<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8310546519590608347.post3504940154119988978..comments</id><updated>2009-10-13T09:27:37.090-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Comments on The Blog of Revelation - by Jim Jividen: 2009 MLB Playoff Predictions</title><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://jimjividen.blogspot.com/feeds/3504940154119988978/comments/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8310546519590608347/3504940154119988978/comments/default'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://jimjividen.blogspot.com/2009/10/2009-mlb-playoff-predictions.html'/><author><name>Jim</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05482891070201124196</uri><email>jcjblog@hotmail.com</email></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>4</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8310546519590608347.post-7922517226135458285</id><published>2009-10-13T09:27:37.090-04:00</published><updated>2009-10-13T09:27:37.090-04:00</updated><title type='text'>On another note, can somebody tell me why teams fe...</title><summary type='text'>On another note, can somebody tell me why teams feel the need to have a champagne spraying celebration for winning a Division Series?  A pennant, yeah, a division title, sure, but a huge plastic sheeted celebration for winning a quarterfinal matchup?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Do NBA teams go nuts over advancing past the second round?  Do NBA teams party like it&amp;#39;s 1999 after advancing past the wildcard round</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8310546519590608347/3504940154119988978/comments/default/7922517226135458285'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8310546519590608347/3504940154119988978/comments/default/7922517226135458285'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://jimjividen.blogspot.com/2009/10/2009-mlb-playoff-predictions.html?showComment=1255440457090#c7922517226135458285' title=''/><author><name>Blog</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08429759201708400676</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='09417118993671648484'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://jimjividen.blogspot.com/2009/10/2009-mlb-playoff-predictions.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8310546519590608347.post-3504940154119988978' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8310546519590608347/posts/default/3504940154119988978' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8310546519590608347.post-408764602304915554</id><published>2009-10-10T00:31:12.201-04:00</published><updated>2009-10-10T00:31:12.201-04:00</updated><title type='text'>By "results" of course I am referring to wins, as ...</title><summary type='text'>By &amp;quot;results&amp;quot; of course I am referring to wins, as that is the only stat that really matters.  The old blog is no longer available, but I recall you saying something like the Padres were the worst team in the league and that they &lt;i&gt;couldn&amp;#39;t&lt;/i&gt; (as opposed to &amp;quot;wouldn&amp;#39;t, though I could be remembering it wrong) win more than 65 games.  So winning 75, and with winning streaks </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8310546519590608347/3504940154119988978/comments/default/408764602304915554'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8310546519590608347/3504940154119988978/comments/default/408764602304915554'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://jimjividen.blogspot.com/2009/10/2009-mlb-playoff-predictions.html?showComment=1255149072201#c408764602304915554' title=''/><author><name>Blog</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08429759201708400676</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='09417118993671648484'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://jimjividen.blogspot.com/2009/10/2009-mlb-playoff-predictions.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8310546519590608347.post-3504940154119988978' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8310546519590608347/posts/default/3504940154119988978' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8310546519590608347.post-8773536411089717845</id><published>2009-10-09T09:57:14.227-04:00</published><updated>2009-10-09T09:57:14.227-04:00</updated><title type='text'>San Diego was pretty bad; their pythagorean is low...</title><summary type='text'>San Diego was pretty bad; their pythagorean is lower than their actual win/loss (which at 75-87 still isn&amp;#39;t glorious), they gave up 131 more runs than they scored.  Unless I&amp;#39;m misreading you, which just struck me, and what you&amp;#39;re saying isn&amp;#39;t &amp;quot;the Padres played better than forecasted&amp;quot; and instead &amp;quot;the Padres won more games than they should have based on how poorly </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8310546519590608347/3504940154119988978/comments/default/8773536411089717845'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8310546519590608347/3504940154119988978/comments/default/8773536411089717845'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://jimjividen.blogspot.com/2009/10/2009-mlb-playoff-predictions.html?showComment=1255096634227#c8773536411089717845' title=''/><author><name>Jim</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05482891070201124196</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='10417352461809228155'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://jimjividen.blogspot.com/2009/10/2009-mlb-playoff-predictions.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8310546519590608347.post-3504940154119988978' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8310546519590608347/posts/default/3504940154119988978' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8310546519590608347.post-4513020801024777343</id><published>2009-10-09T08:27:23.025-04:00</published><updated>2009-10-09T08:27:23.025-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Since team chemistry has no bearing on results wha...</title><summary type='text'>Since team chemistry has no bearing on results whatsoever, to what do you attribute the overachieving seasons of the Mariners and the Padres?</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8310546519590608347/3504940154119988978/comments/default/4513020801024777343'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8310546519590608347/3504940154119988978/comments/default/4513020801024777343'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://jimjividen.blogspot.com/2009/10/2009-mlb-playoff-predictions.html?showComment=1255091243025#c4513020801024777343' title=''/><author><name>Blog</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08429759201708400676</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='09417118993671648484'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://jimjividen.blogspot.com/2009/10/2009-mlb-playoff-predictions.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8310546519590608347.post-3504940154119988978' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8310546519590608347/posts/default/3504940154119988978' type='text/html'/></entry></feed>