
MVPQ none
195. OREL HERSHISER RHP
1983-00
Dodgers
ERA+ 112
WARP3 71.8
MVPQ 1988
PW 19.4
196. EPPA RIXEY LHP
1912-33
Phillies/Reds
ERA+ 115
WARP3 69.8
PW 24.2
MVPQ none
197. JACK CLARK RF
1975-92
Giants
BFW 29.6
WARP3 64.2
OPS+ 137
MVPQ none
198. JOSE CRUZ LF
1970-88
Cardinals/Astros
BFW 20.5
OPS+ 120
WARP3 72.7
MVPQ none
199. LANCE PARRISH C
1977-95
Tigers/Angels
BFW 22.3
OPS+ 106
WARP3 67.9
MVPQ none
200. BRIAN GILES (Active) LF/RF
1995 -
Pirates/Padres
BFW 29.2
WARP3 61.3
OPS+ 136
MVPQ none
I've already made one change, but really let's see if I can't leave this alone until the end of 2010. There's a world outside this list, contrary to popular opinion.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)